Lukinmaa 1989.
Methods | RCT conducted in Finland | |
Participants | Patients with LBP referred to a regional hospital. 203 patients randomised, 52.7% female, average age 43.6 years, mean duration of pain 15.3 months | |
Interventions |
MBR (Biopsychosocial): 5 days inpatient, treatment according to the biopsychosocial model Usual (Biomedical): orthopaedic outpatient treatment according to the biomedical model |
|
Outcomes | Pain (VAS), Disability (RMDQ), General Health (global perceived effect), Work (% retired) Follow‐ups: LT (12 months) |
|
Notes | Subgroup analyses: Mid intensity intervention, Low baseline symptom intensity (<60% of maximum scale score). Included in Guzman 2006 | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Unclear |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Unclear |
Blinding of participants | High risk | Not possible |
Blinding of clinicians | High risk | Not possible |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not possible; patient reported outcome |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | pg.137. 78% follow‐up |
Intention to treat analysis | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No protocol |
Comparability of groups at baseline | Low risk | pg.136 Table. Groups comparable on relevant demographic and clinical variables |
Compliance | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Cointerventions | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Timing of assessment | Low risk | pg.136 Methods of collecting data. One year follow‐up |