Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Med. 2024 Feb 15;345:116684. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116684

Table 2.

Two-level Negative Binomial Models Predicting Depressive Symptoms from Overall Social Network Bridginga b

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5
Overall network bridging (WP) c 1.03** 1.02* 1.02 1.05** 1.04*
[1.01,1.05] [1.00,1.04] [1.00,1.04] [1.02,1.09] [1.01,1.08]
Overall network bridging (BP)d 1.02 1.04* 1.03+ 1.06* 1.07*
[0.99,1.06] [1.00,1.07] [1.00,1.06] [1.01,1.11] [1.01,1.12]
Age 65–74 at R1 (Ref. 57–64) 1.07 1.08 1.19+ 1.19+
[0.91,1.25] [0.93,1.25] [0.98,1.45] [0.99,1.43]
Age 75 + at R1 1.31+ 1.28+ 1.62** 1.49*
[0.97,1.77] [0.97,1.71] [1.16,2.27] [1.08,2.06]
Overall network bridging (WP) × Age 65–74 at R1 0.95+ 0.96+
(Ref. 57–64) [0.90,1.00] [0.91,1.00]
Overall network bridging (WP) × Age 75+ at R1 0.96 0.96*
[0.92,1.01] [0.92,1.00]
Overall network bridging (BP) × Age 65–74 at R1 0.94+ 0.95+
(Ref. 57–64) [0.89,1.01] [0.89,1.01]
Overall network bridging (BP) × Age 75+ at R1 0.92+ 0.92*
[0.84,1.01] [0.85,1.00]
Time-varying age 0.99 0.99 1.00 0.99
[0.98,1.01] [0.98,1.01] [0.98,1.02] [0.98,1.01]]
Female 1.13** 1.16** 1.15**
[1.04,1.23] [1.06,1.27] [1.05,1.26]
African American (Ref. White) 1.13 1.03 1.03
[0.97,1.31] [0.89,1.19] [0.88,1.19]
Hispanic 1.07 0.99 1.00
[0.87,1.33] [0.82,1.20] [0.83,1.21]
Marital status (Ref. married/partnered)
 Separated/divorced 0.97 1.01 1.02
[0.84,1.12] [0.88,1.16] [0.89,1.16]
 Widowed 1.24*** 1.26*** 1.27***
[1.10,1.39] [1.12,1.42] [1.13,1.42]
College education (1 = Yes) 0.80*** 0.81*** 0.81***
[0.72,0.89] [0.73,0.90] [0.73,0.90]
Currently Retired (1 = Yes) 0.95 0.95 0.95
[0.88,1.03] [0.88,1.03] [0.88,1.03]
Chronic illness 1.08*** 1.08*** 1.08***
[1.04,1.11] [1.04,1.11] [1.04,1.11]
Functional disability 1.34*** 1.34*** 1.34***
[1.22,1.48] [1.23,1.47] [1.22,1.47]
Social network size 0.94*** 0.96* 0.97 0.94*** 0.97
[0.91,0.97] [0.92,0.99] [0.94,1.01] [0.91,0.97] [0.94,1.01]
Proportion of kin 0.93 0.94 0.94
[0.81,1.06] [0.82,1.07] [0.83,1.07]
Perceived support 0.81*** 0.81***
[0.76,0.87] [0.76,0.87]
Perceived difficult ties 1.28*** 1.28***
[1.21,1.35] [1.21,1.35]

Fixed intercept (lnalpha) 0.25*** 0.24*** 0.24*** 0.24*** 0.24***
[0.21,0.29] [0.20,0.28] [0.20,0.29] [0.20,0.29] [0.20,0.28]
Random effect: variance of the intercept 1.87*** 1.62*** 1.49*** 1.84*** 1.49***
[1.72,2.03] [1.51,1.74] [1.40,1.59] [1.70,1.99] [1.40,1.59]

AIC 21900.2 21547.5 20992.2 21881.4 20993.9
BIC 21950.9 21693.3 21150.2 21976.5 21177.2
a

N of total person-years = 4,106. Estimates are weighted using NSHAP person weights and adjusted for attrition and selection using propensity scores. All models account for a multistage, clustered survey design. 95% confidence intervals in brackets.

+

p < 0.10,

*

p < 0.05,

**

p < 0.01,

***

p < 0.001

b

All models report incidence rate ratio and include round dummy indicators where t = 1–3. R1 = Round 1

c

Person-mean across waves (i.e., time-varying). WP=within-person.

d

Person-mean centered scores (i.e., time-invariant). BP=between-person.