Skip to main content
. 2023 May 25;38(6):814–828. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4809

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Anti‐LRP6/DKK1 combination strategy provided superior protection against 5TGM1‐induced bone loss and vertebral bone strength compared to single treatment. (A) 3D representative images of femurs from naïve or 5TGM1‐bearing mice treated with either anti‐LRP6 Ab alone, anti‐LRP6/DKK1 Ab combination, or their respective isotypes for 21 days. (B) μCT‐derived (i) trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV, %), (ii) trabecular thickness (Tb.Th, mm), and (iii) trabecular number (Tb.N, N/mm) in the distal femoral metaphysis in all respective treatment groups at day 21. (C) μCT‐derived (i) trabecular BV/TV (%), (ii) Tb.Th (mm), and (iii) Tb.N (N/mm) in lumbar L4 vertebrae from each respective treatment groups at day 21. (D) Maximum load to failure (Max Load, N) of L4 lumbar vertebrae from each respective treatment group. Results plotted as mean ± SD. Ab = antibody; BM = bone marrow; CB = cortical bone; GP = growth plate; i.v. = intravenous; s.c. = subcutaneous; TB = trabecular bone.