TABLE 3.
Quality assessment of included studies.
CASP qualitative checklist | Chamberlain et al. (2017) | Doak et al. (2019) | Duquette and Stodel (2005) | Hamilton et al. (2020) | Petrenko et al. (2014) | Salmon (2008) | Sanders and Buck (2010) | Temple et al. (2021) | Thomas and Mukherjee (2019) | Watson et al. (2013) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clear statement of aim | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Qualitative methodology | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Research design | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Sampling | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Data collection | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Partial | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Researcher reflexivity | Partial | Partial | No | Partial | No | No | No | No | No | No |
Ethical consideration | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Partial | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Data analysis | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Partial | Yes |
Clear statement of findings | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Research value | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |