Table 2.
Performance comparison of RS1, RS2, Delta-RS/RS1, C-U-R model radiomics models.
| Training cohort | Validation cohort | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RS1 | RS2 | Delta-RS/RS1 | C-U-R model | RS1 | RS2 | Delta-RS/RS1 | C-U-R model | |
| AUC | 0.739 | 0.863 | 0.850 | 0.902 | 0.748 | 0.817 | 0.799 | 0.885 |
| Accuracy | 0.787 | 0.830 | 0.806 | 0.861 | 0.793 | 0.829 | 0.779 | 0.857 |
| Precision | 0.721 | 0.762 | 0.712 | 0.795 | 0.667 | 0.731 | 0.620 | 0.767 |
| Sensitivity | 0.500 | 0.750 | 0.795 | 0.818 | 0.528 | 0.722 | 0.861 | 0.722 |
| Specificity | 0.873 | 0.835 | 0.780 | 0.873 | 0.856 | 0.817 | 0.606 | 0.904 |
| Recall | 0.352 | 0.546 | 0.477 | 0.659 | 0.389 | 0.528 | 0.361 | 0.639 |
| F1-score | 0.473 | 0.636 | 0.571 | 0.721 | 0.491 | 0.613 | 0.456 | 0.697 |
| Youden Index | 0.373 | 0.585 | 0.575 | 0.691 | 0.384 | 0.540 | 0.467 | 0.626 |
AUC, the area under the ROC curve; RS, radiomics signature; C-U-R, clinicopathological features, ultrasound features, and RS2.