Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 5;15:1337463. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1337463

Table 2.

The mean comparison between qhir1+/qhir8+ and qhir1+/qhir8− genotypes of each F3 family on haploid induction rate (HIR, %).

Population name Gene combination HIR (%) PNU TPN p-value PVE (%)
K8/BHI306-F3 qhir1+/qhir8+ 9.36 A 14 32 1.05E−03 ** 36
qhir1+/qhir8− 4.29 a 18
K11/BHI306-F3 qhir1+/qhir8+ 9.48 A 10 54 4.01E−02 * 17
qhir1+/qhir8− 4.89 a 44
KHI-49/BHI306-F3 qhir1+/qhir8+ 3.85 B 31 52 6.21E−08 ** 39
qhir1+/qhir8− 1.18 b 21
KHI-54/BHI306-F3 qhir1+/qhir8+ 5.61B 41 99 1.91E−07 ** 33
qhir1+/qhir8− 1.53 b 58

PNU the number of plants; TPN the total number of plants; PVE proportion of variance in phenotypes explained (%).

HIR means (%) followed by different uppercase letters within the same qhir1+/qhir8+ genotype are significantly different based on Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) Test at 5%.

HIR means (%) followed by different lowercase letters within the same qhir1+/qhir8− genotype are significantly different based on Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) Test at 5%.

* and ** data significant through paired samples t-test at P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively.