Skip to main content
mSystems logoLink to mSystems
. 2024 Feb 9;9(3):e01208-23. doi: 10.1128/msystems.01208-23

Snowball: a novel gene family required for developmental patterning of fruiting bodies of mushroom-forming fungi (Agaricomycetes)

Csenge Földi 1,2, Zsolt Merényi 1, Bálint Balázs 1, Árpád Csernetics 1, Nikolett Miklovics 1, Hongli Wu 1, Botond Hegedüs 1, Máté Virágh 1, Zhihao Hou 1, Xiao-Bin Liu 1, László Galgóczy 1,3, László G Nagy 1,
Editor: Benjamin E Wolfe4
PMCID: PMC10949477  PMID: 38334416

ABSTRACT

The morphogenesis of sexual fruiting bodies of fungi is a complex process determined by a genetically encoded program. Fruiting bodies reached the highest complexity levels in the Agaricomycetes; yet, the underlying genetics is currently poorly known. In this work, we functionally characterized a highly conserved gene termed snb1, whose expression level increases rapidly during fruiting body initiation. According to phylogenetic analyses, orthologs of snb1 are present in almost all agaricomycetes and may represent a novel conserved gene family that plays a substantial role in fruiting body development. We disrupted snb1 using CRISPR/Cas9 in the agaricomycete model organism Coprinopsis cinerea. snb1 deletion mutants formed unique, snowball-shaped, rudimentary fruiting bodies that could not differentiate caps, stipes, and lamellae. We took advantage of this phenotype to study fruiting body differentiation using RNA-Seq analyses. This revealed differentially regulated genes and gene families that, based on wild-type RNA-Seq data, were upregulated early during development and showed tissue-specific expression, suggesting a potential role in differentiation. Taken together, the novel gene family of snb1 and the differentially expressed genes in the snb1 mutants provide valuable insights into the complex mechanisms underlying developmental patterning in the Agaricomycetes.

IMPORTANCE

Fruiting bodies of mushroom-forming fungi (Agaricomycetes) are complex multicellular structures, with a spatially and temporally integrated developmental program that is, however, currently poorly known. In this study, we present a novel, conserved gene family, Snowball (snb), termed after the unique, differentiation-less fruiting body morphology of snb1 knockout strains in the model mushroom Coprinopsis cinerea. snb is a gene of unknown function that is highly conserved among agaricomycetes and encodes a protein of unknown function. A comparative transcriptomic analysis of the early developmental stages of differentiated wild-type and non-differentiated mutant fruiting bodies revealed conserved differentially expressed genes which may be related to tissue differentiation and developmental patterning fruiting body development.

KEYWORDS: mushroom development, unannotated genes, Basidiomycota, tissue differentiation, Coprinopsis cinerea, fruiting body

INTRODUCTION

The development of sexual fruiting bodies in the Agaricomycetes (mushroom-forming fungi) is one of the most complex ontogenetic processes in the fungal kingdom (14). Fruiting bodies are complex multicellular structures that facilitate the dispersal of sexual spores by sophisticated and often cryptic mechanisms, such as lifting the hymenophore (spore-producing tissue) above ground (2, 5), utilizing the power of wind or forcible spore discharge, among others. The emergence of three-dimensional fruiting bodies on the vegetative mycelium, which has fractal-like dimensions, represents a transition in complexity level and is a developmental process regulated by a genetically encoded program. At the initiation of fruiting body development, hyphal aggregates, hyphal knots, appear on the vegetative mycelium. These structures develop into stage 1 primordia, in which developmental patterning first becomes visible with the emergence of tissues representing the cap, stipe, and veil (7). Deciphering the molecular networks behind fruiting body development is a century-old challenge in mycology. Several aspects of fruiting body development are already known, from classic histology (6), to forward and reverse genetics or other approaches (7). These include the importance of structural (e.g., hydrophobins (8), cell wall biosynthetic and modifying enzymes (911) and regulatory genes (e.g., transcription factors (1216), chromatin remodelers (17, 18), kinases (19), or signal transduction genes (20, 21). However, the genetic knowledge accumulated over the years covers only a small fraction of what conceivably constitutes the developmental program and does not currently allow general principles that are applicable across species to shine through individual studies (22).

The recent proliferation of -omics studies in the Agaricomycetes has uncovered a large number of developmentally regulated genes, defined as ones that show considerable expression dynamics during development or between tissue types (2327). However, there is currently a large gap between -omics studies and genetic analysis of developmental genes. While the former can identify hundreds to thousands of developmentally regulated genes, functional analysis of these is lagging, with orders of magnitudes fewer genes with a known function, in any species (28). Uncovering the precise function of these genes could fill the gaps in our understanding of the complex molecular networks underlying fruiting body development.

A particularly interesting group of developmentally regulated genes encode proteins without known conserved domains (e.g., Pfam, InterPro) or with domains of unknown function (DUF). The functional annotation of these genes is difficult by commonly used homology-based methods, and represent the “dark proteome” encoded by the genomes of various organisms. Such genes might constitute new families or even novel folds with hitherto unknown functionalities, as demonstrated recently across the whole protein universe (29) or in the context of fungal examples (30). Unannotated genes are widespread in fungal genomes and can represent truly novel gene families but also spurious open reading frames that stem from gene annotation artifacts (31). Thus, although genes without known functions can conceivably encode new functionalities, unlocking their function is a complex problem.

The latest developmental -omics studies identified hundreds of unannotated and poorly known genes in fruiting body transcriptomes, many of which displayed considerable sequence conservation and even showed conserved expression patterns. A recent analysis of twelve mushroom-forming species found that a large proportion of conserved developmentally regulated genes is, actually, unannotated or encode proteins with DUFs and that the genome of Coprinopsis cinerea alone contains 158 such families (28). On the other hand, less than a handful of them have been functionally characterized in mushroom-forming fungi. Notable examples related to fruiting body development include PriA, which is strongly induced in primordia Lentinula edodes but its exact functions are unknown (32), or Spc14 and Spc33 which are involved in the formation of the septal pore cap in Schizophyllum commune (33). Despite these examples, the vast majority of these genes remain in the dark and thus the roles they fulfill during development are also left uncharted.

In this study, we set out to functionally characterize a gene of unknown function in C. cinerea, a widely used model system in fungal developmental biology (7). We identified C. cinerea 493979 which exhibits high levels of conservation in the Agaricomycetes and based on its expression patterns across species, may play a role in fruiting body development. We show that its deletion results in severely stunted, snowball-like fruiting bodies. Based on the phenotype, we term it snb1 (‘snowball-1’) and find that the fruiting defect stems from the failure of tissue differentiation in the primordia. We take advantage of this undifferentiated phenotype to gain insights into genes related to the emergence of tissues within fruiting bodies by RNA-Seq analyses.

RESULTS

A recent study identified 921 conserved developmentally expressed gene families in 12 agaricomycete species, of which 158 represent orthogroups with unknown function (28). Among these, the C. cinerea snb1 gene (C. cinerea AmutBmut1 strain protein ID: 493979, C. cinerea Okayama-7 protein ID: CC1G_01874) stands out because its orthologs showed developmentally dynamic expression in C. cinerea and the other 11 species. In C. cinerea, the expression of snb1 is negligible in vegetative mycelia but increased 144- and 240-fold in the initial steps of fruiting body formation, secondary hyphal knots, and stage 1 primordia, respectively (26).

Targeted disruption of snb1

To delete the C. cinerea snb1 gene, we applied the CRISPR/Cas9 system, comprising a ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex with a single guide RNA (sgRNA) and the Cas9 protein together with a DNA repair template (34). To perform this, we utilized the C. cinerea AmutBmut1 strain, which is a p-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) auxotrophic homokaryotic strain, which we denote here as the wild type (wt). We obtained three independent mutants, in which PCR analysis using primers upstream of the locus and in the pab1 gene verified the integration of the repair template into the Cas9 cleavage site (Fig. S1).

The lack of C. cinerea snb1 results in spherical, poorly differentiated, snowball-like fruiting bodies

We measured the growth rate of vegetative mycelium on rich media (YMG and complete Fries) and under starvation conditions [Fries medium without carbon (-C) or nitrogen (-N) sources] (35). The growth rate of the wt and deletion (Δsnb1) strains did not differ significantly under these conditions (two-way ANOVA, P = 0.460). There was no significant difference between the wt and Δsnb1 strains in either fresh or dry mass after 6 days of growth on YMG medium at 28°C (one-way ANOVA, P = 0.993 and P = 0.353, respectively, results not shown). All three independent Δsnb1 strains behaved the same way.

The fruiting bodies of the Δsnb1 strains differed remarkably from those of the wt. Under a synchronized fruiting protocol, in which a 2-h light irradiation triggers fruiting (24), both wt and Δsnb1 strains produced well-defined rings of secondary hyphal knots, approximately 24 h pLI (Fig. S2). However, while wt hyphal knots developed into stage 1 and 2 primordia with well-discernible cap, stipe, gill, and universal veil, all independent Δsnb1 strains produced white, spherical, snowball-like structures with apparently no or little differentiation (Fig. 1). Based on this morphology, we termed C. cinerea ID: 493979 gene snb1, referring to the snowball-like appearance of mutant fruiting bodies. As development progressed, rudimentary, apically formed cell-dense structures became visible on the fourth day pLI in cross-sections of fruiting bodies (Fig. 1). The fruiting bodies were unable to form cap, stipe, and gills; hence, they were not able to sporulate. Nevertheless, the fruiting bodies remained spherical with apical structures resembling the rudiments of the universal veil present. Due to the absence of a cap, the partial veil was missing. Consequently, Δsnb1 strains were also not able to produce mature fruiting bodies and spores (Fig. 1).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Cross-sections of developing fruiting bodies of wt and Δsnb1 Coprinopsis cinerea strains during the first 5 days post-light induction (pLI). Strains were grown on YMG medium with halved glucose content at 28°C. Scale bar = 1 mm.

The reintroduction of the wt snb1 gene into the Δsnb1 strains rescued the mutant phenotype. The integration of the wt snb1 gene was validated by PCR (Fig. S3A). The complemented Δsnb1 strains were able to produce fruiting bodies that were identical to those of the wt strain (Fig. S3B).

Without light induction, wt C. cinerea primordia develop into dark stipes, which results from the elongation of the basal part (nodulus), while the stipe and cap remain rudimentary (Fig. 2) (36). The Δsnb1 strains were not able to produce dark stipes under constant dark conditions, rather, they produced spherical fruiting structures scattered on the vegetative mycelia. These observations suggest that the mechanisms responsible for nodulus elongation in the wt strain are inactive in the Δsnb1 strains.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Fruiting bodies of wt and Δsnb1 Coprinopsis cinerea strains after 2 weeks of growth in the dark. (A) The wt fruiting bodies elongated in darkness (dark stipes tilted by 90o). (B) Δsnb1 fruiting bodies expanded laterally and remained spherical, and were unable to produce dark stipes. Scale bar = 2 mm.

