Table 4.
Clinical Lab Opportunities for Optimizing Colorectal Cancer Screening and Outcomes
Opportunity | Challenge | Intervention |
---|---|---|
Optimize screening participation | Suboptimal screening rates | Establish infrastructure to implement mailed outreach programs |
Implement embedded EHR tools to allow for standing orders at point of lab care for screening tests such as FIT for patients not up to date (“Lab-FIT”) | ||
Optimize screening effectiveness | Subpar patient instructions | Distribute instructions following best practices for literacy, with consideration for wordless instructions, multiple translations, and links to instructional videos |
Distribution of low performance stool tests | Phase out gFOBT and more broadly adopt FIT | |
Select FIT brands with consistently good performance characteristics | ||
Discarding of irreplaceable FITs due to missing collection dates | Result FITs missing collection dates or out of window from collection to processing and report abnormal results, and advise repeat testing for normal results | |
Non-reporting of quantitative FIT values that correlate closely with probability of neoplasia | Support implementation of quantitative FIT reporting Report quantitative fecal hemoglobin values | |
Low rates of colonoscopy follow up after an abnormal non-invasive CRC screening test | Flag abnormal results as critical values, provide education on test result interpretation, partner to create registries of patients with abnormal lab-based CRC screening test results | |
Socioeconomic variability in access | Promote access to FDA/CMS approved testing | |
Reduce inappropriate screening test exposure | High rates of FIT overuse/misuse in emergency department and inpatient settings | Eliminate or restrict emergency department and inpatient use of CRC screening tests such as FIT and guaiac FOBT |