Table 2.
Second survey results by pilot participants and non-participants, subdivided by perspective on curriculum integration and content retention
| Survey question | Anatomage pilot participants (N) | Strongly agree | Somewhat agree | Neither agree nor disagree | Somewhat disagree | Strongly disagree |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perspective on curriculum integration | ||||||
| 1. The Anatomage table should be included in anatomy curriculum | Participant (20) | 45.00% | 45.00% | 10.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Non-participant (22) | 18.18% | 68.18% | 4.55% | 9.09% | 0.00% | |
| 2. The Anatomage table is superior to traditional teaching methods for anatomy | Participant (20) | 5.00% | 50.00% | 30.00% | 15.00% | 0.00% |
| Non-participant (22) | 0.00% | 40.91% | 40.91% | 13.64% | 4.55% | |
| 3. I feel motivated to learn anatomy using the Anatomage table | Participant (20) | 40.00% | 40.00% | 10.00% | 5.00% | 5.00% |
| Non-participant (22) | 9.09% | 40.91% | 36.36% | 13.64% | 0.00% | |
| Perspective on content retention | ||||||
| 4. The Anatomage table helped me learn the bones of the body | Participant (20) | 55.00% | 30.00% | 15.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Non-participant (22) | 27.27% | 36.36% | 22.73% | 9.09% | 4.55% | |
| 5. The Anatomage table helped me learn the muscles of the body | Participant (20) | 15.00% | 55.00% | 30.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Non-participant (22) | 13.64% | 45.40% | 27.20% | 4.55% | 9.09% | |
| 6. The Anatomage table helped me contextualize structures in the body | Participant (20) | 60.00% | 30.00% | 10.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Non-participant (22) | 45.45% | 50.00% | 4.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |
| 7. The Anatomage table helped me succeed on exams | Participant (20) | 25.00% | 45.00% | 20.00% | 10.0% | 0.00% |
| Non-participant (22) | 13.64% | 36.36% | 40.91% | 0.00% | 9.09% |