Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 11;29(2):105–135. doi: 10.1111/resp.14656

TABLE 5.

Recent seminal studies with vasodilator therapies in IPF and other ILD cohorts.

Study Year Population Number patients Primary endpoint Outcome

INCREASE 111

Treprostinil

Versus placebo

Phase 2/3

2021 ILD with PH confirmed by right heart catheter 326 Change in 6MWD at 16‐weeks Improved 6MWD in treatment arm of 31.12 m (95% CI, 16.85–45.39; p < 0.001); improved NT‐proBNP, reduced clinical worsening, compared with control arm.

Sildenafil plus pirfenidone versus placebo plus pirfenidone 68

Phase 2b

2021 IPF with DLCO ≤40% predicted and mPAP ≥20 mm Hg 177 Proportion with disease progression (change in 6MWD, respiratory hospitalization, death) at 52‐weeks

No difference in the primary endpoint, between‐group difference 3.06% (95% CI –11.30 to 17.97; p = 0.65).

RISE‐IIP 112

Riociguat versus placebo

Phase 2b

2019 IIP with PH confirmed by right heart catheter 147 Change in 6MWD at 26‐weeks No difference in the primary endpoint or time to clinical worsening; trial terminated early due to increased SAEs including death in treatment arm.

INSTAGE 113

Sildenafil plus nintedanib versus placebo plus nintedanib

Phase 3

2018 IPF patients with DLCO ≤35% predicted 274 Change in baseline total SGRQ score at 12‐weeks

No difference in mean change in SGRQ score (treatment arm −1.28 points, control arm −0.77 points; p = 0.72).

No difference in dyspnoea scores or safety.

BPHIT 114

Bosentan versus placebo

Phase 2

2014 Fibrotic IIP with right heart catheter confirmed PH 60 Fall from baseline pulmonary vascular resistance index of 20% or more at 16 weeks No difference in invasive pulmonary haemodynamics, functional capacity or symptoms.

ARTEMIS‐IPF 115

Ambrisentan versus placebo

Phase 3

2013 IPF patients with ≤5% honeycombing on HRCT scan 492 Time to disease progression (death, respiratory hospitalization, decrease in FVC and DLCO); 48‐week assessment

Increased disease progression in treatment arm (90 [27.4%] vs. 28 [17.2%] patients; p < 0.010; hazard ratio, 1.74 [95% CI, 1.14–2.66])

STEP‐IPF 116

Sildenafil versus placebo

Phase 3

2010 IPF patients with DLCO ≤35% predicted 180

Proportion of patients with an increase in 6MWD ≥20%

No difference in proportion meeting primary endpoint (treatment arm 10%, control arm 7%; p = 0.39); some secondary endpoints improved with treatment

Abbreviations: 6MWD, six‐minute walk distance; DLCO, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide; FVC, forced vital capacity.; HRCT, high resolution computed tomography; IIP, idiopathic interstitial pneumonia; ILD, interstitial lung disease; IPF, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; mPAP, mean pulmonary artery pressure; NT‐proBNP, N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide; PH, pulmonary hypertension; SAE, serious adverse event; SGRQ, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire.