Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 2;2014(9):CD000963. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000963.pub3

Lukinmaa 1989.

Methods RCT conducted in Finland
Participants Patients with LBP referred to a regional hospital. 203 patients randomised, 52.7% female, average age 43.6 years, mean duration of pain 15.3 months
Interventions MBR (Biopsychosocial): 5 days inpatient, treatment according to the biopsychosocial model
Usual (Biomedical): orthopaedic outpatient treatment according to the biomedical model
Outcomes Pain (VAS), Disability (RMDQ), General Health (global perceived effect), Work (% retired)
Follow‐ups: LT (12 months)
Notes Subgroup analyses: Mid intensity intervention, Low baseline symptom intensity (<60% of maximum scale score). Included in Guzman 2006
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear
Blinding of participants High risk Not possible
Blinding of clinicians High risk Not possible
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Not possible; patient reported outcome
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk pg.137. 78% follow‐up
Intention to treat analysis Unclear risk Not stated
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No protocol
Comparability of groups at baseline Low risk pg.136 Table. Groups comparable on relevant demographic and clinical variables
Compliance Unclear risk Not stated
Cointerventions Unclear risk Not stated
Timing of assessment Low risk pg.136 Methods of collecting data. One year follow‐up