Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jan 4.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Chem. 2024 Jan 4;70(1):150–164. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvad198

Table 4.

Clinical Lab Opportunities for Optimizing Colorectal Cancer Screening and Outcomes

Opportunity Challenge Intervention
Optimize screening participation Suboptimal screening rates Establish infrastructure to implement mailed outreach programs
Implement embedded EHR tools to allow for standing orders at point of lab care for screening tests such as FIT for patients not up to date (“Lab-FIT”)
Optimize screening effectiveness Subpar patient instructions Distribute instructions following best practices for literacy, with consideration for wordless instructions, multiple translations, and links to instructional videos
Distribution of low performance stool tests Phase out gFOBT and more broadly adopt FIT
Select FIT brands with consistently good performance characteristics
Discarding of irreplaceable FITs due to missing collection dates Result FITs missing collection dates or out of window from collection to processing and report abnormal results, and advise repeat testing for normal results
Non-reporting of quantitative FIT values that correlate closely with probability of neoplasia Support implementation of quantitative FIT reporting Report quantitative fecal hemoglobin values
Low rates of colonoscopy follow up after an abnormal non-invasive CRC screening test Flag abnormal results as critical values, provide education on test result interpretation, partner to create registries of patients with abnormal lab-based CRC screening test results
Socioeconomic variability in access Promote access to FDA/CMS approved testing
Reduce inappropriate screening test exposure High rates of FIT overuse/misuse in emergency department and inpatient settings Eliminate or restrict emergency department and inpatient use of CRC screening tests such as FIT and guaiac FOBT