Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 28;15:1344971. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1344971

Table 3.

Histologic characteristics of the established NAFLD and NASH mice (n=5 for each group).

Parameters Control NAFLD C-NASH M-NASH
Normoxia Hypoxia Normoxia Hypoxia Normoxia Hypoxia Normoxia Hypoxia
Steatosis grade (0-3) 0 0 1.28 ± 0.42# 1.12 ± 0.34# 2.13 ± 0.37# 2.24 ± 0.38# 2.73 ± 0.32# 2.84 ± 0.36#
Lobular inflammation (0-3) 0 0.13 ± 0.10 0.16 ± 0.03 0.38 ± 0.12# 0.79 ± 0.22# 1.34 ± 0.28*# 1.06 ± 0.26# 1.95 ± 0.18*#
Ballooning score (0-2) 0 0 1.00 ± 0.00# 1.52 ± 0.34*# 2.00 ± 0.00# 2.00 ± 0.00# 2.00 ± 0.00# 2.00 ± 0.00#
NAS grade (0-8) 0 0.13 ± 0.10 2.38 ± 0.72# 2.97 ± 0.83# 5.08 ± 1.24# 5.64 ± 0.62# 5.71 ± 1.16# 6.28 ± 0.52#
Portal inflammation (0-3) 0 0 0.16 ± 0.03 0.28 ± 0.12# 0.59 ± 0.12# 0.94 ± 0.11*# 1.46 ± 0.1# 1.95 ± 0.12*#
Fibrosis stage (0-4) 0 0 0.11 ± 0.02 0.58 ± 0.05*# 1.12 ± 0.24# 2.23 ± 0.36*# 2.28 ± 0.18# 3.02 ± 0.42*#

On-way analysis of variance: *p < 0.05 between the two groups under the same conditions; #p < 0.05 vs control group.