Abstract
NAD+ biology is involved in controlling redox balance, functioning as a coenzyme in numerous enzymatic reactions, is a cofactor for Sirtuin enzymes and a substrate for multiple regulatory enzyme reactions within and outside the cell. At the same time, NAD+ levels are diminished with aging and are consumed during the development of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases linked to aberrant immune activation. Direct NAD+ augmenation via the NAD+ salvage and Priess-Handler pathways are being investigated as putative therapeutic interventions to improve healthspan in inflammation-linked diseases. In this review, we survey NAD+ biology and its pivotal roles in the regulation of immunity and inflammation. Furthermore, we discuss emerging studies evaluating NAD+-boosting in murine models and in human diseases and highlight areas of research that remain unresolved in understanding the mechanisms of actions of these nutritional supplementation strategies.
Keywords: NAD+-boosting, Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, Immunometabolism, Inflammation, CD38, Sirtuins, Sterile alpha and HEAT/Armadillo motif, Poly(ADP ribose) polymerase, NLRP3 inflammasome, Type I Interferon, Cytotoxic T lymphocytes
Introduction
Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) biology was initially understood in the context of its bidirectional flux with NADH or between NADP+ and NADPH in oxidation-reduction reactions, for energy transduction and redox homeostasis. The intracellular NAD+/NADH and NADP+/NADPH pools are highly compartmentalized and their disruption contribute to aging and disease (1, 2). Concurrently, non-redox effects of NAD+, where NAD+ transport, biosynthesis, and catabolism enable diverse roles in the regulation of energy transduction, in cell signaling, as a post-translational modifier, and as an epigenetic mediator have become apparent (3). At the organelle level, homeostatic control of mitochondrial integrity, function and metabolic signaling is governed, in part, by NAD+ biochemistry, and the activity of this organelle is tightly integrated with NAD+ levels (4, 5). In the immune system, these concepts are intergrated in that perturbed mitochondrial fidelity and function and abberations in NAD+ metabolism are linked components of autoimmune and inflammatory degenerative diseases and aging (6, 7). This pathophysiological connection between mitochondria and inflammation is partially underpinned where mitochondrial infidelity and dysfunction, operate as signaling platforms to initiate intracellular and extracellular immune activation signaling (8–10).
Therapeutic strategies including nutritional supplements and agents that modify NAD+ levels are being investigated as approaches to modulate degenerative diseases, including inflammatory and autoimmune diseases (11–14). In this review, we focus on highlighting NAD+ metabolism in the immune system, and uncover the emerging understanding of how NAD+-boosting functions as a potential therapeutic strategy targeting inflammatory and autoimmune-linked diseases.
Overview of Metabolic Demands in Immunity
In principle, the regulation of cellular metabolism is coordinated with energy demands and to fulfill biosynthetic, and redox control processes within cells. This concept was initially advanced by Otto Warburg, where he decribed how metabolic substrates orchestrated demands above and beyond bioenergetic needs (15). This effect in cancer cells implicated aerobic glycolysis as the preferential energy production source, enabling mitochondrial metabolism divertion to generate intermediates for biomass synthesis (e.g., nucleotides, amino acids, and lipids) to facilitate increased cell division (15). The spectrum of energy demand in immune cells show similar dynamism, as immune cells exhibit diverse functional fates spanning from quiescent to proliferative, and for undergoing differentiation and/or activation (8). Furthermore, cellular energetic requirements are increased to enable immune cell migration and phagocytosis (8). Some of these immune cell fates align with the metabolic mileau of cancer, where immune cells similarly display the Warburg metabolic profiles (8). At the same time, it should be noted that anaerobic glycolysis is not the only dominant fuel substrate in high-metabolic demand cells. Glutaminolysis and glutamine oxidation similarly function in this role, which in turn, diverts other substrates to biosynthetic functions to support cellular proliferation and function, whether in cancer or immune cell regulation (16, 17).
