TABLE 4.

Evaluation of measures meeting minimum criteria in ranked preference order

Rank	Outcome measures	Internal consistency	Reliability	Responsiveness	Feasibility
1	The Scenario Test (TST) (van der Meulen et al., 2010)	+	+	+	+
2	Communication Activities of Daily Living—3 (CADL‐3) (Holland et al., 2018)	+	+	n.r. (CADL‐2 +)	+
3	The Communication Effectiveness Index (CETI) (Lomas et al., 1989)	+	+	+	+
4	Measure of Participation in Conversation (MPC) (Kagan et al., 2004)	+	?	+	+
5	The Communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia (CCRSA) (Babbitt et al., 2011)	+	n.r.	+	+
6	American Speech–Language and Hearing Association Functional Assessment of Communication Skills for Adults (ASHA‐FACS) (Frattali et al., 1995)	+	+	n.r.	+
7	Aphasia Communication Outcome Measure (ACOM) (Doyle et al., 2008)	+	?	?	+
8	The Communication Participation Item Bank (CPIB) (Baylor et al., 2013)	+	n.r.	n.r.	+

Note: +, Positive evidence; ?, indeterminate or conflicting evidence; −, negative evidence.

n.r., Not reported.