Table 6.

Heterogeneity analysis: income level

Income level		Panel A:Dependent variable: consciously controlling sugar intake			Panel B:Dependent variable: consciously controlling salt intake
		Pension	Optimal bandwidth	N	Pension	Optimal bandwidth	N
(1) Household income	Low-income	0.630**	4.156	293;324	0.451*	4.458	293;324
		(0.287)			(0.266)
	Medium-income	0.059	5.734	373;307	0.170	5.717	373;307
		(0.312)			(0.329)
	High-income	0.811	4.499	291;219	0.488	4.990	291;219
		(1.643)			(1.169)
(2) Income satisfaction	Satisfied	0.113	4.336	476;471	0.038	4.284	476;471
		(0.401)			(0.399)
	Commonly	0.622*	5.210	241;205	0.538*	5.175	241;205
		(0.323)			(0.318)
	Dissatisfied	1.026	3.700	136;134	1.198	3.358	136;134
		(0.899)			(1.021)
Income level		Panel C:Dependent variable-Consciously controlling edible oil intake			Panel D:Dependent variable-Learning health knowledge or wellness knowledge
		Pension	Optimal bandwidth	N	Pension	Optimal bandwidth	N
(1) Household income	Low-income	0.410	4.267	293;324	0.264	4.569	293;323
		(0.264)			(0.241)
	Medium-income	0.518	5.404	373;307	0.493	5.096	373;307
		(0.416)			(0.417)
	High-income	0.218	4.973	291;219	−3.146	2.871	101;136
		(1.166)			(23.737)
(2) Income satisfaction	Satisfied	0.132	4.530	476;471	0.065	4.230	476;470
		(0.401)			(0.424)
	Commonly	0.409	5.170	241;205	0.422	4.994	188;159
		(0.326)			(0.321)
	Dissatisfied	1.052	4.229	199;166	0.155	4.965	199;166
		(0.766)			(0.476)

The robust standard error of clustering to the township level is reported in parentheses, with * p < 0.1, * * p < 0.05, * * * p < 0.01. The default minimum mean square error bandwidth is used in the table