Δsnb1 strains show higher tolerance to the fruiting inhibitor LiCl

LiCl suppresses fruiting body formation presumably through the inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3) (37). To test whether Δsnb1 is sensitive to LiCl, we investigated the effect of LiCl on wt and Δsnb1 fruiting body development (Fig. 3). The untreated wt developed mature fruiting bodies while fruiting body development stopped at stage 3 primordia in the presence of 0.5 g/l LiCl. This was a lower LiCl inhibitory concentration than expected based on the literature, yet the effect was similar to that previously reported (37). At higher LiCl concentrations (1–2 g/L), the growth of wt strain was arrested at the hyphal knot stage and did not continue even after two weeks of incubation. Therefore, we used a more resolved LiCl concentration gradient, up to 2 g/L. By contrast, fruiting body development was not inhibited in the Δsnb1 strain up to 1 g/L LiCl. In these, an elongation of the basal part of the fruiting body was observed. At higher LiCl concentrations (1.5 and 2 g/L), Δsnb1 primordia were also arrested approximately at stage 1 primordium. Based on these observations, we conclude that the Δsnb1 strain is less sensitive to the repressive effect of LiCl on fruiting body development.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

The effect of LiCl on Coprinopsis cinerea fruiting body development. Pictures represent the final developmental stages after 2 weeks of incubation on a YMG medium with halved glucose content and increasing concentrations of LiCl. (A) Top view of wt and Δsnb1 colonies. The vegetative mycelia of the strains were grown under alternating dark and light cycles, leading to the formation of ring-like structures on the mycelia. (B) Whole and sectioned fruiting bodies of wt and Δsnb1 strain.

Domain composition and predicted structure of the SNB1 hypothetical protein

An InterPro search revealed that the predicted SNB1 comprises two disordered loop regions and a domain of unknown function (DUF6533; IPR045340). The latter is a basidiomycete-specific short, conserved region found in fungal integral membrane proteins [(38); version: InterPro 96.0]. WoLFPSORT predicted that SNB1 is localized in the plasma membrane. According to DeepTMHMM, it contains seven transmembrane helices with an extracellular N-terminus and an intracellular C-terminus (Fig. 4A and B). The tertiary structure of SNB1 was predicted by AlphaFold, which indicated the arrangement of the seven transmembrane domains and suggested a long, albeit poorly resolved intracellular loop region.

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Structural and phylogenetic analysis of SNB1. Based on predictions made by (A) DeepTMHMM and (B) AlphaFold (https://alphafold.ebi.ac.uk/entry/A8N2R0), SNB1 possesses seven transmembrane domains. The N-terminus of SNB1 is oriented toward the extracellular environment, while the C-terminus faces the intracellular space. (C) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree showing copy numbers of snb1 in 109 species. Ascomycota was used as an outgroup. Coprinopsis cinerea AmutBmut1 is highlighted with red, which has four snb1 paralogs. For detailed data, see Fig. S4A.

Phylogenetic analysis of SNB1 orthologs

We used a published data set (22) to identify homologs of SNB1 across 109 fungal species. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that the gene family of SNB1 is absent in the Ascomycota, whereas it is conserved in the Basidiomycota (Fig. 4C).

The most distant homologs of SNB1 were identified in the Pucciniomycotina and Ustilaginomycotina; however, no homologs were found in the Tremellomycetes and Dacrymycetes. Most species of the Agaricomycetes contain 1–3 copies, while members of the Agaricales have slightly higher copy numbers. For example, Psathyrellaceae (where C. cinerea belongs) species have 4–5 homologs. A gene tree-species tree reconciliation analysis and mapping of ancestral gene copy numbers suggest that ancestral copy numbers have been relatively stable during agaricomycete evolution. We did not identify major expansions or contractions of the gene family in any larger taxon, except the loss of the family in Tremello- and Dacrymycetes. The genome of C. cinerea encodes four members of the snb1 family (snb1, 292504, 407873, and 500548). Among these only snb1 was upregulated at the early stages of the fruiting body development, which suggests that its paralogs have other functions.

Among the homologs of SNB1, the orthogroup encompassing it originated in early Agaricomycetes and is found in extant taxa belonging to the Auriculariales, Tulasnellales, and more derived orders (Fig. S4A). Based on data published previously (22, 26, 3943), we verified that orthologs of SNB1 in other species showed a similar expression pattern during fruiting body development (Fig. S4B), suggesting that SNB1 orthologs are universally dynamically expressed during the development of agaricomycete fruiting bodies. This observation implies that members of this orthogroup probably play a pivotal role in this process, ultimately forming a new gene family related to fruiting body development.

RNA-Seq analysis reveals transcriptomic changes in Δsnb1 mutants during fruiting body initiation

Based on previous transcriptomic data sets, snb1 expression is almost undetectable in vegetative mycelia but strongly increases during fruiting body initiation (26), which, in conjunction with the observed phenotype, suggests that snb1 may play an essential role in early events of fruiting body development. Our phenotyping data indicated that the Δsnb1 strain is defective in the differentiation of cap and stipe tissues. We took advantage of this fact to get insights into the differentiation program of C. cinerea fruiting bodies by RNA-Seq analysis. To investigate the genes that are differentially expressed in the absence of SNB1 and thus might be associated with the lack of proper fruiting body differentiation, we obtained gene expression profiles during fruiting body initiation in the wt and the Δsnb1 strain. Because the expression of snb1 was negligible in the vegetative mycelium and there were no changes in the growth rate, we did not expect differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in that stage. Therefore, we examined the earliest, manually collectable developmental stages, secondary hyphal knots (wt: d =~ 200 µm, Δsnb1: d =~ 550 µm, 24 h pLI), which are undifferentiated in both strains, and stage 1 primordia (wt: d =~ 500 µm, Δsnb1: d =~ 750–900 µm, 48 h pLI), in three biological replicates (Fig. S2). Although secondary hyphal knots of the Δsnb1 strain were slightly larger than those of wt, both were undifferentiated and had similar internal organization. By contrast, stage 1 primordia of the wt had clearly visible cap and stipe tissues, while those of Δsnb1 remained undifferentiated (Fig. S2).

RNA-Seq analysis revealed a total of 1,299 DEGs that showed significant (P ≦ 0.05, fold-change (FC) >2) expression alteration in the Δsnb1 strain compared to wt 24 h and 48 h pLI. At 24 h pLI, in the secondary hyphal knots, we found 177 downregulated and 218 upregulated DEGs in the Δsnb1 strain. At 48 h pLI which corresponds to stage 1 primordium, we identified 516 downregulated and 650 upregulated DEGs (Table S2). In total, 574 DEGs and 727 DEGs were down- and upregulated significantly in at least one sample, respectively. A total of 267 genes were significantly differentially expressed (P ≦ 0.05) at both time points, among these 119 were downregulated and 141 were upregulated at both time points, and two were differently regulated at the two time points. The higher number of DEGs at 48 h pLI is consistent with the greater divergence of the morphologies of wt and Δsnb1 strains as development progresses.

We functionally characterized DEGs using Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis. This showed a significant (P 0.05) overrepresentation of 93 GO terms (Fig. S5; Table S3), which were mostly generic terms that are hard to interpret in the context of fruiting body development. Therefore, we chose to characterize DEGs using comparisons to previously published data for C. cinerea and manual classification of developmentally regulated genes.

Krizsán et al. (2019) categorized genes as “FB-init” if their expression increased at least fourfold in hyphal knots and stage 1 primordia, relative to vegetative mycelium. We found that 236 downregulated DEGs (41.11%) belonged to the “FB-init” category, while only 31 upregulated DEGs (4.26%) could be classified into this group (Fig. 5A). This suggests that genes downregulated in Δsnb1 are transcriptionally relevant to early developmental events, during which the main tissue types emerge.

Fig 5.

Fig 5

Results of RNA-Seq analysis. (A) Heatmap of the 1,299 differentially expressed genes. (B) Functional categories of developmentally regulated genes according to Nagy et al. (2023). Asterisks indicate the significant enrichment of DEGs in a given category (one-tailed Fisher’s exact test, *P ≦ 0.05, **P ≦ 0.01). (C) Heatmap displaying the normalized expression levels of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) within the 14 functional categories.

Furthermore, we reevaluated the data set of Krizsán et al. (2019) to identify genes exhibiting tissue-enriched expression. For this, we used the young fruiting body stage, in which data are available separately for the cap, gills, and stipes. In total, we found 2,554 tissue-enriched genes. Of the Δsnb1 DEGs, 582 were tissue enriched, 333 (58.01%) showed downregulation, and 250 (34.39%) upregulation in the Δsnb1 strain. One DEG overlapped, this was significantly upregulated at 24 h pLI and downregulated at 48 h pLI. The high ratio of tissue-specific downregulated DEGs underpins our speculation that examining DEGs in the Δsnb1 strain can reveal genes associated with tissue differentiation.

Upregulated genes could result either from processes becoming activated only in the mutant, or from differences in tissue mass ratios (i.e., transcript being relatively more dominant because the mutant is composed of a single tissue). With the latter being an RNA-Seq artifact, we think upregulated DEGs are less interesting from the perspective of differentiation. Therefore, in subsequent analyses, we pay more attention to downregulated DEGs.

To better interpret the functions of DEGs, we classified them into 18 manually curated functional categories defined for conserved development-related genes, which cover 1,410 genes of C. cinerea (28). In this way, 205 DEGs were classified into fourteen functional categories (Fig. 5B and C; Table S2). Overall, ∆snb1 DEGs are significantly enriched (P = 1.004 × 10−12, one-tailed Fisher’s exact test) in the conserved functional categories, indicating that, DEGs include a considerable proportion of conserved genes and that overlaying DEGs with these functional categories provides a good basis to examine processes altered in the mutant. DEGs were significantly enriched in nine categories (Fig. 5B, one-tailed Fisher’s exact test, P ≦ 0.05). The most strongly enriched categories (P ≦ 0.01, one-tailed Fisher’s exact test) contain transcriptional regulators, transporters, secondary metabolism genes, basic metabolism-related genes, conserved unannotated genes, and functionally poorly known genes. Next, we briefly summarize the enriched functional categories and discuss C. cinerea DEGs belonging to these, including both conserved genes and those specific to C. cinerea.

Basic metabolism and acetyl-CoA

This functional category includes several metabolic pathways that directly or indirectly converge on increased acetyl-CoA production, which is the central intermediate during the metabolism of non-fermentable carbon sources and is a building block of biological membranes (44). It was speculated that developmental regulation of genes in this category supplies acetyl-CoA for cell membrane assembly during rapid cell expansion in the growing fruiting body (28). Of the 20 DEGs in this category, five were downregulated in the Δsnb1. These changes in gene expression are predicted to primarily affect oxaloacetate catabolism. Oxaloacetate, which produces oxalate and acetate from oxaloacetate, is significantly downregulated (ID: 499734, FCwt/Δsnb1: 3.20), perhaps leading to a reduction in acetate and oxalate levels. The upregulation of oxalyl-CoA synthase (ID: 474928, FCΔsnb1/wt: 4.30) may further contribute to the reduction of oxalate levels. Conversely, oxalate decarboxylase (ID: 361522, FCwt/Δsnb1: 4.58), which converts oxalate to formate and CO2, showed significant downregulation, as did carbonic anhydrase (ID: 450047, FCwt/Δsnb1: 2.49), an enzyme that catalyzes the hydration of CO2 into bicarbonate and H+ (45). These changes may alter oxalate production and intracellular pH homeostasis in the mutant.

Although we cannot definitively predict metabolite changes based on the expression dynamics of these genes alone, we hypothesize that the oxalate pathway and oxaloacetate synthesis are impaired in the mutant. Oxalic acid is a very common organic acid secreted by fungi (46) but its exact role remains unclear. Studies on wood decay have shown that oxalate can serve as a source of protons for the enzymatic and non-enzymatic hydrolysis of wood carbohydrates (47). In addition, oxalate can bind non-covalently to β-glucan and form a hydrogel in the extracellular matrix, which can influence the secretion of metabolites (48), which raises the possibility that these transcriptome changes influence cell wall functioning. Oxaloacetate is a precursor molecule of acetyl-CoA and other metabolites that are important for the biosynthesis of various compounds such as ergosterol and membrane lipids, which are essential for cell expansion. Therefore, the expression changes of genes related to basic metabolic systems may influence growth and cell wall dynamics in Δsnb1.

