TABLE 2.

Identified themes in relation to the review's aims

Aim	Results	Theme
Aim 1: The most common methods (e.g., screening tools, interviews) for identifying ARMS in primary care	Two tools identified: PCCL checklist (French & Morrison, 2004) ERIraos checklist (Maurer et al., 2006)	Theme 2: Balancing over‐ and under‐identification of individuals with an ARMS in primary care
Aim 2: Methods of improving identification of ARMS in primary care	Educational interventions for GPs Optimizing cut‐off values of existing tools Using medical‐record‐based prognostic models	Theme 2: Balancing over‐ and under‐identification of individuals with an ARMS in primary care
	Providing specialist input within primary care practices	Theme 3: Supporting GPs as significant stakeholders in early diagnosis and treatment of individuals with an ARMS
Aim 3: The most common barriers to screening for ARMS in primary care	Lack of knowledge about ARMS Lack of confidence in treating ARMS	Theme 1: Improving GP knowledge and confidence in identifying individuals with an ARMS
	Limited time for individual consultations High threshold for secondary care mental health services Long waiting times Patient‐experienced stigma	Theme 3: Supporting GPs as significant stakeholders in early diagnosis and treatment of individuals with an ARMS