Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 8;49(2):e12894. doi: 10.1111/nan.12894

TABLE 5.

MNP and SVM model display contrasting performance for classification of glioneuronal tumours.

Sample Histology BRAF/FGFR1 Consensus clustering SVM MNP
VAL1 GG BRAF V600E Group 1 Group 1 CONTR, REACT*
VAL2 GG BRAF V600E Group 1 Group 1 CONTR, REACT*
VAL3 GG Group 1 Group 1 CONTR, REACT*
VAL4 GG Group 1 Group 1 PLEX, PED B*
VAL5 GG Group 1 Group 1 MNG*
VAL6 GG Group 1 Group 1 PLEX, PED B*
VAL7 GNT NOS BRAF V600E Group 1 Group 1 LGG, PA/GG ST
VAL8 GNT NOS Group 1 Group 1 LGG, PA/GG ST
VAL34 DNET Group 2 Group 1 MB, G3*
VAL16 DNET FGFR1‐TACC1 Group 2 Group 2 LGG, DNT
VAL17 DNET FGFR1 TKD Group 2 Group 2 LGG, DNT*
VAL18 DNET FGFR1 TKD Group 2 Group 2 LGG, DNT
VAL19 DNET FGFR1 TKD Group 2 Group 2 LGG, DNT
VAL20 DNET FGFR1 TKD Group 2 Group 2 LGG, DNT
VAL21 DNET FGFR1 TKD Group 2 Group 2 LGG, DNT
VAL22 DNET FGFR1 TKD Group 2 Group 2 LGG, DNT
VAL23 DNET FGFR1 TKD Group 2 Group 2 LGG, DNT
VAL24 DNET FGFR1 TKD Group 2 Group 2 LGG, DNT
VAL25 DNET FGFR1 TKD Group 2 Group 2 LGG, DNT
VAL26 DNET Group 2 Group 2 LGG, DNT
VAL27 DNET Group 2 Group 2 LGG, DNT*
VAL28 GNT NOS Group 2 Group 2 LGG, DNT*
VAL29 GNT NOS Group 2 Group 2 LGG, DNT
VAL10 GG BRAF V600E Control/Diffuse Group 1 LGG, GG
VAL11 GG BRAF V600E Control/Diffuse Group 1 LGG, GG*
VAL12 GG BRAF V600E Control/Diffuse Group 1 LGG, GG
VAL13 GG BRAF V600E Control/Diffuse Group 1 LGG, GG*
VAL32 GNT NOS Control/Diffuse Group 1 LGG, GG
VAL33 GG Control/Diffuse Group 1 LGG, GG
VAL9 GG BRAF V600E Control/Diffuse Group 1 LGG, GG
VAL15 GG BRAF V600E Control/Diffuse Group 2 LGG, GG
VAL14 GG BRAF V600E Control/Diffuse Control LGG, GG
VAL30 DNET FGFR1 TKD Control/Diffuse Control CONTR, HEMI*
VAL31 GG Control/Diffuse Control LGG, GG

Note: Of the 23 tumours segregated by consensus clustering, MNP classifies 13/23 (56%) concordantly, rising to 16/23 (69%) when confidence threshold is ignored. MNP performs comparably with SVM for Group 2/DNET, whereas Group 1 sensitivity is lower. Both methods perform comparably for cases with weak methylation data, concordantly classifying 5/8 cases alongside adjuvant variant data. MNP column represents classification as listed in MNP reference.

*

Misclassifications and classifications below confidence threshold 0.5.