The Foundational Role of Metabolic Remodeling in Immune Cell Fate
The functional contribution of metabolic pathways in immune cell function are now recognized given that molecular alteration of metabolite availability remodels immune cell fates. Examples of this include restraint in polarization of CD4+ helper cells (TH) to TH17 cells by disruption of either de novo fatty acid synthesis or glucose uptake (18, 19). In both instances, TH17 polarization becomes impeded due to metabolic and epigenetic regulatory control and manifests with reduced autoimmune disease susceptibility (18, 19). Concurrently, specific intrinsic metabolic pathways are remodeled directly during immune cell activation. For example, innate immune cell activation constipates specific catabolic transitions within the mitochondrial tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) resulting in accumulation of upstream substrates including citrate and succinate. These intermediates then orchestrate proinflammatory signaling via a myriad of signaling mechanisms (20). Additionally, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) upregulates the immune responsive gene 1 (irg1) encoded enzyme which decarboxylates the TCA cycle intermediate cis-aconitate to generate itaconate. Itaconate then directly orchestrates anti-inflammatory and anti-microbial effects (21–24). The role of itaconate as a signaling metabolite is similarly operational in T cells, albeit via indirect control. Here, myeloid cell derived itaconate is imported into CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), resulting in blunting of nucleotide synthesis, with amelioration of proliferative and cytolytic activity of these tumor infiltrating cells (23). Together, these diverse contributions of metabolic pathways to immune cell regulation are termed immunometabolism and are recognized to play pivotal roles in overall immunoregulation (20, 25).
The Central Role of NAD+ in Cellular Metabolism and Homeostasis
Cellular compartment specific NAD+/NADH ratios broadly reflect redox balance supporting metabolism through innumerable metabolic oxidoreductive enzyme reactions within the cytoplasm and mitochondria. Here, NAD+ is recognized as an essential recycling co-enzyme to maintain metabolism and cellular homeostasis (3). To sustain its non-redox enzyme functions, intracellular NAD+ levels are controlled by the balance between NAD+ uptake, intracellular biosynthesis, enzymatic NAD+ consumption and the regulation of different intracellular NAD+ pools. The major intracellular NAD+ pools reside within mitochondria and the cytosol, which, together with the nucleus, are the major sites for non-redox functions (26). In mammalian cells NAD+ is synthesized by three main pathways: (i) de novo biosynthesis pathway, through the Kynurenine pathway, where tryptophan as the precursor, is catabolized to quinolinic acid, to generate NAD+; (ii) the Priess-Handler pathway utlizes nicotinic acid (NA) as its initial substrate; and (iii) the salvage pathway employs the NAD+ intermediate nicotinamide (NAM), or its nucleosides, nicotinamide riboside (NR) and nicotinic acid riboside (NAR) to restore NAD+ levels (3, 26). A recent study in mice additionally showed that the gut microbiome plays an important role in endogenous NAD+ biology, where circulating NAM and oral NR are converted to NA which, in turn, are reabsorbed into the circulation as a precursor for the Priess-Handler pathway (27). Furthermore, as biologic membranes are impermeable to pyridine nucleotides, NAD+ synthesis may be compartment specific. Consistent with this, there are distinct subcellular enzyme isoforms governing NAD+ biosynthetic pathways (26, 28), as epitomized by distinct nicotinamide mononucleotide adenyltransferes (NMNAT) nuclear, cytosolic and mitochondrial isoforms (29). A more recent discovery of a mitochondrial NAD+ transporter SLC25A51 on the inner mitochondrial membrane identifies yet another mechanism for targeted intracellular NAD+ transport (30–32).
