Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 13;34(3):295–313. doi: 10.1089/thy.2023.0556

Table 1.

Study and Participant Characteristics of the 35 Included Randomized Controlled Trials

First author (year) Study population (age [years]; % female) Duration (months) Dose (μg/day), selenium compound N Blinding Comparison THRT (total study population) Thyroid status and selenium status at study start Outcomes included in this review
Anastasilakis (2012)55 18–80; 61.6% 3, 6 200, Selenium-methionine 40a No NA Both Euthyroid, mildly deficient TSH,b fT4,b fT3,b TPOAb,b TGAbb
Balázs (2008)64 Mean 41.4 (I), 42.7 (C); 97.7% 12 200, Selenium-methionine 132 Double Placebo Yes NA, NA ↓ TSH, fT4,b fT3,b ↓ TPOAb, = TGAb, = Vol
Bhuyan (2012)75 Mean 34 (I), 31 (C); 88.3% 3 200, Sodium selenite 60 Blinded Placebo Yes Euthyroid or overt hypothyroid, NA ↓ TPOAbc
Bonfig (2010)42 7.6–16.4; 67.3% 12 (1) 100, (2) 200, Sodium selenite 49 No No treatment Yes Overt hypothyroid, NA  = TSH, fT4,b fT3,b = TPOAb, = TGAb, = AE
Chakrabarti (2016)52 Mean 39.6 (I), 34.5 (C); 40% 6 200, Selenious acid 60 Participant blinded Placebo Yes Overt hypothyroid, NA ↓ TSH, = fT4, ↓ MDA
De Farias (2015)76 20–58; 90.9% 3, 6 200, Selenium-methionine 43 Double Placebo Both Euthyroid or subclinical hypothyroid, severely deficient  = TSH, fT4,b = T3, = T4, = TPOAb, = TGAb, ↑ GPX
Duntas (2003)56 22–61; 86.2% 3, 6 200, Selenium-methionine 65 NA Placebo Yes Subclinical hypothyroid, NA  = TSH, = fT4, = T3, = TPOAb, = TGAb
Eskes (2014)65 20–74; 100% 3, 6 200, Sodium selenite 61 Double Placebo No Euthyroid, severely deficient  = TSH, = fT4, = TPOAb, = AE, ↑ SELENOP, = QoL
Esposito (2017)58 17–64; 100% 3, 6 166, Selenium-methionine 76 Blinded Placebo No Euthyroid, NA TSH,b = fT4,d ↑ fT3,d = TPOAb, = Echo, = CXCL-10
Gärtner (2002)57 Mean 47.5; 100% 3 200, Sodium selenite 70 Blinded Placebo Yes Euthyroid,e severely deficient  = TSH, = fT4, = fT3, ↓ TPOAb, ↑ TGAb, = AE, ↑ QoL, ↓ Echo
Hu (2021)70 Mean 38.6; 88.9% 3, 6 200, Selenium yeast 90 No No treatment No Euthyroid or subclinical hypothyroid, severely deficient ↓ TSH, = fT4, = fT3, = TPOAb, = TGAb, = AE
Kachouei (2018)66 18–60; 64.3% 3 200, Sodium selenite 70 Double Placebo Yes Overt hypothyroid, mildly deficient ↑ GPX, ↑ SELENOP
Karanikas (2008)54 19–85; 100% 3 200, Sodium selenite 36 Blinded Placebo Yes Euthyroid,e severely deficient  = TSH, = fT4, = TPOAb, = TNF-α, = IFN-γ, = CD4, = CD8, = IL-2, = IL-4, = IL-10, = IL-13, ↑ QoL
Karimi (2019)69 15–78; 75.8% 3 200, Sodium selenite 66 Patient blinded Placebo Both NA, mildly deficient  = TSH, = TPOAb, = TGAb, = AE
Krysiak (2012)43 18–60; 100% 3, 6 200, Selenium-methionine 164 Double Placebo (1) Yes
(2) No
Euthyroid, NA  = TSH, = fT4, = fT3, ↓ TPOAb, ↓ TGAb (1), = TGAb (2), = AE
Kyrgios (2019)48 4.5–17.8; 80.3% 6 200, Selenium-methionine 71 Double Placebo Both Euthyroid or overt hypothyroid, NA  = TSH, = fT4, ↓ TPOAb, ↓ TGAb, = Vol
Mahmoodianfard (2015)67 25–65; 100% 3 200, NAf 58 Double Placebo Yes Overt hypothyroid. severely deficient  = TSH, = fT4, = T4, = fT3, = T3
Mahmoudi (2021)68 18–60; 88.1% 2 200, Selenium yeast 42 Double Placebo No Subclinical hypothyroid, NA TSH,b T4,b T3,b TPOAbb
Mantovani (2019)50 18–45; 100%, Pregnant (1) 6, (2) 12 (during/after pregnancy) 83, Selenium-methionine 45 Double Placebo Both Euthyroid, severely deficient TSH,b fT4,b fT3,b = TPOAb (1), ↓ TPOAb (2), TGAb,b = AE, = Echo, = Vol, = QoL
Mao (2016)49 NA; 100% Pregnant 2, 5 60, Selenium yeast 31 Double Placebo No Euthyroid or subclinical hypothyroid, sufficient TSH,b fT4,b = TPOAb
Nacamulli (2010)59 15–75; 85.5% 6, 12 80, Sodium selenite 76 Investigator blinded No treatment NA Euthyroid and subclinical hypothyroid, NA  = TSH, = fT4, = TPOAb, = TGAb, ↓ Echo