Cell wall biosynthesis and modification

Cell wall biosynthesis and remodeling are probably among the most important processes in the development of fruiting bodies (7, 26). The fungal cell wall consists mainly of chitin, β−1,3-glucan and α−1,3-glucan, and other polysaccharides (49). In line with this, GO terms related to the fungal cell wall and chitin binding were enriched among downregulated DEGs (Fig. S5). We detected a total of 17 conserved DEGs in this category, which mainly comprise chitin and glucan remodeling genes. Generally, genes encoding chitin remodeling enzymes were downregulated, whereas those that code for chitin synthases and glucanases were upregulated in Δsnb1. Out of nine chitin remodeling genes, four were downregulated (FCwt/Δsnb1: 2.76 to 2.11), all of which contain an active site of glycosyl hydrolase family 18. These include the endochitinase ChiEn3 (ID: 470416, FCwt/Δsnb1: 2.60), which was suggested to be involved in stipe cell wall modification (10). Downregulated genes included ID: 464952 and ID: 440521, which encode chitin deacetylases, a protein family that was previously reported to be involved in stipe development and elongation (11). Genes (ID: 372414, ID: 356467), encoding enzymes involved in chitin synthesis, were upregulated. Two genes with glycoside hydrolase 20 annotation (ID: 464567 and ID: 446427) were upregulated in the mutant; however, the function of these in development is currently unclear (28).

On the other hand, the three DEGs predicted to be involved in glucan remodeling were upregulated. These include a GH5 beta-glucanase, a GH3 member, and a member of the GH128 endoglucanase family. The latter has been first described in the fruiting bodies of L. edodes (50). Furthermore, two genes encoding enzymes with polysaccharide lyase domains were downregulated (ID: 494762 and ID: 543210, FCwt/Δsnb1: 2.27 and 5.91, respectively). Our knowledge of fungal lyases in relation to fungal development is limited, but they may have an impact by altering cell wall polysaccharides (26).

Taken together, the presence of chitinases and other enzymes that modify cell wall polysaccharide components suggests that processes related to cell wall synthesis and remodeling are affected in the mutant strain. The altered expression patterns of these genes could contribute to the spherical growth of Δsnb1 fruiting bodies.

Cell surface and cell wall protein-encoding genes

Several cell wall-associated gene groups, like lectins, hydrophobins, and cerato-platanins exhibited high expression differences in the Δsnb1 mutant. We identified four DEGs in this functional group, however, because such genes evolve fast and did not form conserved orthogroups in the study that defined these categories (28), we decided to analyze all DEG genes in C. cinerea that are related to the cell surface.

Lectins are a highly variable group of genes, many of them encode secreted cell surface proteins that are known for their specific recognition and binding of various carbohydrate moieties, which makes them versatile in multiple biological roles, such as defense (51, 52). By combining MycoLec (53) and InterPro searches, we found a total of 95 lectins in the genome of C. cinerea, with 20 of these being DEG in the ∆snb1 strain. Expression of ricin-B-like (beta-trefoil) lectins ccl1 (ID: 456849) and ccl2 (ID: 408852) increase more than 150-fold during primordium development in wt C. cinerea (52) but their expression levels in the Δsnb1 strain did not show such an increase (FCwt/Δsnb1: 6.15 and −5.69, respectively). Similarly, two galectins, cgl1 (ID: 473274) and cgl2 (ID: 488611) were downregulated in Δsnb1 (FCwt/Δsnb1: 4.69 and 2.94, respectively). Both galectins are involved in fruiting body formation: while cgl2 is primarily expressed in hyphal knots, cgl1 is expressed during fruiting body formation (54). A ricin-B lectin (ID: 442572) showed the highest upregulation in Δsnb1 (FCΔsnb1/wt: 11.9). Numerous lectins show dynamic expression during fruiting body development (52, 55) and, as shown by this study, are altered in the Δsnb1 strain. This underscores their role in sculpting fruiting bodies; however, whether they are part of the defensive arsenal or contribute in other ways remains to be established for each specific gene.

Hydrophobins can spontaneously assemble into an amphipathic monolayer to form a hydrophobic surface. Differentially expressed hydrophobins are highly enriched; of the 34 C. cinerea hydrophobins, 19 were DEGs in Δsnb1 fruiting bodies, of which 11 were downregulated in the mutant. Among the downregulated DEG hydrophobins 8 were “FB-init” in the data set of Krizsán et al. (26). Hydrophobin up- or downregulation could indicate the lack of hydrophobic cell surface coating of mutant cells or, if the given hydrophobin gene is strongly tissue-specifically expressed, could also stem from the lack of certain tissues in the mutant strain.

Cerato-platanins are small, secreted, cysteine-rich proteins associated with the fungal cell wall (56). They were first described in the context of plant pathogenicity (57), however, based on their expression dynamics they are likely also associated with development (26, 28). Three C. cinerea cerato-platanin genes showed significant downregulation in ∆snb1. Structurally, cerato-platanins show a double-Ψ-β-barrel (DPBB) topology of the RlpA superfamily, an architecture that is also typical to further proteins, like expansins (58, 59), certain endoglucanases (60), and virulence factors of plant pathogens (61, 62). An additional interesting example with this domain structure is the DEG ID: 421450, showing the highest upregulation (FCΔsnb1/wt: 21.86) in the ∆snb1 strain. The expression of this gene is generally very low during fruiting body development and encodes a secreted protein without further functional information (26). Cerato-platanins share structural and functional similarities with expansins, suggesting that some of them are involved in different stages of fungal growth and development and are possibly linked to the cell wall (26, 28, 63). This hypothesis is supported by previous studies on DPBB-containing effectors, which showed chitin-binding ability and suppression of chitin-triggered immunity (64).

Another group of DEGs worth highlighting encodes secreted proteins with a domain of unknown function 4360 (DUF4360). Five DUF4360-containing DEGs showed a remarkable upregulation in Δsnb1 (e.g., ID: 116193, FCΔsnb1/wt: 18.9), while one of them was downregulated (ID: 464561; FCwt/Δsnb1: 6.98). These proteins have been described in certain plant pathogenic fungi as putative effectors (65). The literature on DUF4360-containing proteins in basidiomycetes is limited but one study reported mycorrhiza-induced small secreted proteins with DUF4360 in the ectomycorrhizae of Hebeloma cylindrosporum (66). The ortholog of this gene in C. cinerea (ID: 545612, FCΔsnb1/wt: 17.69) was highly upregulated in Δsnb1.

A secreted protein-encoding gene, PriA (ID: 419688) is downregulated (FCwt/Δsnb1: 8.22) in the Δsnb1 strain. PriA has been studied in L. edodes with regard to fruiting body initiation and it might have a role in zinc homeostasis (32, 67). This gene is highly induced in primordia and young fruiting bodies of numerous basidiomycetes (26, 68, 69), and its downregulation in the mutant further underscores its importance.

Secondary metabolism and natural product biosynthesis

The basidiomycete secondary metabolome is remarkably different in biogenetic origin and structure from the metabolites from ascomycetes (70). It includes polyketides, terpene, and amino acid derivatives from central metabolic pathways and primary metabolite pools (71, 72). Within this category, all DEGs belonged to the “FB-init” category (26), two being downregulated and two upregulated in the Δsnb1 strain. Two sesquiterpene-producing enzymes showed differential expression: Cop2 (ID: 443805, FCwt/Δsnb1: 7.64) was downregulated, while Cop4 (ID: 30510, FCΔsnb1/wt: 3.53) was upregulated (73). In addition, a phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (ID: 386671, FCwt/Δsnb1: 2.46) was downregulated, while a putative polyketide synthase (ID: 446258, FCΔsnb1/wt: 6.61) was strongly upregulated in the Δsnb1. Terpene synthases are highly overrepresented in the genomes of Agaricomycetes compared to other fungi (26, 74) and may be involved in important functions of the fruiting body. The role of terpene synthases in fruiting is already well known in ascomycetes. For example, polyketide synthase genes in ascomycetes are essential for sexual development and fruiting body morphology. Their absence leads to immature fruiting bodies, while overexpression causes enlarged and malformed ones (75). The role of secondary metabolism in Basidiomycetes is less explored; nevertheless, the observed differential expression patterns in the mutant strain suggest that secondary metabolites may indeed play a role in this process.

Transcriptional regulators

This category includes some of the most important genes that orchestrate the sequence of events in the developmental process, including genes related to chromatin regulation, RNA interference, those encoding RNA-binding proteins, and transcription factors (TFs) (16, 76). Of these, several TFs were significantly differently expressed in the ∆snb1 strain. Of the 47 conserved TFs in this functional category, eight were downregulated and five were upregulated. Five downregulated TFs were developmentally regulated during early developmental events [“FB-init” (26)]. The most downregulated TF is the ortholog of fst1 (ID: 437393, FCwt/Δsnb1: 7.35) of S. commune, the deletion of which leads to arrested fruiting body development (18). The HMG-box containing exp1 (ID: 421729) was upregulated in Δsnb1 fruiting bodies (FCΔsnb1/wt: 3.26). Exp1 was suggested to be required for pileus expansion and autolysis of C. cinerea, controlling the final phase of fruiting-bodyhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/morphogenesismorphogenesis (77). Three out of five members of the transcriptional regulatory Velvet-complex (IDs: 355684, 374867, 496341; FCΔsnb1/wt: 2.09–3.73) showed upregulation in the mutant. Velvet-complex genes are known to be upregulated in the early stages of fruiting body development in several basidiomycetes, suggesting a possible role in their sexual development (25).

The ortholog of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe RNA-binding protein mei2 (ID: 193545, FCwt/Δsnb1: 3.96) is downregulated in the mutant. Mei2 is a conserved regulator of meiosis that protects meiosis-specific transcripts from degradation (25). Similar to other meiosis-related genes typically upregulated in cap structures (68), mei2 showed increased expression in primordia and young fruiting bodies in several basidiomycetes (25).

On the other hand, of the 48 chromatin-related genes within this category, we identified only two downregulated DEGs in the Δsnb1, both encoding methyltransferases. Ich1 (ID: 545797, FCwt/Δsnb1: 13.34) (17) and ID: 501966, FCwt/Δsnb1: 4.84) (15), both putatively involved in chromatin regulation. Ich1 mutation in C. cinerea resulted in poorly differentiated fruiting bodies, resembling snb1 mutants (17).

Transporters

Conserved transporter-encoding genes were strongly enriched among ∆snb1 DEGs, which was also evident from the GO enrichment analysis (Fig. S3). Of the 15 DEG transporters, 10 were downregulated in the mutant. Four downregulated conserved DEGs belong to the Major Facilitator Superfamily (MFS), with ID: 371400 being the most downregulated (FCwt/Δsnb1: 10.16). MFS is one of the largest transporter families, with diverse functions (78). A zinc-regulated transceptor (ID: 455616, FCwt/Δsnb1: 3.32) and a urea/ammonium transporter (ID: 538158, FCwt/Δsnb1: 3.91) were also downregulated in the mutant. These transporters may fulfill functions in fruiting bodies by facilitating the movement of various types of substances, including ions, signaling molecules, osmolytes, and nutrients. However, due to their rapid evolution and the lack of more precise functional data, it is difficult to infer their functions with more specificity.

Functionally poorly known genes

This category mainly includes genes with predicted functions that cannot be easily interpreted (28). We detected 43 DEGs in this category, of which 18 are downregulated and 25 are upregulated. Among the most downregulated DEGs, we found a gene encoding nitronate monooxygenase (ID: 110021, FCwt/Δsnb1: 11.75), which has been described mainly in pathogenic ascomycetes, where it catalyzes the denitrification of nitroalkanes associated with nitro-oxidative stress (79). In addition, two cytochrome P450 encoding genes (ID: 456826 and ID: 24490; FCwt/Δsnb1: 9.47 and FCwt/Δsnb1: 4.54, respectively) were also downregulated in the ∆snb1. These enzymes are involved in the oxidative, peroxidative, and reductive metabolism of various compounds. Deletion of another cytochrome P450 gene, eln2 in C. cinerea resulted in the formation of mature fruiting bodies with short stipes (80), suggesting that other cytochrome P450 enzymes may also contribute to cell morphogenesis and tissue organization.