NAD+ Biochemistry in Immune Cell Function
Immunomodulation linked to NAD+biosynthetic pathways
Given the metabolic ‘remodeling’ link to immune cell fate and function, NAD+ plays a central role in the regulation of immunity. At the level of NAD+ biosynthesis, the de novo NAD+ synthesis through the Kynurerine pathway, is operational in murine macrophages (33). This is evident in that genetic and pharmacologic disruption of de novo NAD+ biosynthesis impair macrophage phagocytosis and resolution of inflammation (33). Interestingly, these features recapitulate the aging macrophage phenotype and are mediated, in part, by disrupting macrophage mitochondrial bioenergetic capacity (33). The regulation is more complex though, as LPS triggered innate immunity upregulates proximal, but blunts distal enzymes, in the de novo NAD+ biosynthesis pathway. This results in accumulation of intermediates downstream of tryptophan, in parallel with reduced NAD+ and its precursors NA mononucleotide (NAMN) and NA adenine dinucleotide (NAAD) (33). Interestingly, constipation of this pathway with subsequent pro-inflammatory effects recapitulate concepts operational in the TCA cycle as described above. Furthermore, catabolism of tryptophan is not restricted to the Kynurerine pathway, as tryptophan is also metabolized to 5-hydroxytryptophan and indole derivatives by the liver and gut microbiome (34). Intermediates in these pathways confer context specific pro- and anti-inflammatory effects in multiple organs (34). Given the promiscuity of the catabolism of tryptophan, its use as a NAD+-boosting supplement is therefore limited and not extensively discussed further in this review. The most robust data on immunoregulation is evident following supplemention of intermediates that feed the NAD+ salvage and/or Priess-Handler pathways. These data are expanded upon later in the review, in the context of animal models and human diseases linked to inflammation and autoimmunity.
Immunomodulation linked to NAD+consumption pathways
The major NAD+ consumption pathways in immune cells include: the NAD+ glycohydrolase (NADase) - CD38; the sterile alpha and HEAT/Armadillo motif (SARM) - a Toll/IL-1 receptor adaptor family (TIR) member (SARM1); the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) family of enzymes, and sirtuin deacylase enzymes. Their immune roles are summarized below.
CD38 has immunomodulatory effects that are dependent or independent on its NADase activity. NADase independent effects include CD38 cyclase activity which modulates ADP ribose levels (35), and CD38 functions as a structural component of the B cell receptor complex (36). Additionally, CD38 usually exhibits a type II membrane orientation, with its catalytic site being extracellular, although an intracellular orientation and soluble intra- and extra-cellular forms are evident (37). In mice CD38 levels increase with aging and associate with impaired immunity of inflammaging (37). CD38 levels similarly rise with aggregate systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity (38). Here, elevated CD8+ T cell’s CD38 levels blunt cellular cytotoxicity (39), and in parallel with CD38 expression, whole blood NAD+ levels diminish with increasing SLE disease activity (13). Interestingly, in young CD38 KO mice, there was no change in immune cell NAD+ levels and CD38 was not required for LPS-induced M1 macrophage polarization (37). In contrast, with aging, genotoxic stress, and senescence-associated secretory phenotype elevated macrophage CD38 levels promote the decline of NAD+ and nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) levels in a CD38-dependent manner, in parallel with increased M1 macrophage polarization (37, 40).
SARM1 also possesses NADase activity (41). Interestingly, SARM1 conveys anti-rather than pro-inflammatory regulation in contrast to other TIR family members, such as MyD88 and TRIF, by inhibiting toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling through interactions with TRIF and MyD88 (41). The molecular mechanism whereby SARM1 functions as an NADase has recently been uncovered, where dimerization of the SARM1 TIR domain possesses NADase activity (42). Despite this, the role of NAD+ consumption in SARM1 immunomodulatory effects remains unresolved.
PARP enzymes consume NAD+ where the PARP catalytic domains transfer ADP-ribose moieties from NAD+ to amino acid residues leading to protein mono- or poly-ADP-ribosylation (MARylation or PARylation). These modifications affect DNA repair, cell differentiation, gene transcription and signal transduction. There are 17 human PARPs, and different members catalyze ribosylation reactions in different cell types and within different subcellular compartments. The immunoregulatory effects of these isoforms have been reviewed (43), and only a few examples will be discussed here. LPS-mediated induction of macrophage activation upregulates PARP1, which then PARylates the NF-κB subunit p65/relA to transduce inflammation (44). This activation similarly increases macrophage NAD+ consumption (33). In contrast PARP9 and PARP14 confer counterregulatory effects on macrophage polarization towards the M2 fate (45). The genetic KO of PARP1 and PARP2 exhibit regulatory roles in CD4+ T cell differentiation, in B cell development and in antibody production (43, 46). Although the role of PARylation in lymphocyte biology has not been comprehensively defined (43, 46), immunomodulatory effects of PARPs appear to be independent of their enzymatic activities (43). This points to the complexity of this regulation implicates that PARP enzymes function via both NAD+ consumption dependent and independent pathways.
