Table 2.

Absolute and relative frequencies of satisfaction with the pulmonary rehabilitation program

Questions	Group	Strongly agree	Agree	Neither agree nor disagree	Disagree	Strongly disagree
The information (education and links) provided by the therapist was helpful	PRVC	6 (75)	2 (25)	-	-	-
	PRSD	3 (50)	3 (50)	-	-	-
The frequency of exercise sessions were acceptable	PRVC	4 (50)	3 (37)	1 (13)	-	-
	PRSD	3 (50)	2 (33)	1 (17)	-	-
The duration of exercise sessions was acceptable	PRVC	4 (50)	3 (37)	-	1 (13)	-
	PRSD	3 (50)	2 (33)	1 (17)	-	-
The level of difficulty of exercises was suitable	PRVC	4 (50)	3 (37)	-	-	1 (13)
	PRSD	1 (16)	3 (51)	1 (16)	1 (17)	-
The time taken to collect data was acceptable (e.g., questionnaires)	PRVC	5 (62)	1 (13)	2 (25)	-	-
	PRSD	3 (50)	3 (50)	-	-	-
The frequency of data submission (once a week) was acceptable	PRVC	4 (50)	4 (50)	-	-	-
	PRSD	4 (67)	2 (33)	-	-	-
I found the apps easy to install and use on my phone or tablet	PRVC	6 (76)	1 (12)	1 (12)	-	-
	PRSD	4 (67)	2 (33)	-	-	-
I found the devices (spirometer, pulse oximeter, smart watch, and accelerometer) easy to use	PRVC	3 (37)	2 (25)	2 (25)	-	1 (13)
	PRSD	2 (33)	3 (50)	1 (17)	-	-
I had no major technical difficulties or challenges	PRVC	3 (38)	2 (25)	1 (12)	1 (12)	1 (12)
	PRSD	1 (17)	3 (55)	2 (33)	-	-
I am satisfied with the support received from the research team during the study	PRVC	4 (51)	1 (12)	2 (25)	-	1 (12)
	PRSD	4 (67)	2 (33)	-	-	-
I felt that participating in the program had a positive impact on my overall health	PRVC	5 (62)	2 (25)	-	1 (13)	-
	PRSD	3 (50)	2 (33)	-	1 (17)	-
Overall, I am satisfied with the program	PRVC	4 (50)	2 (25)	2 (25)	-	-
	PRSD	4 (67)	1 (16)	1 (16)	-	-

Data shown as absolute (n) and relative frequency (%). PR_VC: pulmonary rehabilitation via video conference; PR_SD: self-directed pulmonary rehabilitation