Genes related to reactive oxygen species (ROS)

ROS generated either externally or as a result of normal metabolism can be harmful to various cellular components; therefore, to balance the flux and redox reactions within cells, fungi employ complex stress response pathways (81). Genes encoding enzymes that protect against ROS, are differentially regulated in the Δsnb1 strain. Within this functional category, thioredoxin genes (ID: 412620 and 39451, FCwt/Δsnb1: 5.25 and 2.42) are downregulated, while a catalase (ID: 472224, FCΔsnb1/wt: 3.13) is upregulated. In Aspergillus nidulans, the deletion of its thioredoxin gene led to increased catalase activity, and the mutant strain showed decreased growth and inability to differentiate reproductive structures (82). Antioxidant-producing enzymes showing upregulation in the Δsnb1 strain included Egt1, ergothionine biosynthesis protein 1 (ID: 356399, FCΔsnb1/wt: 2.57) and Alo1, a D-arabinono-1,4-lactone oxidase (ID: 432313, FCΔsnb1/wt: 4.61). Further related, non-conserved genes, involved in defense against oxidative damage showed upregulation in the mutant, like a superoxide-dismutase (ID: 420887, FCΔsnb1/wt: 3.10) and six out of the seven differentially expressed glutathione-S-transferase genes (FCΔsnb1/wt: 2.08–3.92). In eukaryotic microorganisms, ROS are generally considered as detrimental by-products of aerobic metabolism, however, increasing evidence suggests that their presence in specific concentrations contributes to important physiological roles and triggers cell differentiation in response to oxidative stress (8385). ROS generated by NADPH oxidases (NOX) can be involved in signaling processes driving cellular differentiation (86). However, in our data, the expression of NOX genes was not found to be altered in the mutants. Nevertheless, the elevated expression level of ROS scavenging enzyme encoding genes in the Δsnb1 may lead to a shift in the cellular oxidative environment, which could indirectly play a role in the arrest of differentiation observed in the Δsnb1 strain.

Protease inhibitors

Fungal protease inhibitors are important regulators of proteases; therefore, they play essential physiological roles in fungal cells, such as resource recycling and defense (87). Cap-specific serine protease inhibitors belonging to the MEROPS family I66 are known as mycospins, which, in C. cinerea, have been named cospins (52). In Δsnb1, two paralogous cospins were downregulated (ID: 497809 and ID: 367957, FCwt/Δsnb1: 6.73 and 3.69, respectively). Both were reported to be upregulated during fruiting body initiation (“FB-init”) and enriched in the cap tissue (25, 26). Cospins were initially characterized as having a defensive function against predators and parasites (88). However, it is possible that they serve a dual biological purpose by also controlling the activity of internal serine proteases that play a role in the development of fruiting bodies (87).

Isoprenylcysteine O-methyltransferases

One of the strongest signals in the GO analysis of downregulated genes (Fig. S5) was related to two isoprenylcysteine O-methyltransferase encoding genes (ID: 354499, ID: 445523, FCwt/Δsnb1: 6.27 and 9.71, respectively). These are responsible for carboxyl methylation of proteins that terminate with a CaaX motif, such as mating pheromones and small GTPases (89, 90), which are downregulated in the mutant. We speculate these could be involved in posttranslational cleavage of pheromone precursors or other developmentally relevant polypeptides.

Wax synthases

Wax synthases are involved in the production of wax esters in plants, which form a hydrophobic cuticle layer that serves as a protective barrier against biotic and abiotic stresses (91), and may play a similar role in fungi. Of the eight C. cinerea wax synthase genes, three were significantly downregulated in the Δsnb1 mutant [as an example: ID: 478454 with the largest difference (FCwt/Δsnb1: 6.49) in expression].

Taken together, the RNA-Seq data presented here for two developmental stages of wt and ∆snb1 strains suggest that the lack of developmental patterning that results from the disruption of snb1 affects numerous molecular pathways and SNB1 might have a central role in fruiting body development. Our analyses of the gene expression data highlighted an enrichment of genes that, in previous studies, were shown to be upregulated during early development, when cell differentiation takes place. This is underscored by the preponderance of tissue specifically expressed genes among ∆snb1 DEGs, indicating that, in line with the ∆snb1 phenotype, our RNA-Seq analysis has probably successfully captured genes involved in the differentiation of fruiting body cells. We envision these genes can form the basis of further studies of cellular differentiation in C. cinerea, one of the key features of complex multicellularity. In the future, further reverse genetics studies, especially of regulatory genes, could test the functions of these genes to provide further resolution on the genetic circuits that orchestrate differentiation in mushroom fruiting bodies.

DISCUSSION

In this paper, we characterized snb1 of C. cinerea, a member of a novel, conserved gene family that influences development and cell differentiation in fruiting bodies of Agaricomycetes. We identified snb1 in previous developmental transcriptomic data (26, 28), based on the conservation of its upregulation upon the initiation of fruiting body development. snb1 encodes a protein with a domain of unknown function, which, in conjunction with its expression patterns, made it an exciting candidate for functional characterization. In C. cinerea, the deletion of the snb1 gene resulted in globose, snowball-like fruiting bodies that failed to properly differentiate cap and stipe tissues and remained stunted (Fig. 1).

To characterize snb1 using reverse genetics, we applied an RNP-complex-based CRISPR/Cas9 system (34), and obtained three independent mutants, displaying the same phenotype. While we could not observe any significant changes in the growth of vegetative mycelia, the development of the fruiting bodies showed severe deficiencies, reminiscent of snowballs, which were unable to form a fully structured cap, stipe, or gills, resulting in a lack of sporulation. Although rudimentary cap-like structures emerged later, these did not develop further into recognizable cap initials. To the best of our knowledge, similar phenotypes have not been identified before in C. cinerea or other agaricomycetes. The ichijiku mutant, which is caused by a point mutation in the putative chromatin remodeling gene ich1 (17) exhibits some similarity, as both mutants fail to develop a differentiated pileus at the apex of the primordial shaft and a dark stipe. However, in the snb1 mutant, the rudimentary veil appears at later stages (4 days post-induction), and the primordia remain spherical, whereas the ichijiku mutants elongate vertically. Together, phenotypic data indicate that snb1 may be involved in the differentiation of C. cinerea fruiting bodies and based on the conservation of its expression patterns, probably in that of other agaricomycetes too.

Phylogenetic analyses identified orthologs and homologs of snb1 across the Agaricomycetes, indicating broad conservation among fruiting body-forming basidiomycetes (but not in fruiting body-forming ascomycetes). Despite this conservation, the encoded protein does not contain any known conserved domain with a known function. Such proteins are widespread in fungal genomes and often correspond to novel gene families that are yet to be functionally characterized. Unannotated genes in fungal genomes are frequently highly variable in sequence and encode effectors or small secreted proteins. Examples of recently characterized such gene families include mycorrhiza-induced small secreted proteins (92), a short Cryptococcus neoformans peptide related to quorum sensing (93), effector-like Ssp1 from Pleurotus ostreatus (94), or a cell-surface effector complex from Ustilago (95), among others. However, not all genes with unknown function lack conservation. Several of them are conserved, such as the septation-related spc genes (33) or the recently reported pathogenicity-induced small secreted proteins of Armillaria (96). In the context of agaricomycetes’ fruiting bodies, a recent study identified 158 orthogroups of conserved genes without known function that showed developmentally dynamic expression patterns (28). snb1 was one of these, and our results indicate that the conservation of developmental expression was an accurate predictor of a role in fruiting body development. We interpret these results as evidence these conserved genes can be a rich source of developmental genes and potentially novel functionalities in mushroom-forming fungi. More research is needed to uncover their role in fruiting body development and other life-history traits of fungi.

While the phenotype, phylogenetic conservation, and biophysical properties of SNB1 are straightforward, it is much harder to speculate about its mechanistic function in fungal cells. Structural analyses of the polypeptide indicated that SNB1 is probably a cell membrane protein with seven transmembrane helices (Fig. 4A and B). Based on this, it could function as a transporter, channel, or receptor. However, typical transporters and ion channels generally have more transmembrane domains. The 7 transmembrane domain structure is typical for G-protein-coupled receptors, which, however, have a strict classification system, to which SNB1 does not conform. It is possible that SNB1 fulfills one of these, or yet other roles in the cell membrane but clarifying its mechanistic role in development will require more research.

While the exact function of snb1 remains elusive, we were able to take advantage of the lack of proper tissue differentiation in the Δsnb1 strain to obtain insights into the genes underpinning the development of tissue types in C. cinerea. We profiled gene expression in two developmental stages in which differentiation happens and in which snb1 is upregulated in wt C. cinerea and identified 1,299 significantly differentially expressed genes. Downregulated genes were enriched in ones that, in previous wt data expression (26) show a marked upregulation in secondary hyphal knots and stage 1 primordia as well as displayed tissue-specific expression patterns. These included several previously described fruiting-related genes, such as hydrophobins, lectins (ccl1-2, cgl1-2), cell wall synthesis and remodeling genes, transcriptional regulators (exp1 and fst1 transcription factors, ich1-2) and protease-inhibitors involved in defense, among others. We also identified genes that recurrently appear in fruiting body transcriptomes but have not yet been verified to participate in the morphogenetic process. These include several transcription factors which, as regulators, may be involved in orchestrating differentiation processes in the fruiting body but also cerato-platanins, wax synthases, secondary metabolism genes, or those involved in oxalate metabolism. We anticipate that these genes will be worthy targets of further reverse genetics approaches aimed at uncovering key elements and mechanisms of fruiting body development and differentiation.

It has been reported that LiCl inhibits fruiting body development in a concentration-dependent manner, perhaps by acting on GSK-3, a conserved kinase among eukaryotes that controls various biological activities, such as glycogen metabolism (37, 9799). Our study confirmed the inhibitory effect and revealed that, in the presence of LiCl at concentrations that arrested the wt strain at the hyphal knot stage, the Δsnb1 strain was still capable of producing more advanced, elongated structures (Fig. 3). These observations indicate that the Δsnb1 mutant is less sensitive to the inhibitory effect of LiCl, although the mechanistic details of this difference in sensitivity are not known currently. If LiCl indeed acts by inhibiting glycogen metabolism (GSK-3), then these data might indicate that glycogen metabolism is less active, or less required for the growth and developmental progression of Δsnb1 fruiting bodies. However, clarifying this will require further research.

In summary, this study reported a novel gene family in Agaricomycetes and demonstrated in C. cinerea that one of its members, snb1 is involved in fruiting body development. These data add to our knowledge of development-related genes in mushroom-forming fungi. snb1 is a gene that encodes a protein with no known functional domains. This offered few clues as to how SNB1 might mechanistically influence development. Nevertheless, such genes and the encoded proteins might be involved in novel pathways, or unknown subcellular structures, which are worth examining in more detail, for example by mapping genetic and physical interactions in the cells. Eventually, characterizing a more complete array of functionally poorly known genes will allow us to uncover the molecular complexity of the genetic program that governs fruiting body development, one of the most complex developmental events in fungi.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bioinformatic analyses of snb1

We used the JGI ProteinID accession numbers of the C. cinerea AmutBmut (#326) strain (https://mycocosm.jgi.doe.gov/Copci_AmutBmut1/Copci_AmutBmut1.home.html). In addition, Table S2 also includes the compiled ProteinID accession numbers of the Okayama 7 (#130) strain.

