Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 6;113(6):1304–1314. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2888

Table 4.

Correlation (R value) between APAP‐Cys, APAP‐Sul, % CYP metabolites (CYP metabolites/total metabolites) and risk factors for liver injury and outcomes

APAP‐Cys APAP‐Sul % CYP metabolites APAP‐Cys/APAP‐Sul
R value (95% CI) R value (95% CI) R value (95% CI) R value (95% CI)
(n = 200) (n = 200) (n = 200) (n = 200)
Risk factors

Dose (mg/kg)b

(n = 197)

0.26 (0.13 to 0.39) 0.19 (0.05 to 0.32) −0.08 (−0.22 to 0.07) 0.09 (−0.05 to 0.23)

Agea

(n = 200)

0.08 (−0.07 to 0.22) 0.29 (0.15 to 0.41) −0.02 (−0.17 to 0.12) −0.09 (−0.23 to 0.05)

Time post ingestiona

(n = 200)

0.45 (0.32 to 0.55) −0.28 (−0.41 to −0.14) 0.49 (0.38 to 0.60) 0.49 (0.38 to 0.59)

Acetaminophen ratiob

(n = 200)

0.61 (0.52 to 0.69) 0.004 (−0.13 to 0.14) 0.19 (0.06 to 0.32) 0.40 (0.27 to 0.51)
Outcomes

Peak ALTa

(n = 199)

0.39 (0.26 to 0.50) −0.14 (−0.28 to 0.00) 0.36 (0.23 to 0.48) 0.34 (0.21 to 0.46)

Peak INRa

(n = 165)

0.47 (0.34 to 0.59) −0.27 (−0.41 to −0.12) 0.50 (0.38 to 0.61) 0.38 (0.51 to 0.62)
a

Spearman R correlation.

b

Pearson R correlation.