Finally, NAD+ functions as a cofactor for Sirtuin enzyme activation and its catabolism generates nicotinamide and 2’-O-acetyl-ADP-ribose. The 7 Sirtuin enzymes (SIRT1 through SIRT7) initiate numerous deacylase effects, including posttranslational modification such as deacetylation and desuccinylation (47, 48) on histones and non-histone proteins. SIRT1, SIRT2 and SIRT6 mediated deacetylation of the NF-κB p65 subunit blunts its transcriptional activity to limit macrophage inflammation (49). In parallel, LPS-mediated metabolic remodeling to favor glycolysis as a component of macrophage activation and IL-1β production, is associated with the downregulation of SIRT5 and increased succinylation of glycolytic enzymes (50). Furthermore, succinylation stabilizes the HIF-1α transcription factor which augments glycolysis, and SIRT5’s anti-inflammatory effects operate, in part, via desuccinylation of glycolytic intermediates to modify glycolysis and the nuclear regulation of HIF-1α (48, 50). The mitochondrial enriched SIRT3 similarly blunts the NLRP3 inflammasome via deacetylation and activation of the mitochondrial superoxide dismutase SOD2 (51). The Sirtuin enzymes are also operational in adaptive immune cells, where SIRT1 silences the transcription factor which upregulates IL-2 production, thereby decreasing TH1 activation (52). In parallel, SIRT1-deficient T cells are more proliferative, produce more IL-2 and exhibit greater susceptibility to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) (53). SIRT1 and SIRT3 additionally have immunomodulatory roles in regulatory CD8+ T cell and in B cell function (54). Finally, consistent with the role of NAD+ in Sirtuin activation, the genetic disruption of de novo NAD+ biosynthesis in mouse peritoneal macrophages directly blunts SIRT3 and SOD2 activity (33).
In summary, emerging evidence points to extensive contributions of NAD+ consumption pathways, and their subcellular compartmentalization in the modulation of innate and adaptive immunity. Together these highlight multiple levels of regulation and ultimately need to be understood in an integrated manner to appreciate the role of NAD+ biology in fine-tuning immunoregulation.
NAD+-Boosting: Approaches and Consequences
Dietary supplementation with intermediates including NAM, NMN and NR have all been shown to boost NAD+ levels in mice and humans (55–58). Furthermore, NAD+ has been administered via intraperitoneal administration (59). Finally, the pharmacologic inhibition of NAD+ consumption pathways may similarly confer therapeutic effects, which will also be described below. Prior to exploring these pharmacologic and dietary supplemental strategies, data in cell culture further implicate regulatory roles of NAD+ biology in immunity. Examples of this include regulation of the mitochondrial NAD+ transporter, SLC25A51 during CD4+ T cell activation (60). Furthermore, the genetic induction of nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT), a salvage pathway enzyme, in primary human and mouse monocytes cofers polarization towards inflammatory M1 macrophages and similarly NAMPT inhibition blunts this polarization (61). NAMPT inhibition similarly impairs NLRP3-dependent inflammation in primary human monocytes (62).
Immune Effects of NAD+ Modulation in Animal Models
NAD+-boosting was initially shown to modulate immunoregulation following NMN supplementation in aging mice. Here, 12-months of NMN suppressed gene signatures of age-associated adipose tissue inflammation and altered the leucocyte population by reducing neutrophils and increasing lymphocyte levels (63). Three months of NR supplementation similarly reduced neuroinflammation in a genetic Alzheimer’s disease (AD) model (64). In a subsequent study in transgenic β-amyloid induced AD, NR supplementation from 7 to 9 months of age broadly reduced transcript levels of inflammatory mediators in the hippocampus, reduced brain and plasma cytokines levels and diminished astrocytes and microglia activation, in part, by blunting the NLRP3 inflammasome (65). In parallel, NR diminished neuronal DNA damage, and the concomitant DNA damage sensing inflammatory pathway mediated by intracellular cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) and stimulator of interferon genes (STING) (65). NR and NMN supplementation prior to and during cisplatin and kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury, blunted renal damage via an NAD+-dependent reduction in mitochondrial RNA release (66). This, in turn ameliorated activation of the cytosolic pattern recognition receptor retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I), to attenuate renal leukocyte infiltration (66).