Phylogenetic analysis of SNB1

To assess SNB1 conservation, we used a previously published data set and species tree containing 109 species mainly from Agaricomycotina (22). An OrthoFinder2 (100) clustering was applied to all protein-coding genes of these 109 species with the default parameters but a fixed species tree topology. We manually checked species in which Orthofinder did not find orthologs, using reciprocal best BLAST hits. In the species (Sissu1) Sistotremastrum suecicum (Sissni1), Sistotremastrum niveocremeum, and (Sclci1) Scleroderma citrinum, we found SNB1 homologs using BLAST, independently from the abovementioned clustering analysis. Multiple sequence alignment on the cluster containing SNB1 was inferred using the algorithm MAFFT v6.864b L-INSI-I (101) and trimmed using TrimAL v.1.2 (-gt 0.2) (102). Maximum likelihood gene tree inference (ML) was performed using the LG + G model of sequence evolution and branch robustness was assessed using 1,000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates and the SH-aLRT support measure in IQ-TREE v1.6.12 (103). Rooting and gene tree/species tree reconciliation were performed with NOTUNG v2.9 (104) using an edge weight threshold of 80. Finally, COMPARE (105, 106) https://github.com/zsmerenyi/compaRe) was used to identify and visualize orthogroups within the gene tree and to assess the duplication and loss history of the cluster.

Functional annotations

Conserved domains in proteins were detected using InterProScan-5.61–93.0 (107). Enrichment analysis on GO categories was carried out using the R package topGO 2.44.0 (108). WoLFPSORT (109) was used to predict subcellular localization. DeepTMHMM [version: 1.0.24; (110)] was used to determine the number and orientation of transmembrane helices and AlphaFold [(111, 112); version 2022–11-01] was used to predict tertiary structure.

Strains and culture media

The p-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) auxotrophic homokaryotic C. cinerea AmutBmut1 pab1-1 #326 strain was cultured and maintained in a YMG medium. The composition of media and buffers used in the transformation (YMG, minimal medium, regeneration medium, top agar MM- and MMC buffers, and PEG/CaCl2 solution) followed the description of Dörnte and Kües (2012) (113). To obtain oidia, C. cinerea was cultured on YMG at 37°C under continuous light for 6 days. The mutant C. cinerea strains with complemented pab1 gene were kept in a minimal medium (MM) without PABA.

All the shown phenotypes and the further experiments, including the gene complementation and sampling for RNA-Seq analysis were performed on the same strains (wt and ∆snb1/II. strain).

Design of sgRNAs and RNP-complex assembly

We designed sgRNA using the software sgRNAcas9 (114) using the exon sequences of the snb1 gene (protein ID: 493979). The reference genome (ID: GeneModels_FrozenGeneCatalog_20160912.fasta) was downloaded from the JGI database (115). The protospacer and PAM sequence were (N)20-NGG, and the number of mismatches of the protospacer was minimized when mapping to the whole reference genome of C. cinerea. The selected sgRNA (AUGCCGUGGUACUCUGGGAU) had minimal predicted off-target effects in the C. cinerea genome, and its predicted Cas9 cleavage site was located on 17 bp in exon 7. The trans-activating CRISPR RNA (tracrRNA) and crRNA were commercially synthesized (IDT, USA) for the in vitro-assembled RNP complexes. The in vitro-assembled RNP complexes were obtained by mixing 1.2 µL each of 20 µM crRNA and tracrRNA with 9.6 µL duplex buffer (IDT, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The mixture was incubated at 95°C for 5 minutes and cooled to room temperature for 5 minutes. Next, 0.5 µL duplex buffer, 1.5 µL Cas9 working buffer [based on Liang et al., 2018(116)], and 1 µg TrueCut HiFi Cas9 enzyme (Invitrogen, A50575) were added to the mixture, and the reaction was incubated at 37°C for 15 minutes. The assembled RNP-complex was stored on ice until use. Then, 15 µL of RNP mix was used in protoplast transformation.

Repair template preparation

To obtain the linear repair template, we constructed the KO_493979_pab1_pUC19 plasmid, in which the backbone was a pUC19 vector and consisted of the positive selection marker gene pab1 surrounded by 1000 bp long homologous arms (113), which were amplified with overlapping Gibson primers starting 10 bp away from the expected Cas9 cleavage site. The positive selection marker gene pab1 with its own promoter and terminator region was amplified from the pMA412 vector (117) and flanked by the upstream and downstream homologous arms. Amplicons were purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagene) and the KO_493979_pab1_pUC19 plasmid was constructed using an enhanced Gibson Assembly Mix following the protocol of Rabe and Cepko (2020) (118). The repair template was amplified with primers of pUC19_checking_fwd and β-tubT_(pUC19)_rev. All fragments used in the vector construction and the homologous repair template were amplified using Phusion Plus High-Fidelity Polymerase (Thermo Scientific), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The primers used in this study are listed in Table S1.

Protoplast generation from C. cinerea mycelia

C. cinerea was precultured on YMG at 37°C and under light for 6 days to produce oidia. Oidia were harvested by gently brushing the surface of the culture after adding 5 mL of distilled water. The oidium suspension was inoculated into 50 mL of YMG and incubated overnight at 37°C with shaking at 120 rpm. Germinated oidia were collected and centrifuged at 2,600 × g for 5 minutes. The supernatant was discarded and mycelia were resuspended in 40 mL of sterile MM buffer containing 2% VinoTaste Pro digestive enzyme mix (Novozymes) and gently shaken (100 rpm) at 37°C for 3–4 hours. The digestion process was stopped by adding CaCl2 at a final concentration of 25 mM. Protoplasts were filtered using a 40 µm pore size cell strainer (VWR) and the filtrate was centrifuged at 640 × g for 10 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was discarded and the protoplasts were washed by careful resuspension in 5 mL MMC buffer and collected as described above. The protoplasts were carefully resuspended in 100 µL MMC buffer per transformation and kept on ice until use.

Transformation of C. cinerea

Protoplasts were transformed with a DNA repair template and RNP-complex using a modified PEG/CaCl2-mediated transformation protocol as described by Dörnte and Kües (2012) (113). The transformation mixture contained 25 µL PEG/CaCl2 solution, approximately 1 µg DNA repair template, and 15 µL RNP complex for each 100 µl (~ 106–107) protoplast suspension. To increase the permeability of the cell membrane and facilitate the entry of the RNP complex into the protoplasts, the surfactant Triton X-100 was added to the protoplast suspension at a final concentration of 0.006% (119). The transformation mixture was incubated on ice for 30 minutes. Then a heat shock step was performed by adding 500 µL PEG/CaCl2 to the transformation mixture and incubating it at room temperature for 10 minutes. The transformed protoplasts were carefully suspended in a 5 ml MM buffer and then mixed with 35 mL top agar (40°C) before 10–10 mL of the mixture was layered onto four bottom agar plates containing regeneration medium without PABA. The regeneration plates were incubated at 37°C and the first colonies appeared after 3–4 days. The colonies were then transferred to MM agar plates without PABA for further analysis.

For complementation experiments, we transformed the protoplasted Δsnb1 oidia with a complementation vector, which consisted of the snb1 gene with its 1,000 bp homologous arms and a hygromycin resistance cassette. The transformed cells were spread onto plates with 25 mL regeneration bottom agar without PABA and hygromycin B and kept at 28°C overnight. Then, 5 mL 600 µg/mL hygromycin B containing top agar was layered on each plate. After incubation for several days at 37°C, the colonies were transferred to MM agar plates without PABA and hygromycin.

Fungal colony PCR

To confirm gene disruption, a microwave-assisted colony PCR technique was used (120), in which a pinhead-sized mycelium sample was transferred to 100 µL sterile distilled water, then microwaved at 700 W for 1 minute, briefly vortexed and microwaved again at 700 W for 1 minute, and then stored at −20°C for at least 10 minutes. Prior to PCR, the thawed samples were centrifuged to pellet mycelia and the supernatant was used as a template for colony PCR using Phire Green Master Mix (Thermo Scientific) and checking primers, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

The checking primers were designed to be 100 bp away from the end of the homologous arms; hence, the expected amplicon size of the mutants was longer than that of the wt colonies due to the incorporation of the pab1 selection marker gene or the whole linear repair template into the RNP complex-mediated cleavage site. The used primers are listed in Table S1.

To isolate pure strains from the obtained transformants, we initially cultured them in YMG medium under constant light at 37°C for 5 days. We then harvested the oidia from the mycelial surface using a 0.01% Tween-20 solution. Then, the oidium suspension was diluted and inoculated onto minimal media to separate all the strains.

Synchronized induction of fruiting

To obtain fruiting bodies from the same developmental stages, we followed a previously described method (24). Briefly, C. cinerea strains (d = 5 mm mycelial plugs) were inoculated in the center of YMG agar plates with half glucose content (0.2% wt/vol) and incubated for 6.5 days at 28°C in the dark. Once the agar plate was almost completely colonized by mycelium, we initiated fruiting body development by exposing the colony to white light for 2 h, then placing it back in the dark for 24 h. This was followed by a 12-h light/12-h dark period at 28°C.

Lithium-chloride treatment

To investigate the effect of LiCl on fruiting body development, YMG with half glucose content was adjusted to different LiCl concentrations (0 g/L, 0.5 g/L, 1 g/L, 1.5 g/L, 2 g/L). The strains were cultured, and fruiting was induced synchronously as described above. Five replicates were used for each LiCl concentration and strain.

Mycelial growth rate determination on complete and C- or N-deprived media

To determine the mycelial growth rate on agar plates, we used complete YMG, complete synthetic Fries media (35), and Fries medium without carbon or nitrogen sources. To induce carbon- or nitrogen-starvation, glucose or ammonia-tartrate and asparagine were omitted from the Fries medium, respectively. All the Fries media were supplemented with PABA. Mycelial growth was monitored daily by marking the boundaries of the colonies on the bottom of the plates following inoculation with a 5 mm diameter plug of C. cinerea, which was previously grown on a minimal medium at 28°C for 6 days in the dark. A total of six replicates were examined for each experimental condition. Mycelial growth was monitored by measuring the colony diameter. For statistical analysis of the differences between mutant and wt strains’ mycelial growth rate means on different media we used a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) implemented in the software JASP (version 0.17.1) (121).

Mycelial weight measurement

Wet and lyophilized dry mycelial weights of the three independent snb1 knock-out mutant strains and the wt were determined after growing on sterile cellophane layered on complete YMG agar plate (d = 5 mm mycelium) at 28°C for 6 days in the dark. For statistical analysis of the differences between mutant and wt strains’ mycelial weight means, we used one-way ANOVA implemented in the software JASP (version 0.17.1) (121).

Sampling and sample preparation for RNA-Seq and data evaluation

To perform the RNA-Seq analysis, we obtained secondary hyphal knots and stage 1 primordia from synchronized colonies. Fungal samples were collected at 24 h and 48 h pLI. Samples were fixed with Farmer’s solution (75% absolute ethanol and 25% glacial acetic acid) with 1% 2-mercaptoethanol. 10 mL of Farmer’s solution was applied per colony followed by a 30-minute infiltration using a vacuum pump. Secondary hyphal knots and primordia were collected individually. Three biological replicates of each sample type were stored at –80°C until RNA extraction. Before RNA extraction, samples were washed three times with 1 mL of diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated distilled water and then homogenized with micropestles in liquid nitrogen, and total RNA was extracted by using the Quick-RNA Mini-Prep Kit (Zymo Research) following the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA integrity was determined via gel electrophoresis and the concentration was quantified using Nanodrop. Strand-specific cDNA libraries were constructed from poly(A)-captured RNA using the Illumina TruSeq Stranded RNA-Seq library preparation kit and sequenced on the Illumina Novaseq 6000 (S4) PE150 with (39.7–51.9)/2 million read pairs per sample at Novogene (UK).

