. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 19.

Published in final edited form as: J Radiol Clin Imaging. 2023 Dec 29;6(4):197–207. doi: 10.26502/jrci.2809088

Table 3:

Analysis of cardiac structure and function versus clinical values from patients in the study.

		SLICC	CRP	Fasting Insulin	ESR
EF (%)	r	−0.545
EF (%)	p	0.057
LVSVi (mL/m²)	r		0.528
LVSVi (mL/m²)	p		0.066
CO/BSA (L/min/m²)	r		0.566
CO/BSA (L/min/m²)	p		0.047
LVMi (g/m²)	r			−0.664	−0.604
LVMi (g/m²)	p			0.031	0.032
Radial Strain (%)	r	−0.743
Radial Strain (%)	p	0.005
Circumferential Strain (%)	r	0.669
Circumferential Strain (%)	p	0.014
Long strain (%)	r	0.501	0.528
Long strain (%)	p	0.083	0.066
Native T1 (ms)	r	0.621
Native T1 (ms)	p	0.035
T2 (ms)	r			0.701
T2 (ms)	p			0.02
ECV (%)	r			−0.664
ECV (%)	p			0.031

A correlation matrix was constructed to determine potential relationships between cMRI values and clinical laboratory findings. Associations are shown and are represented as positive associations in the green boxes and negative associations in the orange boxes. The Spearman r coefficient and p value is shown in each case. EF: ejection fraction; LVSVi: left ventricular systolic volume index; CI: cardiac index; LVMi: left ventricular mass index; ECV: extracellular volume.