The most comprehensive immunological work on NAD+-boosting is in the murine model of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) induced EAE. Here, NAM supplementation at the time of MOG inoculation or starting 10-days post-innoculation reduced axonal demyelination and CD4+ T cell infiltration into the spinal cord (67). Similarly, intraperitoneal NAD+ preceding, in conjunction with, or delayed administration after MOG inoculation, attenuated EAE by: (i) increasing levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10 in TH1 cells and TGF-β1 in TH17 cells (59); (ii) activating AMPK and SIRT1 mediated blunting of TH1 and TH17 cytokine production (68); (iii) reducing myeloid cell NF-κB signaling (69); and (iv) via activation of autophagy in parallel with NLRP3 inflammasome attenuation (70). The role of NAD+ consumptive enzymes has also begun to be investigated in EAE, where CD38 levels are induced in multiple sclerosis (71, 72), and CD38 KO attenuates EAE (72).
On a note of caution, the indiscriminate augmentation of NAD+ biosynthesis to blunt autoimmunity may be too simplistic a concept. This circumspection is based on contradictory data, as evident by the blunting of EAE via pharmacologic inhibition of NAMPT by FK866 (73). This is due to diminution of T-cell viability resulting in blunted T-cell mediated autoimmunity (73). Interestingly, FK866-mediated NAD+ depletion is evident in activated but not resting T lymphocytes, highlighting differences in NAD+ biosynthetic and consumption pathway functional roles aligned with cell fate-dependent cellular bioenergetic demands. In a similar vain, pharmacologic inhibition of the kynurenine pathway with the QPRT inhibitor, 3-nitropyriine-2-thione or the NMNAT inhibitor, tannic acid similarly blunted murine EAE (72). Here, the kynurenine pathway was shown to be induced by EAE in myeloid derived microglial cells rather than in astrocytes. The complexity of this biology was further realized, where primary astrocytes in response to EAE modeling by LPS and IFNγ supplementation, showed activation of the salvage pathway, rather than the kynurenine pathway, and FK866 similarly blunted astrocytic inflammation (72). Interestingly, astocytes show elevated expression of the gene encoding CD38 (71, 74) and induction of CD38 by EAE exacerbated NAD+ depletion. However, in contrast to blocking the salvage pathway, the inhibition or genetic depletion of CD38 in this study blunted EAE. The mechanisms underlying the proinflammatory effects of CD38 include signaling through cyclic adenosine diphosphate ribose (cADPR) and ADPR, which are derived during NAD+ hydrolysis. These signaling intermediates, promoted chemokine signaling to augment astrocytic chemoattraction of inflammatory monocytes (72). Together these data implicate that the modulation of NAD+ levels in lymphoid, myeloid and non-professional immune cells (astrocytes) contribute to the susceptibility of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. At the same time, divergent data with NAD+ supplementation, CD38 modulation and inhibition of NAD+ biosynthesis implicate that: (i) spatial, temporal and/or absolute levels of NAD+ may have opposing effects; (ii) NAD+ hydrolysis intermediates have independent pro-inflammatory signaling; and/or that (iii) pharmacologic inhibition may have broader and yet undetermined off-target effects on the overall inflammatory signatures in in vivo models.
