Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 7;24:250. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05224-5

Table 2.

Likert Questionnaire

Likert Questionnaire (1 = Disagree, 4 = Agree) – Mean (SD) Final trial (n = 10)
I resected the pseudotumors with an adequate safety margin (10 mm). 3.2 (0.4)
I was able to be precise in this pseudotumor resection. 2.9 (0.3)
I found the time required to practice compatible with the clinical routine. 3.6 (0.5)
By practicing tumor resection using the pseudotumor model, I feel better prepared for tumor resection in a patient. 3.6 (0.5)
I can imagine the pseudotumor model being used in surgical teaching. 3.7 (0.5)
I was able to focus well during pseudotumor resection. 3.8 (0.4)
The scissors were suitable for pseudotumor resection. 3.3 (0.9)
The scalpel was suitable for pseudotumor resection. 3.6 (0.7)
I could clearly palpate where and how many pseudotumors were in a tongue. 3.5 (0.5)
The feel of the pseudotumor was comparable to a real tumor of the tongue. 3.0 (0.5)
I could clearly palpate the pseudotumor margin. 3.2 (0.6)
Based on the CT images, I was able to perform a more precise resection of the pseudotumors. 3.0 (0.9)
The radiological imaging helped me with spatial orientation. 3.3 (0.8)
I could clearly identify the pseudotumors on the CT images. 3.9 (0.3)