Table 1.
Cut-off 0 to 1.5 vs >1.5 Kappa (95% CI) |
Cut-off 0 to 7 vs >7 Kappa (95% CI) |
Cut-off 0 to 10 vs >10 Kappa (95% CI) |
Cut-off 0 to 17 vs >17 Kappa (95% CI) |
|
CRP-PMR-AS versus ESR-PMR-AS | 0.75 (0.70 to 0.80) | 0.87 (0.84 to 0.90) | 0.90 (0.87 to 0.93) | 0.89 (0.86 to 0.93) |
CRP-PMR-AS versus clin-PMR-AS | 0.91 (0.88 to 0.94) | 0.93 (0.90 to 0.95) | 0.93 (0.90 to 0.95) | 0.94 (0.92 to 0.97) |
CRP-PMR-AS versus imp-CRP-PMR-AS | 0.92 (.89 to 0.95) | 0.92 (0.89 to 0.94) | 0.91 (0.89 to 0.94) | 0.92 (0.89 to 0.95) |
Global kappa coefficient was calculated for the whole population (n=100) of the SEMAPHORE trial at all visits between inclusion and week 24.
The results are presented as kappa coefficients with 95% CIs.
*Details on the activity scores are provided in the caption of figure 1.
AS, activity score; clin, clinical; CRP, C reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; imp, imputed; PMR, polymyalgia rheumatica; SEMAPHORE, Safety and Efficacy of tocilizumab versus Placebo in Polymyalgia rHeumatica With glucocORticoid dEpendence.