Negro (2007)51 18–36; 100%; Pregnant ∼11 (0, 5, [12]g Months after delivery) 200, Selenium-methionine 151 Double Placebo Both Euthyroid, severely deficient ↓ TPOAb,c,d = AE
Negro (2016)44 Mean 44 (I), 45 (C); NA 3 (1) 83
(2) 166
(3) 249, Selenium-methionine
80 Double Placebo No Overt hypothyroid, NA  = TSH, = fT4, = CDs
Pilli (2015)45 21–65; 100% 6, 12 (1) 80
(2) 160, Selenium-methionine
60 Blinded Placebo No Euthyroid, mildly deficient  = TSH,d = TPOAb,d = TGAb, = AE, = Echo, = GPX, = SELENOP, ↓ CXCL-9, ↓ CXCL-10, = CXCL-11 (1), ↓ CXCL-11 (2), ↓ TNF-α (1), = TNF-α (2), ↓ IFN-γ (1), = IFN-γ (2), = QoL
Pirola (2016)61 18–65; 84.9% 4 83, Selenium-methionine 192 NA No treatment No Subclinical hypothyroid, NA  = TSH, = fT4, ↓ TPOAb
Preda (2017)62 Mean 46.2 (I), 50.5 (C); 100% 3 100, Selenium-methionine 100 NA NA NA Euthyroid, sufficent ↓ TSH, = TPOAb, = GPX
Shabalina (2019)40 20–40; 100% 3, 6, 9, 12 200, Selenium-methionine 51 No No treatment NA (1) Euthyroid
(2) Subclinical hypothyroid, NA
↓ TSH, ↑ fT4 (1), = fT4 (2), = fT3, = TPOAb,d = AE, = Echo, = Vol
Sun (2021)71 20–64; 68.1% 3 100, Selenium yeast 129 No No treatment Yes Overt hypothyroid, NA  = TSH,d = T4, = T3, = TPOAb, = TGAb, = AE, ↓ IL-2, ↑ IL-10, ↓ TNF-α
Tian (2020)72 >18 (Mean 40.2); 62.5% 3 200, Selenium yeast 32 NA Placebo NA Euthyroid, mildly deficient  = TSH, = TPOAb, = TGAb, = AE, ↓ MDA, ↑ SOD, ↑ TAC
Turker (2006)63 15–77; 100% 3 200, Selenium-methionine 88a Blinded Placebo Yes Euthyroid, NA TSH,b fT4,b fT3,b = TPOAb, = TGAb
Wang (2018)46 15–70; 100% 3, 6 200, Selenium yeast 364 Double Placebo (1) No
(2) Yes
(1) Euthyroid or subclinical hypothyroid
(2) Overt hypothyroid, mildly deficient
 = TSH, = fT4 (1), ↓ fT4 (2), = TPOAb, = AE, ↓ MDA, ↑ GPX
Wu (2018)73 20–71; 51.3% 2 200, Selenium yeast 80 No No treatment Yes NA, NA TSH,b TPOAb,b TGAb,b ↑ CD4/CD8, ↑ CD4/CD3, ↑ CD8/CD3
Yu (2017)74 10–64; 93.3% 3 400, Selenium yeast 60 No No treatment Yes (1) Euthyroid
(2) Overt hypothyroid, severely deficient
TPOAb,b TGAb,b = AE, ↓ IL-2, = IL-10
Zhang (2020)53 32–65; 36.2% 4 200, Sodium selenite 94 No No treatment Yes Overt hypothyroid, NA  = fT4, ↑ fT3, ↓ TPOAb, ↓ TGAb, = AE, ↓ TRAb, ↑ CD3, ↑ CD4, ↓ CD8, ↑ CD4/CD8
Zhu (2012)47 15–70; 100% 3, 6 200, Selenium yeast 134 Blinded Placebo NA (1) Euthyroid or subclinical hypothyroid
(2) Overt hypothyroid, mildly deficient
TSH,b fT4,b = TPOAb (1), ↓ TPOAb (2)
a

Only participants receiving same intervention throughout the entire study considered.

b

Results not available.

c

Data estimated from other studies.

d

Results extracted from graphs.

e

Participants already on THRT at study start and therefore reported euthyroid at study start.

f

One intervention group and its corresponding comparison group additionally received 30 mg zinc per day.

g

Time point 12 months after delivery was not included in our analysis to increase comparability with other studies.

↑, Significant increase; ↓, significant decrease; = , no significant effect; (1) Cohort 1; (2) Cohort 2; (C) Control group; (I) Intervention group receiving selenium supplementation; AE, adverse event; Echo, ultrasound echogenicity; fT3, free triiodothyronine; fT4, free thyroxine; GPX, glutathione peroxidases; IFN-γ, interferon-gamma; IL, interleukin; MDA, malondialdehyde; NA, not reported in publication; QoL, quality of life; SELENOP, selenoprotein P; SOD, superoxide dismutase; T3, total triiodothyronine; T4, total thyroxine; TAC, total antioxidant capacity; TGAb, thyroglobulin antibodies; THRT, thyroid hormone replacement therapy; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha; TPOAb, thyroid peroxidase antibodies; TRAb, thyrotropin receptor antibody; TSH, thyrotropin; Vol, thyroid volume.