Raw reads were analyzed as follows. To remove adaptors, ambiguous nucleotides, and low-quality read end parts, reads were trimmed using bbduk.sh (part of BBMap/BBTools; http://sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/) with the following parameters: trimq = 30, minlen = 50. A two-pass STAR alignment (122) was performed against the reference genome with the same parameters as in our previous study (22) yielding 13.8–18.3 million feature-assigned fragments per sample. Expression values were calculated as fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (FPKM). Differentially expressed genes were identified using cutoff criteria where the log fold-change (LogFC) had to be less than −1 or greater than 1, and the adjusted p-value (Benjamini-Hochberg procedure) had to be less than or equal to 0.05. Genes with FPKM values below five in all samples were excluded from the analysis.

The data set of Krizsán et al. (2019) (26) was reevaluated to identify genes exhibiting tissue-enriched expression, using the R package ‘TissueEnrich’ (123) with the default parameters, except the threshold which was modified to four-fold-change.

The enrichment of functional categories was determined by a one-tailed Fisher’s exact (hypergeometric) test using the phyper() function in R.

Supplementary Material

Reviewer comments
reviewer-comments.pdf (814.5KB, pdf)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was funded by the Momentum Program of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (LP2019-13/2019) and the National Research Development and Innovation Office (Grant No. OTKA 142188). Prepared with the support of the Doctoral Student Scholarship Program of the Co-operative Doctoral Program (KDP-17-4/PALY-2021) of the Ministry of Innovation and Technology financed from the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund.

C.F., L.G.N., and L.G. conceived the study. C.F. generated mutants, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and prepared figures. A.C., H.W., M.V., Z.H., and X.B.L. helped with wet-lab experiments, including CRISPR/Cas9 of C. cinerea. Z.M., C.F., B.B., and B.H. analyzed the bioinformatic data, C.F., L.G.N., L.G., and Z.M. wrote the paper. All authors have read and commented on the manuscript.

Contributor Information

László G. Nagy, Email: lnagy@fungenomelab.com.

Benjamin E. Wolfe, Tufts University, USA

DATA AVAILABILITY

Short-read data associated with the study have been deposited in NCBI archive GEO under the accession number GSE245082.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.01208-23.

Supplemental Figures. msystems.01208-23-s0001.pdf.

Figures S1 to S7 and captions for the supplemental tables.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.01208-23.SuF1
Table S1. msystems.01208-23-s0002.xlsx.

List of primers.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.01208-23.SuF2
Table S2. msystems.01208-23-s0003.xlsx.

Transcriptomic data of differentially expressed genes.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.01208-23.SuF3
Table S3. msystems.01208-23-s0004.xlsx.

GO enrichment analysis.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.01208-23.SuF4
Table S4. msystems.01208-23-s0005.xlsx.

Mapping statistics for Δsnb1 and wild type.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.01208-23.SuF5
OPEN PEER REVIEW. reviewer-comments.pdf.

An accounting of the reviewer comments and feedback.

reviewer-comments.pdf (814.5KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/msystems.01208-23.SuF6

