Table 3.
Technologies for biomethane generation from wastewater
| Technologies | Process | Typical Systems | Scale of the technology | Advantages | Limitations | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaerobic digestion | Biological process that converts organic matter in wastewater into biogas | anaerobic sequencing batch reactor, upflow anaerobic sludge blanket | Full scale |
Can treat domestic sewage, industrial wastewater, and agricultural waste Can reduce the volume and mass of the organic waste Can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by capturing and utilising methane |
Requires careful control of process conditions to maintain efficient operation, can generate odour, can produce a high concentration of residual sludge, and requires a long retention time | (Kumar et al. 2021) |
| Membrane bioreactors | Combined with anaerobic digestion | Consists of a bioreactor tank, a membrane filtration system, and a control system | Lab-scale and full-scale | High biogas production, reduced footprint, lower sludge production, lower odour emissions | High energy consumption, high capital costs, membrane fouling, sensitivity to shock loads | (Elmoutez et al. 2022) |
| Microbial Electrolysis Cells | microbes to catalyse the reduction of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other organic compounds to produce methane (CH4) through an electrochemical process | consists of an anode and a cathode separated by a membrane | Primarily lab-scale, some pilot-scale | High energy efficiency, reduced carbon footprint, flexibility | High cost, low methane yield, technical challenges | (Koul et al. 2022) |
| Upcycling (co-digestion) | Use other waste materials such as food waste or agricultural waste or algal biomass as feedstock | Involves collecting organic waste materials, and processing them through anaerobic digestion or microalgae cultivation on wastewater | From small to full | Waste reduction, local production, economic benefits | Technical challenges and high capital cost | (Tsapekos et al. 2021); (Vaz et al. 2023); (Deng et al. 2023) |
| Biogas Upgrading | Upgrade biogas to biomethane | Water scrubbing, pressure swing adsorption, membrane separation | Varying levels of maturity, with some being widely implemented and others still in developmental stages | Suitable for grid injection, flexible in handling various input gas compositions |
Involve high capital and operational costs Chemical scrubbing can be energy-intensive |
(Martín-Hernández et al. 2020); (Assunção et al. 2021) |
| Thermal hydrolysis | Pre-treatment process | Break down cell walls and complex organic molecules to make it easier for microbes to digest | Increase biogas production and reduce pathogen levels | Energy intensive and requires high capital investment | (Balasundaram et al. 2023) |