Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 19;14:6527. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57167-y

Table 1.

Classification results from anterior and posterior classified channels using spectral clustering and peak detection.

Classification results S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 Average
Ant. Pst. Ant. Pst. Ant. Pst. Ant. Pst. Ant. Pst. Ant. Pst.
n (truth; Ant. or Pst.) 153 98 124 114 137 116 145 105 100 155 131.8 117.6
n (classified; Ant. or Pst.) spectral clustering 160 91 126 112 131 122 146 104 108 147 134.2 115.2
Accuracy spectral clustering 96.4% 96.6% 95.2% 97.2% 90.6% 95.2%
n (classified; Ant. or Pst.) peak detection 149 102 106 132 144 109 134 116 127 128 132 117.4
Accuracy peak detection 96.6% 92.6% 86.6% 94.3% 89.5% 91.9%

The table compares the channels as anterior or posterior to the central sulcus using the spectral clustering and peak detection method for five subjects. The number of ground truth channels for each subject is shown in row 1. The number of channels classified as anterior or posterior for each subject using spectral clustering and peak detection are given in rows 2 and 4, respectively. Rows 3 and 5 show the final classification accuracy with the average accuracy across all subjects in the last column.