At the same time, NAD+-boosting augments CD8+ CTLs function, which as effector cells, confer tumor cytotoxic effects and kill virally infected cells. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), functionally distinct CTLs, possess high metabolic demands to promote tumor lysis. In this context, CD8+ T cell exhaustion is inextricable linked to metabolic ‘failure’ which span from mitochondrial depolarization, reduced mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number to excess mitochondrial ROS production (75). Similar features are evident in hepatitis B virus targeting CTLs, and here, it was found that their incapacity to augment oxidative phosphorylation diminished their capacity to generate cytotoxic cytokines (76). As may be expected, in these cells, increasing NAD+ may augment cytotoxic function. This has been shown in TILs, where NR supplementation improved mitochondrial fitness, reduced mitochondrial ROS, and enhanced cytotoxic activity in vitro, and intratumoral NR administration diminished tumor growth in vivo (75). The role of NAD+ biology in TILs is further evident in that NAMPT expression is reduced in TILs, and NAD+ supplementation enhanced anti-tumor efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) modified T cells (CAR-T) (77). Furthermore, daily NAM supplementation for 3 days enhanced CAR-T tumor-killing efficacy and boosted T cell-based immunotherapeutic efficacy in solid tumor models (77). Similarly, elevated CD38 levels impaired TIL immune responsiveness in metastatic cancer models (78), and CD38 depletion partially diminished NAD+ degradation and restores CD8+ T cell function. However, targeted disruption of CD38 perse was not sufficient to increase antitumor T cell therapy efficacy (79). Data on NAD+ manipulation for antiviral effects is less explored. Although, using murine hepatitis virus as a coronavirus model, the robust interferon response depressed cellular NAD+ in a manner that was opposed by supporting NAD+ status (80). More recently, in two murine models of SARS-CoV2-induced pneumonia, NAD+ and NMN supplementation for 3 days following inoculation reduced lung inflammatory infiltrates and improved survival, although the effects of NAD+-boosting on CTLs was not explored (81). The major roles of NAD+-boosting in the modulation of inflammation and autoimmunity in murine models is shown in Figure 1.
FIGURE 1.

Effects of NAD+-boosting in murine models of inflammaging, autoimmunity, cancer, kidney disease and viral infection. Strategies to boost NAD+ are shown on the left, although this review was restricted to the direct targeting of NAD+ metabolism and supplementation. The potential immunometabolic regulatory mechanisms are depicted in the box above the mouse image. To the right the different models are shown including how NAD+-boosting modulates immune responses.
Immune Effects of NAD+-Modulation in Human Health and Disease
The role of NR on the human immunity is evident where NR depresses inflammatory cytokines in older men (12), reduces the inflammasome (82) and blunts monocytic type I interferon signaling (13), diminishes cytokine production in PBMCs isolated from heart failure subjects (83), reduces systemic- and neuro-inflammation in Parkinson disease (11) and blunts TH1 and TH17 cell activation from healthy and psoriasis subjects (14). Although as in murine studies, contradictory data is also evident, which will be expanded upon below. A summary of these effects of NAD+ supplementation in human diseases and links to specific immune pathways is highlighted in Figure 2.
FIGURE 2.

The diseases explored using NAD+-boosting is shown in the outer wheel of the circle. The inner sections highlight effects of this supplementation on mitochondrial function and distinct immune pathways. The text delineated by the arrows emanating from NAD+ boosters show the approaches explored to uncover the effects of this metabolic intervention on immune function.
Mechanisms underpinning these effects have begun to be explored in primary human immune cells. In monocytes and macrophages, NR deacetylates and activates SIRT3, which in turn reduces mitochondrial ROS levels and NLRP3 activation (82). A subsequent study in murine macrophages showed that SIRT3 diminished mtDNA extrusion and blunted intracellular immunogenic triggers thereby dampening NLRP3 inflammasome assembly and activation (51). In healthy volunteers and in subjects with SLE, ex vivo NR similarly blunted monocytic type I interferon (13). This effect functioned via inosine signaling and blunting of autophagy, which in turn attenuated type 1 IFN signaling (13). Furthermmore, oral NR supplementation for 5 days to 12 weeks blunted the NLRP3 inflammasome, in patients with heart failure. This was due to enhancement of mitochondrial function and integrity with amelioration of immunogenic mtDNA extrusion (83, 84). An interesting hypothesis from these studies is that NAD+-boosting, by augmenting mitochondrial fidelity (85), may play a broader role in alleviating immune activation in response to aging, and in degenerative diseases (86). In the adaptive immune system, ex vivo NR, via arginine and fumarate biosynthesis activated anti-oxidant transcriptional regulation via NRF2 to blunt inflammation (14). Furthermore, in a phase 3 placebo-controlled double blinded study, oral nicotinamide supplementation for 12 months significantly reduced non-melanoma skin cancer recurrence in high-risk individuals (87). Although, effects on TIL function was not explored.
