Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 16;133(34):18821–18827. doi: 10.1002/ange.202104476

Table 1.

Isolated yields and regioisomeric ratios for the preparative scale cascade reactions described in Schemes 13.

Substrate

Product

MT

Yield[a]

Regioisomeric ratio[b]

(6‐OMe:7‐OMe)

(S)‐1

(S)‐6‐OMe‐1

RnCOMT

55 % (96 %)

95:5

(S)‐2

(S)‐6‐OMe‐2

RnCOMT

55 % (92 %)

95:5

(S)‐2

(S)‐6‐OMe‐2

MxSafC[c]

43 % (89 %)

60:40

(S)‐2

(S)‐6,7‐(OMe)22

MxSafC[c]

6 % (9 %)[d]

na

(S)‐3

(S)‐6,3′‐(OMe)23

RnCOMT

34 % (64 %)[e]

95:5

(S)‐3

(S)‐6,4′‐(OMe)23

Cj‐6‐OMT then MxSafC

27 % (70 %)[e]

100

(S)‐5

(S)‐6‐OMe‐5

RnCOMT

19 % (27 %)

95:5

(S)‐5

(S)‐6‐OMe‐5

MxSafC

20 % (31 %)

95:5

(S)‐6

(S)‐6‐OMe‐6

RnCOMT

44 % (90 %)

90:10

9

7‐OMe‐9

RnCOMT

40 %

10:90

9

6‐OMe‐9

MxSafC

56 % (94 %)[f]

90:10

10

7‐OMe‐10

RnCOMT

45 %[g] (90 %)

10:90

10

6‐OMe‐10

MxSafC

30 %[g] (89 %)

90:10

(S)‐11

(S)‐6‐OMe‐11

RnCOMT

33 % (40 %)

85:15

[a] Isolated yield (yield by HPLC analysis against product standards in parenthesis); [b] 6‐OMe:7‐OMe calculated by NMR; [c] reaction with 2 equivalents of ATP and L‐methionine; when an excess of methyl equivalents was used the dimethylated product (S)‐6,7‐(OMe)22 was observed; [d] the yield of (S)‐6,7‐(OMe)22 with 8 equiv of ATP and L‐methionine was 28 % (47 %); [e] some impurities were detected by HPLC; [f] reaction on a pure sample of 9. When carried out in a cascade coupled with NCS the yield was 64 % (not optimised); [g] reaction on a pure sample of 10.