Table 2.
The prevalence of lameness in the individual examined farms.
| Farm examined | Number of animals examined | Number of lame animals |
|---|---|---|
| Farm 1 | 10 | 2 (20.0%) |
| Farm 2 | 24 | 3 (12.5%) |
| Farm 3 | 10 | 2 (20.0%) |
| Farm 4 | 6 | 1 (16.7%) |
| Farm 5 | 6 | 1 (16.7%) |
| Farm 6 | 9 | 3 (33.3%) |
| Farm 7 | 52 | 4 (7.7%) |
| Farm 8 | 22 | 4 (18.2%) |
| Farm 9 | 15 | 4 (26.7%) |
| Farm 10 | 12 | 2 (16.7%) |
| Farm 11 | 24 | 4 (16.7%) |
| Farm 12 | 20 | 3 (15.0%) |
| Farm 13 | 20 | 2 (10.0%) |
| Farm 14 | 5 | 1 (20.0%) |
| Farm 15 | 6 | 0 (0.0%) |
| Farm 16 | 56 | 5 (8.9%) |
| Farm 17 | 129 | 2 (1.6%) |
| Farm 18 | 7 | 0 (0.0%) |
| Farm 19 | 7 | 2 (28.6%) |
| Total | 440 | 45 (10.2%) |