Finally, an interesting concept being explored is that activation of indoleamine 2,3-deoxygenase 1 (IDO1), an enzyme required for the degradation of tryptophan to kynurenine, within the tumor environment, leads to impaired effector T cell activity (88). The consequence of this, putatively via kynurenine metabolites, orchestrate immunosuppression and tumor immune evasion (89). The role of NAD+ biology in this context does not appear to have been well characterized and early IDO1 inhibitor therapy have not been shown to augment tumor immunotherapy (90). Nevertheless, the further evaluation of IDO1 in NAD+ biosynthesis and tumor immunomodulation warrant exploration on the role of NAD+ metabolism in immunoregulation.
Combining the findings of changes in both NAD+ production and consumption pathways in immunity implies that the balance of these processes may be crucial for immune responses and the progression of inflammatory diseases. Indeed, data shows that in SLE, whole blood NAD+ levels are elevated at lower disease activity and progressively fall with increasing disease activity (13). Furthermore, brain RNA-seq from patients with multiple sclerosis show that the NAD+ consuming enzyme encoding genes CD38 and PARP14, are significantly induced in demyelinating lesions (71), implicating increased NAD+ consumption in the disease pathophysiology. Subsequently, pharmacologic inhibition of CD38 in LPS and IFNγ stimulated primary human astrocytes, phenocopied the murine studies and showed that the inhibition of NAD+ hydrolysis in these cells, decreased chemokine signaling (72), supporting that astrocytic NAD+ biology may play an important role in human neuroinflammation. Furthermore, in a proof of concept study in two patients with life threatening SLE, Daratumumab, which targets CD38, reduced inflammatory signatures and the composite SLEDAI score, supporting that reduced NAD+ consumption may have systemic anti-inflammatory effects (91).
Emerging Concepts That Require Further Investigation
Although the current evidence supports important roles of NAD+-boosting in immunoregulation, many questions remain unanswered. Some of the major ones are highlighted here: (i) Are different supplements metabolized differently conferring distinct effects and/or tissue/cell targeted effects? (ii) What role do additional NAD+ metabolic intermediates such as nicotinic acid riboside play in immunity? (iii) How does intracellular and extracellular NAD+ intermediates and NAD+ compartmentalization effect immune cell modulation? (iv) Given that subcellular compartements have distinct NAD+ levels, and NAD+ consumption enzymes have variable Km values (92), a question arises as to which pathways, and in which compartments, NAD+-boosting may be operational? (v) Similarly, how does NAD+-boosting modulate distinct subcellular NAD+/NADH and NADP+/NADPH pools, and can we explore these effects by exploiting the emerging biosensors (93, 94) to characterize this dynamic biology? (vi) How does the interplay between NAD+ biosynthetic and consumptive pathways collectively regulate immune function? (vii) Given the emerging role of metabolic intermediates in signaling including succinate, itaconate, ketones inosine and arginine for example, begs the question whether other metabolites play regulatory roles in response to NAD+ modulation? (viii) In the same vain, could NAD+ biosynthesis intermediates such as kynurenic acid or quinolinic acid also be exploited to modulate immunoregulation? Finally, (ix) Does NAD+-boosting display immunomodulatory effects in the presence of canonical immunomodulatory therapies in inflammatory or autoimmune diseases? These questions require additional consideration for the future investigation. Furthermore, as the use of NAD+-boosting supplement is increasing in the population, longitudinal studies will need to be undertaken to evaluate whether these interventions have beneficial, neutral, or even possibly adverse longer-term effects on overall health.