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Nagy LG, Tóth R, Kiss E, Slot J, Gácser A, Kovács GM. 2017. Six key traits of fungi: their evolutionary origins and genetic bases. Microbiol Spectr 5:10–1128. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0036-2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Kües U, Navarro-González M. 2015. How do Agaricomycetes shape their fruiting bodies? 1. morphological aspects of development. Fungal Biol Rev 29:63–97. doi: 10.1016/j.fbr.2015.05.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Hibbett DS. 2007. After the gold rush, or before the flood? evolutionary morphology of mushroom-forming fungi (Agaricomycetes) in the early 21st century. Mycol Res 111:1001–1018. doi: 10.1016/j.mycres.2007.01.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Moore D. 2005. Principles of mushroom developmental biology. Int J Med Mushr 7:79–102. doi: 10.1615/IntJMedMushr.v7.i12.90 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Nagy LG, Kovács GM, Krizsán K. 2018. Complex multicellularity in fungi: evolutionary convergence, single origin, or both. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 93:1778–1794. doi: 10.1111/brv.12418 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Clémençon H, Emmett V. 2004. Cytology and Plectology of the Hymenomycetes. In Bibl Mycol. Vol. 199. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Kües U. 2000. Life history and developmental processes in the basidiomycete Coprinus cinereus. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64:316–353. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.64.2.316-353.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Sunde M, Kwan AHY, Templeton MD, Beever RE, Mackay JP. 2008. Structural analysis of hydrophobins. Micron 39:773–784. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2007.08.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Chen L, Zhang B-B, Cheung PCK. 2012. Comparative proteomic analysis of mushroom cell wall proteins among the different developmental stages of pleurotus tuber-regium. J Agric Food Chem 60:6173–6182. doi: 10.1021/jf301198b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Zhou J, Kang L, Liu C, Niu X, Wang X, Liu H, Zhang W, Liu Z, Latgé J-P, Yuan S, Elliot MA. 2019. Chitinases play a key role in stipe cell wall extension in the mushroom Coprinopsis cinerea. Appl Environ Microbiol 85:00532–19. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00532-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Liu C, Bi J, Kang L, Zhou J, Liu X, Liu Z, Yuan S. 2021. The molecular mechanism of stipe cell wall extension for mushroom stipe elongation growth. Fungal Biol Rev 35:14–26. doi: 10.1016/j.fbr.2020.11.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ohm RA, de Jong JF, de Bekker C, Wösten HAB, Lugones LG. 2011. Transcription factor genes of Schizophyllum commune involved in regulation of mushroom formation. Mol Microbiol 81:1433–1445. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07776.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Pelkmans JF, Patil MB, Gehrmann T, Reinders MJT, Wösten HAB, Lugones LG. 2017. Transcription factors of Schizophyllum commune involved in mushroom formation and modulation of vegetative growth. Sci Rep 7:310. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00483-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Wang W, Wang L, Chen B, Mukhtar I, Xie B, Li Z, Meng L. 2019. Characterization and expression pattern of homeobox transcription factors in fruiting body development of straw mushroom Volvariella volvacea. Fungal Biol 123:95–102. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2018.10.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Liu C, Kang L, Lin M, Bi J, Liu Z, Yuan S, Kronstad JW. 2021. Molecular mechanism by which the GATA transcription factor CcNsdD2 regulates the developmental fate of Coprinopsis cinerea under dark or light conditions. mBio 13:e0362621. doi: 10.1128/mbio.03626-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Sun X, Liu D, Zhao X. 2023. Transcription factors: switches for regulating growth and development in macrofungi. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 107:6179–6191. doi: 10.1007/s00253-023-12726-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Muraguchi H, Kamada T. 1998. The ich1 gene of the mushroom Coprinus cinereus is essential for pileus formation in fruiting. Develop 125:3133–3141. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.16.3133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Vonk PJ, Ohm RA. 2021. H3K4me2 ChIP-Seq reveals the epigenetic landscape during mushroom formation and novel developmental regulators of Schizophyllum commune. Sci Rep 11:8178. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87635-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Szeto CYY, Leung GS, Kwan HS. 2007. Le.MAPK and its interacting partner, Le.DRMIP, in fruiting body development in Lentinula edodes. Gene 393:87–93. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2007.01.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Palmer GE, Horton JS. 2006. Mushrooms by magic: making connections between signal transduction and fruiting body development in the basidiomycete fungus Schizophyllum commune. FEMS Microbiol Lett 262:1–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00341.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Wirth S, Freihorst D, Krause K, Kothe E. 2021. What role might non-mating receptors play in Schizophyllum commune. J Fungi (Basel) 7:399. doi: 10.3390/jof7050399 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Merényi Z, Virágh M, Gluck-Thaler E, Slot JC, Kiss B, Varga T, Geösel A, Hegedüs B, Bálint B, Nagy LG. 2022. Gene age shapes the transcriptional landscape of sexual morphogenesis in mushroom-forming fungi (Agaricomycetes). eLife 11:e71348. doi: 10.7554/eLife.71348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Cheng CK, Au CH, Wilke SK, Stajich JE, Zolan ME, Pukkila PJ, Kwan HS. 2013. 5’-serial analysis of gene expression studies reveal a transcriptomic switch during fruiting body development in Coprinopsis cinerea. BMC Genomics 14:1–17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Muraguchi H, Umezawa K, Niikura M, Yoshida M, Kozaki T, Ishii K, Sakai K, Shimizu M, Nakahori K, Sakamoto Y, Choi C, Ngan CY, Lindquist E, Lipzen A, Tritt A, Haridas S, Barry K, Grigoriev IV, Pukkila PJ. 2015. Strand-specific RNA-seq analyses of fruiting body development in Coprinopsis cinerea. PLoS ONE 10:e0141586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141586 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Plaza DF, Lin C-W, van der Velden NSJ, Aebi M, Künzler M. 2014. Comparative transcriptomics of the model mushroom Coprinopsis cinerea reveals tissue-specific armories and a conserved circuitry for sexual development. BMC Genomics 15:492. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-492 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Krizsán K, Almási É, Merényi Z, Sahu N, Virágh M, Kószó T, Mondo S, Kiss B, Bálint B, Kües U, Barry K, Cseklye J, Hegedüs B, Henrissat B, Johnson J, Lipzen A, Ohm RA, Nagy I, Pangilinan J, Yan J, Xiong Y, Grigoriev IV, Hibbett DS, Nagy LG. 2019. Transcriptomic atlas of mushroom development reveals conserved genes behind complex multicellularity in fungi. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:7409–7418. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1817822116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Nagy LG. 2023. Mushroom functional genomics springs up. Innov Life 1:100005–1. doi: 10.59717/j.xinn-life.2023.100005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Nagy LG, Vonk PJ, Künzler M, Földi C, Virágh M, Ohm RA, Hennicke F, Bálint B, Csernetics Á, Hegedüs B, Hou Z, Liu XB, Nan S, Pareek M, Sahu N, Szathmári B, Varga T, Wu H, Yang X, Merényi Z. 2023. Lessons on fruiting body morphogenesis from genomes and transcriptomes of Agaricomycetes. Stud Mycol 104:1–85. doi: 10.3114/sim.2022.104.01 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Durairaj J, Waterhouse AM, Mets T, Brodiazhenko T, Abdullah M, Studer G, Tauriello G, Akdel M, Andreeva A, Bateman A, Tenson T, Hauryliuk V, Schwede T, Pereira J. 2023. Uncovering new families and folds in the natural protein universe. Nature 622:646–653. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06622-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Labourel A, Frandsen KEH, Zhang F, Brouilly N, Grisel S, Haon M, Ciano L, Ropartz D, Fanuel M, Martin F, Navarro D, Rosso M-N, Tandrup T, Bissaro B, Johansen KS, Zerva A, Walton PH, Henrissat B, Leggio LL, Berrin J-G. 2020. A fungal family of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase-like copper proteins. Nat Chem Biol 16:345–350. doi: 10.1038/s41589-019-0438-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Mat-Sharani S, Firdaus-Raih M. 2019. Computational discovery and annotation of conserved small open reading frames in fungal genomes. BMC Bioinformatics 19:551. doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2550-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Ishizaki T, Shishido K. 2000. Decreased zinc ion accumulation by the basidiomycete Lentinus edodes over-expressing L.edodes priA gene. FEMS Microbiol Lett 193:111–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09411.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. van Peer AF, Wang F, van Driel KGA, de Jong JF, van Donselaar EG, Müller WH, Boekhout T, Lugones LG, Wösten HAB. 2010. The septal pore cap is an organelle that functions in vegetative growth and mushroom formation of the wood-rot fungus Schizophyllum commune. Environ Microbiol 12:833–844. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02122.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Pareek M, Hegedüs B, Hou Z, Csernetics Á, Wu H, Virágh M, Sahu N, Liu X-B, Nagy L. 2022. Preassembled Cas9 ribonucleoprotein-mediated gene deletion identifies the carbon catabolite repressor and its target genes in Coprinopsis cinerea. Appl Environ Microbiol 88:e0094022. doi: 10.1128/aem.00940-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Fries L. 1953. Factors promoting growth of Coprinus fimetarius (L.) under high temperature conditions. Physiol Plant 6:551–563. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1953.tb08413.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Tsusué YM. 1969. Experimental control of fruit‐body formation in Coprinus macrorhizus. Dev Growth Differ 11:164–178. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-169x.1969.00164.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Chang J, Chan PL, Xie Y, Ma KL, Cheung MK, Kwan HS. 2019. Modified recipe to inhibit fruiting body formation for living fungal biomaterial manufacture. PLoS One 14:e0209812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209812 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Paysan-Lafosse T, Blum M, Chuguransky S, Grego T, Pinto BL, Salazar GA, Bileschi ML, Bork P, Bridge A, Colwell L, et al. 2023. Interpro in 2022. Nucleic Acids Res 51:D418–D427. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Ruytinx J, Miyauchi S, Hartmann-Wittulsky S, de Freitas Pereira M, Guinet F, Churin J-L, Put C, Le Tacon F, Veneault-Fourrey C, Martin F, Kohler A. 2021. A transcriptomic atlas of the ectomycorrhizal fungus laccaria bicolor. Microorg 9:2612. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9122612 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Sipos G, Prasanna AN, Walter MC, O’Connor E, Bálint B, Krizsán K, Kiss B, Hess J, Varga T, Slot J, et al. 2017. Genome expansion and lineage-specific genetic innovations in the forest pathogenic fungi Armillaria. Nat Ecol Evol 1:1931–1941. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0347-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Almási É, Sahu N, Krizsán K, Bálint B, Kovács GM, Kiss B, Cseklye J, Drula E, Henrissat B, Nagy I, Chovatia M, Adam C, LaButti K, Lipzen A, Riley R, Grigoriev IV, Nagy LG. 2019. Comparative genomics reveals unique wood‐decay strategies and fruiting body development in the Schizophyllaceae. New Phytol 224:902–915. doi: 10.1111/nph.16032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Gehrmann T, Pelkmans JF, Ohm RA, Vos AM, Sonnenberg ASM, Baars JJP, Wösten HAB, Reinders MJT, Abeel T. 2018. Nucleus-specific expression in the multinuclear mushroom-forming fungus Agaricus bisporus reveals different nuclear regulatory programs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:4429–4434. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1721381115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Ke H-M, Lee H-H, Lin C-YI, Liu Y-C, Lu MR, Hsieh J-WA, Chang C-C, Wu P-H, Lu MJ, Li J-Y, Shang G, Lu RJ-H, Nagy LG, Chen P-Y, Kao H-W, Tsai IJ. 2020. Mycena genomes resolve the evolution of fungal bioluminescence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117:31267–31277. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2010761117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Strijbis K, Distel B. 2010. Intracellular acetyl unit transport in fungal carbon metabolism. Eukaryot Cell 9:1809–1815. doi: 10.1128/EC.00172-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Elleuche S, Pöggeler S. 2010. Carbonic anhydrases in fungi. Microbiology (Reading) 156:23–29. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.032581-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Jarosz-Wilkołazka A, Graz M. 2006. Organic acids production by white rot basidiomycetes in the presence of metallic oxides. Can J Microbiol 52:779–785. doi: 10.1139/w06-032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Shimada M, Akamtsu Y, Tokimatsu T, Mii K, Hattori T. 1997. Possible biochemical roles of oxalic acid as a low molecular weight compound involved in brown-rot and white-rot wood decays. J Biotech 53:103–113. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1656(97)01679-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Perez-Gonzalez G, Tompsett GA, Mastalerz K, Timko MT, Goodell B. 2023. Interaction of oxalate with β-glucan: implications for the fungal extracellular matrix, and metabolite transport. iSci 26:106851. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106851 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Gow NAR, Lenardon MD. 2023. Architecture of the dynamic fungal cell wall. Nat Rev Microbiol 21:248–259. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00796-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Sakamoto Y, Nakade K, Konno N. 2011. Endo-β-1, 3-glucanase GLU1, from the fruiting body of Lentinula edodes, belongs to a new glycoside hydrolase family. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:8350–8354. doi: 10.1128/AEM.05581-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Künzler M. 2015. Hitting the sweet spot: glycans as targets of fungal defense effector proteins. Molcules 20:8144–8167. doi: 10.3390/molecules20058144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Sabotič J, Ohm RA, Künzler M. 2016. Entomotoxic and nematotoxic lectins and protease inhibitors from fungal fruiting bodies. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:91–111. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-7075-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Lebreton A, Bonnardel F, Dai YC, Imberty A, Martin FM, Lisacek F. 2021. A comprehensive phylogenetic and bioinformatics survey of lectins in the fungal kingdom. J Fungi (Basel) 7:453. doi: 10.3390/jof7060453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Boulianne RP, Liu Y, Aebi M, Lu BC, Kües U. 2000. Fruiting body development in Coprinus cinereus: regulated expression of two galectins secreted by a non-classical pathway. Microbiol (Reading) 146:1841–1853. doi: 10.1099/00221287-146-8-1841 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Bleuler-Martínez S, Butschi A, Garbani M, Wälti MA, Wohlschlager T, Potthoff E, Sabotiĉ J, Pohleven J, Lüthy P, Hengartner MO, Aebi M, Künzler M. 2011. A lectin‐mediated resistance of higher fungi against predators and parasites. Mol Ecol 20:3056–3070. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05093.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Luti S, Sella L, Quarantin A, Pazzagli L, Baccelli I. 2020. Twenty years of research on cerato-platanin family proteins: clues, conclusions, and unsolved issues. Fungal Biol Rev 34:13–24. doi: 10.1016/j.fbr.2019.10.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Baccelli I. 2014. Cerato-platanin family proteins: one function for multiple biological roles. Front Plant Sci 5:769. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00769 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. de Oliveira AL, Gallo M, Pazzagli L, Benedetti CE, Cappugi G, Scala A, Pantera B, Spisni A, Pertinhez TA, Cicero DO. 2011. The structure of the elicitor cerato-platanin (CP), the first member of the CP fungal protein family, reveals a double Ψβ-barrel fold and carbohydrate binding. J Biol Chem 286:17560–17568. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.223644 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Narváez-Barragán DA, Tovar-Herrera OE, Segovia L, Serrano M, Martinez-Anaya C. 2020. Expansin-related proteins: biology, microbe–plant interactions and associated plant-defense responses. Microbiol (Reading) 166:1007–1018. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000984 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Hirvonen M, Papageorgiou AC. 2003. Crystal structure of a family 45 endoglucanase from Melanocarpus albomyces: mechanistic implications based on the free and cellobiose-bound forms. J Mol Biol 329:403–410. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00467-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Charova SN, Dölfors F, Holmquist L, Moschou PN, Dixelius C, Tzelepis G. 2020. The RsRlpA effector is a protease inhibitor promoting Rhizoctonia solani virulence through suppression of the hypersensitive response. Int J Mol Sci 21:8070. doi: 10.3390/ijms21218070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Sarkar D, Majumder S, Giri K, Sabnam N. 2023. In silico characterization, molecular docking, and dynamic simulation of a novel fungal cell-death suppressing effector, morlpa as potential cathepsin B-like cysteine protease inhibitor during rice blast infection. J Biomol Struct Dyn 41:9039–9056. