Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 25;39(3):516–526. [Article in Chinese] doi: 10.7507/1001-5515.202101091

表 4. Comparison of MAE and MAPE between the algorithm proposed in this paper and the WFPV algorithm on self-test data.

本文算法与WFPV算法在自测数据的MAE、MAPE对比

样本编号 MAE*(MAPE)
WFPV 本文算法
注:* MAE在表中单位为bpm
Subj.1 2.89(2.74%) 1.65(1.31%)
Subj.2 3.59(2.84%) 2.78(2.63%)
Subj.3 2.83(2.09%) 2.83(2.16%)
Subj.4 6.14(5.94%) 4.46(3.20%)
Subj.5 18.42(14.24%) 5.22(4.10%)
Subj.6 7.17(6.30%) 4.91(3.90%)
Subj.7 9.47(7.73%) 4.95(3.41%)
Subj.8 2.76(2.78%) 1.27(1.25%)
Subj.9 2.66(2.20%) 2.29(2.24%)
Subj.10 2.37(2.35%) 1.56(1.45%)
均值 5.83(4.92%) 3.19(2.57%)