Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 18.
Published in final edited form as: Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2019 Jul 29;10(6):101264. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2019.07.008

Table 3.

Unadjusted and Adjusted Odds Ratios for Use of Chemical or Natural Pesticide Treatments by Demographics, Knowledge, Attitudes, and History of Tickborne Disease, Connecticut and Maryland, 2016–2017.

Applying chemical pesticide to yard (n = 1713)
Applying natural pesticide to yard (n = 1603)
% uOR (95% CI) aOR (95% CI) % uOR (95% CI) aOR (95% CI)
Age
≥50 22% .86 (.67-1.10) 15% .83 (.61-1.12)
18-49 25% 17%
Education
College/Grad School 24% 1.39* (.96-1.99) 16% 1.23 (.80-1.89)
Elementary/Middle/High School 18% 13%
Income
≥$100,000 25% 1.29**(1.01-1.65) 1.29** (1.01-1.65) 18% 1.37**(1.03-1.84) 1.40**(1.05-1.88)
< $100,000 20% 14%
Sex
Female 22% .87 (.70-1.10) 18% 1.45** (1.10-1.90) 1.43** (1.08-1.91)
Male 24% 13%
Self-rated knowledge of LD
Some/A lot 24% 1.20 (.89-1.62) 15% .93 (.66-1.31)
None/A little 20% 16%
Perceived prevalence of LD
Common/Very Common 24% 1.01 (.80-1.28) 15% .94 (.70-1.24)
Rare/Somewhat Common 23% 16%
Perceived severity of LD
Very Severe 22% .92 (.73-1.17) 16% 1.05 (.79-1.39)
Not/Moderately Severe 24% 15%
Perceived likelihood of contracting TBD next year
Very Likely 20% .82 (.52-1.28) 18% 1.20 (.74-1.95)
Unlikely/Moderately Likely 23% 16%
Ever been diagnosed with TBD
Yes 19% .75** (.58-.97) 15% 1.01 (.75-1.36)
No 24% 15%
State
Connecticut 21% .83* (.65-1.1) 14% .86 (.64-1.2)
Maryland 24% 16%

uOR: unadjusted odds ratio; aOR: adjusted odds ratio.

Adjusted models controlled for significant covariates and state.

*

p value < .20.

**

p value < .05

+

p value < .01.