Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 19;3:100151. doi: 10.1016/j.dialog.2023.100151

Table 3.

Association between EAT-Lancet score and different models assessing difference in weight and waist circumference (WC).


β (95% CI)
EAT-Lancet score 0–7 8 9 10 11–14
Follow-up weighta
 with baseline adjustment Reference -0.12 (-0.29, 0.05) -0.05 (-0.22, 0.11) -0.19 (-0.37, -0.02) -0.08 (-0.27, 0.11)
 w/ob baseline adjustment Reference -0.52 (-0.93, -0.11) -0.48 (-0.88, -0.09) -0.73 (-1.14, -0.31) -0.92 (-1.38, -0.45)
Follow-up WCc
 with baseline adjustment Reference -0.14 (-0.41, 0.14) -0.10 (-0.36, 0.16) -0.19 (-0.47, 0.08) -0.38 (-0.69, -0.07)
 w/o baseline adjustment Reference -0.48 (-0.87, -0.09) -0.50 (-0.88, -0.12) -0.81 (-1.21, -0.42) -1.54 (-1.98, -1.10)

Multivariable linear regression analyses adjusted for sex (male, female), age at inclusion (years), physical activity (≥30 min/day, <30 min/day of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity), education (vocational, short 1–2 years, medium 3–4 years, high >4 years), smoking status (never, former, current <15 g tobacco/day, current 15–25 g tobacco/day, current >25 g tobacco/day), alcohol intake (g/day, restricted cubic splines with 4 knots), and previous history of hypertension (yes, no, don’t know), hypercholesterolemia (yes, no, don’t know), diabetes (yes, no, don’t know), stroke (yes, no), and acute myocardial infarction (yes, no) before baseline.

a

Total N = 44,194 included in weight analyses.

b

w/o, without.

c

Total N = 43,678 included in WC analyses.