Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 19;14:6624. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57152-5

Table 1.

Adjusted mean activity concentration in hourly intervals, shown by median (min;max).

Time p.i 1 h (N = 13) 2 h (N = 8)a 3 h (N = 13)
Striatum
 All patients 15.9 (9.3; 30.7) 14.1 (9.1; 35.4) 19.1 (7.8; 33.6)
 LS 12.6 (9.5; 14.3) 12.4 (9.1; 15.3) 11.8 (7.8; 15.5)
 HS 17.7 (9.3; 30.7) 19.6 (12.7; 35.4) 19.7 (12.2; 33.6)
Putamen
 All patients 15.6 (9.1; 32.0) 13.4 (7.9; 35.5) 18.4 (6.4; 32.9)
 LS 12.0 (9.1; 13.6) 10.7 (7.9; 13.7) 9.9 (6.4; 14.2)
 HS 17.3 (10.0; 32.0) 19.2 (12.9; 35.5) 19.6 (12.0; 32.9)
Caudate nucleus
 All patients 15.4 (8.6; 30.0) 14.4 (10.3; 35.7) 19.4 (9.2; 34.7)
 LS 13.2 (9.9; 14.6) 13.9 (10.3; 16.5) 13.8 (9.2; 16.3)
 HS 17.6 (8.6; 30.0) 19.2 (12.6; 35.7) 20.0 (12.4; 34,6)

Mean activity concentration for patients at 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h p.i.

LS low score patients, HS High score patients.

aFour LS patients and four HS patients had an image acquisition at around 2 h p.i.