Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 20;130(8):866–879. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17443

TABLE 2.

Reported summary statistics.

Author Year Plurality GA at measurement (weeks) Cutoff CL (mm) Definition of PTB (weeks) AUC Sensitivity Specificity LR+ LR− % Probability of PTB Notes
Honest 2003 Singleton <20 25 32 4.10 0.75
Crane 2008 Singleton <20 25 32 3.18
Honest 2003 Singleton <20 15 34 30.53 0.90 Same single study result
Crane 2008 Singleton <20 15 35 30.53 Same single study result
Honest 2012 Singleton 14–20 15 34 142.86 0.89
Honest 2003 Singleton <20 20 34 14.47 0.90
Domin 2010 Singleton 14–25 ≤20 35 0.89 22.1 98.2 12.4 0.40
Honest 2003 Singleton <20 25 34 6.29 0.79
Honest 2009/2012 Singleton 14–20 25 34 13.38 0.80
Crane 2008 Singleton <20 25 35 4.31 0.68
Domin 2010 Singleton 14–25 ≤25 35 0.85 33.3 95.9 6.30 0.65
Honest 2003 Singleton <20 30 34 2.84 0.75
Honest 2012 Singleton 14–20 30 34 2.48 0.81
Crane 2008 Singleton <20 30 35 3.23
Leitich 1999 Singleton 20 30 37 33 91
Honest 2003 Singleton <20 30 37 3.77 0.73
Honest 2003 Singleton 20–24 20 34 7.64 0.79
Honest 2012 Singleton 20–24 20 34 7.64 0.79
Domin 2010 Singleton 14–25 ≤20 35 0.89 22.1 98.2 12.4 0.40
Honest 2003 Singleton 20–24 25 32 4.19 0.40
Crane 2008 Singleton 20–24 25 32 2.38
Honest 2003 Singleton 20–24 25 34 4.40 0.67
Honest 2009 Singleton 20–24 25 34 4.68 0.68
Crane 2008 Singleton 20–24 25 35 2.78 0.55
Domin 2010 Singleton 14–25 ≤25 35 0.85 33.3 95.9 6.30 0.65
Honest 2003 Singleton 20–24 30 34 2.28 0.60
Crane 2008 Singleton 20–24 30 35 1.75
Honest 2009/2012 Singleton 20–24 32.5 37 3.99 0.33
Domin 2010 Singleton 14–25 ≤33.15 37 0.83 32.7 90 4.90 0.60
Honest 2003 Singleton >24 15 34 7.08 0.93
Crane 2008 Singleton >24 15 35 5.64
Honest 2003 Singleton >24 20 34 5.83 0.81
Crane 2008 Singleton >24 20 35 5.16
Honest 2003 Singleton >24 25 34 4.07 0.62
Crane 2008 Singleton >24 25 35 4.01 0.72
Honest 2003 Singleton >24 30 34 2.70 0.52
Crane 2008 Singleton >24 30 35 2.23
Honest 2003 Singleton >24 30 37 2.49 0.79
Crane 2008 Singleton >24 30 37 2.27
Honest 2003 Twin 20 20 34 59.89 0.71
Lim 2011 Twin not specified 20 34 30 94 5.00 0.74
Conde‐Agudelo 2014 Twin 20–24 20 34 29 97 9.00 0.74
Kindinger 2016 Twin 20 20 32–36 20.60
Kindinger 2016 Twin 22 20 32–36 26.50
Kindinger 2016 Twin 24 20 32–36 33.10
Conde‐Agudelo 2010 Twin 20–24 ≤25 32 0.8 54 91 6.00 0.51
Conde‐Agudelo 2014 Twin 20–24 25 32 10.10 0.64
Kindinger 2016 Twin 20 25 28–32 35.00
Kindinger 2016 Twin 22 25 28–32 32.40
Kindinger 2016 Twin 24 25 28–32 29.30
Honest 2003 Twin 20–24 25 34 5.02 0.75
Lim 2011 Twin not specified 25 34 36 94 6.00 0.68
Conde‐Agudelo 2014 Twin 20–24 ≤25 34 40 93 5.80 0.65
Kindinger 2016 Twin 20 25 32–36 25.00
Kindinger 2016 Twin 22 25 32–36 31.10
Kindinger 2016 Twin 24 25 32–36 37.60
Honest 2003 Twin 20–24 30 34 2.31 0.69
Conde‐Agudelo 2010 Twin 20–24 30 34 56 81 3.00 0.55
Kindinger 2016 Twin 20 30 32–36 28.50
Kindinger 2016 Twin 22 30 32–36 34.30
Kindinger 2016 Twin 24 30 32–36 40.30
Honest 2003 Twin >24 25 34 1.82 0.83
Conde‐Agudelo 2010 Twin >24 25 34 44 81 2.30 0.70
Kindinger 2016 Twin 24 25 32–36 37.60
Kindinger 2016 Twin 26 25 32–36 44.30
Honest 2003 Twin >24 25 37 1.89 0.73
Conde‐Agudelo 2010 Twin >24 25 37 43 77 1.80 0.75
Conde‐Agudelo 2014 Twin 20–24 25 37 21 95 4.40 0.80
Kindinger 2016 Twin 24 25 ≥36 19.00
Kindinger 2016 Twin 26 25 ≥36 19.40
Honest 2003 Twin >24 30 34 2.11 0.61
Lim 2011 Twin not specified 30 34 41 87 3.15 0.32
Kindinger 2016 Twin 24 30 32–36 40.30
Kindinger 2016 Twin 26 30 32–36 46.30
Honest 2003 Twin >24 35 34 1.84 0.29
Lim 2011 Twin not specified 35 34 78 66 2.29 0.33
Kindinger 2016 Twin 24 35 32–36 40.70
Kindinger 2016 Twin 26 35 32–36 45.90

Note: Cells are blank where a summary statistic was not reported. Italicised numbers were not reported in the original paper, but calculated from data in the review.

Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; CL, cervical length; GA, gestational age; LR, likelihood ratio; PTB, preterm birth.