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2022.2139763 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Gaderer R, Bonazza K, Seidl-Seiboth V. 2014. Cerato-platanins: a fungal protein family with intriguing properties and application potential. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:4795–4803. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-5690-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Dölfors F, Holmquist L, Dixelius C, Tzelepis G. 2019. A LysM effector protein from the basidiomycete Rhizoctonia solani contributes to virulence through suppression of chitin-triggered immunity. Mol Genet Genomics 294:1211–1218. doi: 10.1007/s00438-019-01573-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Wang D, Tian L, Zhang D-D, Song J, Song S-S, Yin C-M, Zhou L, Liu Y, Wang B-L, Kong Z-Q, Klosterman SJ, Li J-J, Wang J, Li T-G, Adamu S, Subbarao KV, Chen J-Y, Dai X-F. 2020. Functional analyses of small secreted cysteine‐rich proteins identified candidate effectors in Verticillium dahliae. Mol Plant Pathol 21:667–685. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12921 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Doré J, Kohler A, Dubost A, Hundley H, Singan V, Peng Y, Kuo A, Grigoriev IV, Martin F, Marmeisse R, Gay G. 2017. The ectomycorrhizal basidiomycete hebeloma cylindrosporum undergoes early waves of transcriptional reprogramming prior to symbiotic structures differentiation. Environ Microbiol 19:1338–1354. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13670 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Kajiwara S, Yamaoka K, Hori K, Miyazawa H, Saito T, Kanno T, Shishido K. 1992. Isolation and sequence of a developmentally regulated putative novel gene, priA, from the basidiomycete Lentinus edodes. Gene 114:173–178. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(92)90571-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Liu X-B, Xia E-H, Li M, Cui Y-Y, Wang P-M, Zhang J-X, Xie B-G, Xu J-P, Yan J-J, Li J, Nagy LG, Yang ZL. 2020. Transcriptome data reveal conserved patterns of fruiting body development and response to heat stress in the mushroom-forming fungus Flammulina filiformis. PLoS One 15:e0239890. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239890 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Fu Y, Dai Y, Yang C, Wei P, Song B, Yang Y, Sun L, Zhang Z-W, Li Y. 2017. Comparative transcriptome analysis identified candidate genes related to bailinggu mushroom formation and genetic markers for genetic analyses and breeding. Sci Rep 7:9266. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08049-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Schüffler A. 2018. Secondary metabolites of basidiomycetes, p 231–275. In Physiology and Genetics.The Mycota. Vol. 15. [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Keller NP. 2019. Fungal secondary metabolism: regulation, function and drug discovery. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:167–180. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0121-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Gressler M, Löhr NA, Schäfer T, Lawrinowitz S, Seibold PS, Hoffmeister D. 2021. Mind the mushroom: natural product biosynthetic genes and enzymes of Basidiomycota. Nat Prod Rep 38:702–722. doi: 10.1039/d0np00077a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Agger S, Lopez-Gallego F, Schmidt-Dannert C. 2009. Diversity of sesquiterpene synthases in the basidiomycete Coprinus cinereus. Mol Microbiol 72:1181–1195. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06717.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Slot JC, Gluck-Thaler E. 2019. Metabolic gene clusters, fungal diversity, and the generation of accessory functions. Curr Opin Genet Dev 58:17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2019.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Schindler D, Nowrousian M. 2014. The polyketide synthase gene pks4 is essential for sexual development and regulates fruiting body morphology in Sordaria macrospora. Fungal Genet Biol 68:48–59. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2014.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Nowrousian M. 2022. The role of chromatin and transcriptional control in the formation of sexual fruiting bodies in fungi. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 86:e0010422. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.00104-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Muraguchi H, Fujita T, Kishibe Y, Konno K, Ueda N, Nakahori K, Yanagi SO, Kamada T. 2008. The exp1 gene essential for pileus expansion and autolysis of the inky cap mushroom Coprinopsis cinerea (Coprinus cinereus) encodes an HMG protein. Fungal Genet Biol 45:890–896. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2007.11.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Perlin MH, Andrews J, Toh SS. 2014. Essential letters in the fungal alphabet: ABC and MFS transporters and their roles in survival and pathogenicity. Adv Genet 85:201–253. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800271-1.00004-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Nguyen PT, Wacker T, Brown AJP, da Silva Dantas A, Shekhova E. 2022. Understanding the role of nitronate monooxygenases in virulence of the human fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. J Fungi (Basel) 8:736. doi: 10.3390/jof8070736 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Muraguchi H, Kamada T. 2000. A mutation in the eln2 gene encoding a cytochrome P450 of Coprinus cinereus affects mushroom morphogenesis. Fungal Genet Biol 29:49–59. doi: 10.1006/fgbi.2000.1184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Yaakoub H, Mina S, Calenda A, Bouchara J-P, Papon N. 2022. Oxidative stress response pathways in fungi. Cell Mol Life Sci 79:333. doi: 10.1007/s00018-022-04353-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Thön M, Al-Abdallah Q, Hortschansky P, Brakhage AA. 2007. The thioredoxin system of the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans: impact on development and oxidative stress respone. J Biol Chem 282:27259–27269. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M704298200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Aguirre J, Ríos-Momberg M, Hewitt D, Hansberg W. 2005. Reactive oxygen species and development in microbial eukaryotes. Trends Microbiol 13:111–118. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2005.01.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Hansberg W, Aguirre J, Rís-Momberg M, Rangel P, Peraza L, Montes de Oca Y, Cano-Domínguez N. 2008. Chapter 15 cell differentiation as a response to oxidative stress, p 235–257. In Avery SV, Stratford M, van West P (ed), British Mycological Society Symposia series. Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Scott B, Eaton CJ. 2008. Role of reactive oxygen species in fungal cellular differentiations. Curr Opin Microbiol 11:488–493. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2008.10.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Takemoto D, Tanaka A, Scott B. 2007. NADPH oxidases in fungi: diverse roles of reactive oxygen species in fungal cellular differentiation. Fungal Genet Biol 44:1065–1076. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2007.04.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Sabotič J, Kos J. 2016. Fungal protease inhibitors, p 1–33. In Mérillon JM, Ramawat KG (ed), Fungal Metabolites. Springer International Publishing, Cham. [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Sabotič J, Bleuler-Martinez S, Renko M, Avanzo Caglič P, Kallert S, Štrukelj B, Turk D, Aebi M, Kos J, Künzler M. 2012. Structural basis of trypsin inhibition and entomotoxicity of cospin, serine protease inhibitor involved in defense of Coprinopsis cinerea fruiting bodies. J Biol Chem 287:3898–3907. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.285304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Romano JD, Michaelis S. 2001. Topological and mutational analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ste14P, founding member of the isoprenylcysteine carboxyl methyltransferase family. Mol Biol Cell 12:1957–1971. doi: 10.1091/mbc.12.7.1957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Raudaskoski M, Kothe E, Fowler TJ, Jung E-M, Horton JS. 2012. Ras and Rho small G proteins: insights from the schizophyllum commune genome sequence and comparisons to other fungi. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev 28:61–100. doi: 10.5661/bger-28-61 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Li C, Haslam TM, Krüger A, Schneider LM, Mishina K, Samuels L, Yang H, Kunst L, Schaffrath U, Nawrath C, Chen G, Komatsuda T, von Wettstein-Knowles P. 2018. The β-ketoacyl-CoA synthase HvKCS1, encoded by Cer-zh,plays a key role in synthesis of barley leaf wax and germination of barley powdery mildew. Plant Cell Physiol 59:806–822. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcy020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Plett JM, Plett KL. 2022. Leveraging genomics to understand the broader role of fungal small secreted proteins in niche colonization and nutrition. ISME Commun 2:49. doi: 10.1038/s43705-022-00139-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Tian X, He G-J, Hu P, Chen L, Tao C, Cui Y-L, Shen L, Ke W, Xu H, Zhao Y, Xu Q, Bai F, Wu B, Yang E, Lin X, Wang L. 2018. Cryptococcus neoformans sexual reproduction is controlled by a quorum sensing peptide. Nat Microbiol 3:698–707. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0160-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Feldman D, Yarden O, Hadar Y. 2020. Seeking the roles for fungal small-secreted proteins in affecting saprophytic lifestyles. Front Microbiol 11:455. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00455 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Ludwig N, Reissmann S, Schipper K, Gonzalez C, Assmann D, Glatter T, Moretti M, Ma L-S, Rexer K-H, Snetselaar K, Kahmann R. 2021. A cell surface-exposed protein complex with an essential virulence function in Ustilago maydis. Nat Microbiol 6:722–730. doi: 10.1038/s41564-021-00896-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Sahu N, Indic B, Wong-Bajracharya J, Merényi Z, Ke H-M, Ahrendt S, Monk T-L, Kocsubé S, Drula E, Lipzen A, et al. 2023. Vertical and horizontal gene transfer shaped plant colonization and biomass degradation in the fungal genus Armillaria. Nat Microbiol 8:1668–1681. doi: 10.1038/s41564-023-01448-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Noble W, Planel E, Zehr C, Olm V, Meyerson J, Suleman F, Gaynor K, Wang L, LaFrancois J, Feinstein B, Burns M, Krishnamurthy P, Wen Y, Bhat R, Lewis J, Dickson D, Duff K. 2005. Inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3 by lithium correlates with reduced tauopathy and degeneration in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:6990–6995. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0500466102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Forde JE, Dale TC. 2007. Glycogen synthase kinase 3: a key regulator of cellular fate. Cell Mol Life Sci 64:1930–1944. doi: 10.1007/s00018-007-7045-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Song Y, Wang Y, Yu Q, Sun Y, Zhang J, Zhan J, Ren M. 2023. Regulatory network of GSK3-like kinases and their role in plant stress response. Front Plant Sci 14:1123436. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1123436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Emms DM, Kelly S. 2019. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol 20:238. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1832-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30:772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. 2009. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25:1972–1973. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD, von Haeseler A, Lanfear R. 2020. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol 37:1530–1534. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Darby CA, Stolzer M, Ropp PJ, Barker D, Durand D, Chauve C. 2017. Xenolog classification. Bioinform 33:640–649. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw686 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Nagy LG, Ohm RA, Kovács GM, Floudas D, Riley R, Gácser A, Sipiczki M, Davis JM, Doty SL, de Hoog GS, Lang BF, Spatafora JW, Martin FM, Grigoriev IV, Hibbett DS. 2014. Latent homology and convergent regulatory evolution underlies the repeated emergence of yeasts. Nat Commun 5:4471. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5471 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Merényi Z, Krizsán K, Sahu N, Liu X-B, Bálint B, Stajich JE, Spatafora JW, Nagy LG. 2023. Genomes of fungi and relatives reveal delayed loss of ancestral gene families and evolution of key fungal traits. Nat Ecol Evol 7:1221–1231. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02095-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Jones P, Binns D, Chang H-Y, Fraser M, Li W, McAnulla C, McWilliam H, Maslen J, Mitchell A, Nuka G, Pesseat S, Quinn AF, Sangrador-Vegas A, Scheremetjew M, Yong S-Y, Lopez R, Hunter S. 2014. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinform 30:1236–1240. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Alexa A, Rahnenfuhrer J. 2023. topGO: enrichment analysis for gene ontology. Bioconductor. doi: 10.18129/B9.bioc.topGO [DOI]
  • 109. Horton P, Park KJ, Obayashi T, Fujita N, Harada H, Adams-Collier CJ, Nakai K. 2007. WoLF PSORT: protein localization predictor. Nucleic Acids Res 35:W585–7. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Hallgren J, Tsirigos KD, Pedersen MD, Almagro Armenteros JJ, Marcatili P, Nielsen H, Krogh A, Winther O. 2022. DeepTMHMM predicts alpha and beta transmembrane proteins using deep neural networks. Bioinformatics. doi: 10.1101/2022.04.08.487609 [DOI]
  • 111. Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, Tunyasuvunakool K, Bates R, Žídek A, Potapenko A, et al. 2021. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with alphafold. Nature 596:583–589. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Varadi M, Anyango S, Deshpande M, Nair S, Natassia C, Yordanova G, Yuan D, Stroe O, Wood G, Laydon A, et al. 2022. Alphafold protein structure database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucleic Acids Res 50:D439–D444. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Dörnte B, Kües U. 2012. Reliability in transformation of the Basidiomycete Coprinopsis Cinerea. Current trends in biotechnology and Pharmacy 6:340–355. [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Xie S, Shen B, Zhang C, Huang X, Zhang Y. 2014. SgRNAcas9: a software package for designing CRISPR sgRNA and evaluating potential off-target cleavage sites. PLoS One 9:e100448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Grigoriev IV, Nikitin R, Haridas S, Kuo A, Ohm R, Otillar R, Riley R, Salamov A, Zhao X, Korzeniewski F, Smirnova T, Nordberg H, Dubchak I, Shabalov I. 2014. Mycocosm portal: gearing up for 1000 fungal genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D699–704. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Liang Z, Chen K, Zhang Y, Liu J, Yin K, Qiu JL, Gao C. 2018. Genome editing of bread wheat using biolistic delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 in vitro transcripts or ribonucleoproteins. Nat Protoc 13:413–430. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2017.145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Stanley CE, Stöckli M, van Swaay D, Sabotič J, Kallio PT, Künzler M, deMello AJ, Aebi M. 2014. Probing bacterial–fungal interactions at the single cell level. Integr Biol (Camb) 6:935–945. doi: 10.1039/c4ib00154k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Rabe BA, Cepko C. 2020. A simple enhancement for gibson isothermal assembly. Mol Biol. doi: 10.1101/2020.06.14.150979 [DOI]
  • 119. Zou G, Xiao M, Chai S, Zhu Z, Wang Y, Zhou Z. 2021. Efficient genome editing in filamentous fungi via an improved CRISPR‐Cas9 ribonucleoprotein method facilitated by chemical reagents. Microb Biotechnol 14:2343–2355. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13652 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Dörnte B, Kües U. 2013. Fast microwave-based DNA extraction from vegetative mycelium and fruiting body tissues of agaricomycetes for PCR amplification. Curr Trends Biotechnol Pharm 7:825–836. [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Team JASP. 2023. JASP (Version 0.17.1.) computer software. Available from: https://jasp-stats.org
  • 122. Veeneman BA, Shukla S, Dhanasekaran SM, Chinnaiyan AM, Nesvizhskii AI. 2016. Two-pass alignment improves novel splice junction quantification. Bioinform 32:43–49. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv642 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Jain A, Tuteja G. 2019. TissueEnrich: tissue-specific gene enrichment analysis. Bioinform 35:1966–1967. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty890 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Reviewer comments
reviewer-comments.pdf (814.5KB, pdf)
Supplemental Figures. msystems.01208-23-s0001.pdf.

Figures S1 to S7 and captions for the supplemental tables.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.01208-23.SuF1
Table S1. msystems.01208-23-s0002.xlsx.

List of primers.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.01208-23.SuF2
Table S2. msystems.01208-23-s0003.xlsx.

Transcriptomic data of differentially expressed genes.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.01208-23.SuF3
Table S3. msystems.01208-23-s0004.xlsx.

GO enrichment analysis.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.01208-23.SuF4
Table S4. msystems.01208-23-s0005.xlsx.

Mapping statistics for Δsnb1 and wild type.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.01208-23.SuF5
OPEN PEER REVIEW. reviewer-comments.pdf.

An accounting of the reviewer comments and feedback.

reviewer-comments.pdf (814.5KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/msystems.01208-23.SuF6

Data Availability Statement

Short-read data associated with the study have been deposited in NCBI archive GEO under the accession number GSE245082.


Articles from mSystems are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES