Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 15;12:e16891. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16891

Table 4. Model comparison using log-likelihood, AIC and BIC in Experiment 2.

Model Type Random intercept effects Fixed effects Log likelihood Number of parameters Degrees of freedom AIC BIC
1 Null −401.268 3 2 806.536 815.013
2 Null Rounds −400.952 7 4 804.144 821.097
3* Full Rounds Cue −329.242 11 6 659.708 685.138
4 Full Rounds Cue + Group −328.918 15 8 663.007 696.913
5 Full Rounds Cue × Group −326.628 23 10 662.367 704.750
6 Full Rounds Cue × Group + Sex −324.316 27 12 661.321 712.181
7 Full Rounds Cue × Group × Sex −320.773 59 18 666.217 742.507

Notes:

Cue, Conspecific cue location; Group, Group size.

*

Selected model.