Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 5;15:1343188. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1343188

Table 2.

Comparisons of MCCB scores among three groups of participants ( x¯ ±S).

Variables SCZ-ct
(n=32)
SCZ-nct
(n=30)
HC-nct
(n=39)
F P η2 Post-hoc
p, Bonferroni-adjusted
SCZ-ct
vs.
SCZ-nct
SCZ-ct
vs.
HC-nct
SCZ-nct
vs.
HC-nct
MCCB 43.70 ± 1.77 46.76 ± 1.67 55.16 ± 1.60 11.20 <0.001 0.188 0.756 <0.001 0.001
SP 44.59 ± 1.45 44.65 ± 1.37 55.01 ± 1.31 17.62 <0.001 0.266 1.000 <0.001 <0.001
A/V 45.44 ± 1.95 45.86 ± 1.84 54.64 ± 1.77 7.28 <0.001 0.130 1.000 0.005 0.003
WM 44.13 ± 1.86 45.91 ± 1.76 52.29 ± 1.69 5.02 0.008 0.094 1.000 0.013 0.033
VEL 44.47 ± 1.95 47.60 ± 1.85 53.80 ± 1.77 5.68 0.005 0.105 0.725 0.004 0.056
VIL 48.30 ± 1.81 50.36 ± 1.71 52.70 ± 1.64 1.40 0.253 0.028 1.000 0.296 0.996
RPS 49.42 ± 1.90 47.19 ± 1.79 53.90 ± 1.72 3.63 0.030 0.070 1.000 0.322 0.026
SC 43.85 ± 2.23 51.83 ± 2.11 51.87 ± 2.03 4.17 0.018 0.079 0.030 0.046 1.000

MCCB, SCZ-ct, schizophrenia patients with a history of childhood trauma; SCZ-nct, schizophrenia patients without a history of childhood trauma; HC-nct, healthy controls without a history of childhood trauma; MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery; SP, Speed of Processing; A/V, Attention/Vigilance; WM, Working Memory; VEL, Verbal Learning; VIL, Visual Learning; RPS, Reasoning and Problem Solving; SC, Social Cognition.