Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Card Fail. 2023 Sep 25;30(3):452–459. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.08.024

Table 3.

Comparison between HF Dashboard 1.0 and 2.0

1.0 2.0
Definition
HFrEF LVEF ≤40% LVEF ≤40%
HFmrEF None LVEF 41%−49%
HFpEF LVEF >40% LVEF ≥50%
Business Rules
Documented HF? Yes Yes
LVEF used Lowest in past 3 years Most recent
Study used Any study High-quality image if within 1 year; otherwise, most recent image
Performance: HFrEF
Sensitivity 97.9% 83.0%
Specificity 35.1% 91.9%
Accuracy 54.1% 89.2%
PPV 39.6% 81.9%
NPV 97.5% 92.5%
Performance: HFmrEF
Sensitivity 84.1%
Specificity 89.1%
Accuracy 88.0%
PPV 68.7%
NPV 95.2%
Performance: HFpEF
Sensitivity 34.9% 81.6%
Specificity 93.7% 93.7%
Accuracy 53.9% 88.0%
PPV 96.7% 92.1%
NPV 39.6% 85.0%

HF, heart failure; HFmrEF, heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.