Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 20;63(3):987–993. doi: 10.1007/s00394-023-03319-1

Table 2.

Association of plasma boron concentrations with all-cause mortality using Cox proportional hazards regression models

Overall sample Tertiles
1a 2 3
Individuals, n (%) 863 (100.0%) 287 (33.3%) 288 (33.4%) 288 (33.4%)
Deceased, n (%) 99 (11.5%) 26 (9.1%) 24 (8.3%) 49 (17.0%)
Plasma boron concentrations in µg/L 31.9 [22.9; 43.5] 20.5 [17.1; 22.9] 31.9 [28.7; 35.2] 50.9 [43.5; 60.5]
HR [95% CI] for all-cause mortality associated with plasma boron
5-unit-increment
Model 1 1.07 [1.03–1.11] Ref 0.86 [0.49–1.50] 1.85 [1.15–2.97]
Model 2 1.03 [0.99–1.07] Ref 0.57 [0.32–1.00] 1.01 [0.62–1.66]
Model 3 1.03 [0.99–1.07] Ref 0.63 [0.35–1.12] 1.14 [0.68–1.93]

HR are provided for the second and third tertile as compared to the bottom tertile, and per 5-unit-increment in plasma boron. Associations are in hazard ratios [95% confidence interval] with bold figures indicating significant associations (p < 0.05). Model 1: unadjusted. Model 2: adjusted for sex and age. Model 3: Model 2 further adjusted for body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, education, smoking status, and physical activity

CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio

aTertile 1 was set as reference