Conclusions
The data reviewed here shows that innumerable components of NAD+ metabolic pathway orchestrate immune cell function. This complexity is further evident in the myriad of NAD+ biosynthesis and consumption pathways, including intracellular and extracellular components and functions. This is evident where depletion of NAD+ can prevent immune cell proliferation and differentiation, reduce viability, and blunt distinct immune cell processes such as phagocytosis, in parallel with NAD+-boosting blunting inflammation whilst at the same time increasing CTL activity. The importance of NAD+ hydrolysis and/or consumption in immune cell signaling is also emerging via generation of metabolic intermediates and through post-translational modifications. Meanwhile, mechanisms underlying beneficial effects of NAD+-boosting are being uncovered. These include the modulation of mitochondrial function and fidelity, augmentation of overall bioenergetic capacity, orchestration of immune signaling by distinct metabolic intermediates, epigenetic regulation, and/or posttranslational modifications in response to NAD+ consumption. Together these findings underscore the importance in our further understanding of NAD+ biology. An imperative of major importance, given that NAD+-boosting is an emerging field, in the immunomodulation of inflammatory, degenerative and oncogenic diseases.
Acknowledgements
We thank Rebecca D. Huffstutler CRNP, without whom we would not have been able to study the effects of nicotinamide riboside in human studies.
Funding:
NHLBI Division of Intramural Research to MNS (ZIA-HL005199)
Abbreviations in this article:
- AD
Alzheimer’s disease
- CD38
NAD+ glycohydrolase (NADase)
- cGAS
cyclic GMP-AMP synthase
- CTLs
cytotoxic T lymphocytes
- EAE
experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis
- IDO1
indoleamine 2,3-deoxygenase 1
- mtDNA
mitochondrial DNA
- NA
nicotinic acid
- NAM
nicotinamide
- NAAD
NA adenine dinucleotide
- NAMN
NA mononucleotide
- NAD+
Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide
- NAMPT
nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase
- NAR
nicotinic acid riboside
- NMN
nicotinamide mononucleotide
- NR
nicotinamide riboside
- PARP
poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase
- STING
stimulator of interferon genes
- SARM
sterile alpha and HEAT/Armadillo motif
- TCA
tricarboxylic acid cycle
- TLR
tumor infiltrating lymphocytes
- TLR
toll-like receptors
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest: Dr. Sack laboratory studies mechanisms of action of nicotinamide riboside (NR) on immunomodulation in human inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. His laboratory receives no direct financial support or compensation but does acquire NR and matching placebo from Chromadex Inc. through Cooperative and Development Research Agreements (CRADA) Material Transfer Agreements.
References:
- 1.Xiao W, Wang RS, Handy DE, and Loscalzo J. 2018. NAD(H) and NADP(H) Redox Couples and Cellular Energy Metabolism. Antioxidants & redox signaling 28: 251–272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chini CCS, Tarrago MG, and Chini EN. 2017. NAD and the aging process: Role in life, death and everything in between. Mol Cell Endocrinol 455: 62–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chini CCS, Zeidler JD, Kashyap S, Warner G, and Chini EN. 2021. Evolving concepts in NAD(+) metabolism. Cell Metab 33: 1076–1087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Titov DV, Cracan V, Goodman RP, Peng J, Grabarek Z, and Mootha VK. 2016. Complementation of mitochondrial electron transport chain by manipulation of the NAD+/NADH ratio. Science 352: 231–235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Stein LR, and Imai S. 2012. The dynamic regulation of NAD metabolism in mitochondria. Trends Endocrinol Metab 23: 420–428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Imai S, and Guarente L. 2014. NAD+ and sirtuins in aging and disease. Trends Cell Biol 24: 464–471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yaku K, Okabe K, and Nakagawa T. 2018. NAD metabolism: Implications in aging and longevity. Ageing Res Rev 47: 1–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sack MN 2018. Mitochondrial fidelity and metabolic agility control immune cell fate and function. J Clin Invest 128: 3651–3661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kemper C, and Sack MN. 2022. Linking nutrient sensing, mitochondrial function, and PRR immune cell signaling in liver disease. Trends Immunol 43: 886–900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hooftman A, Peace CG, Ryan DG, Day EA, Yang M, McGettrick AF, Yin M, Montano EN, Huo L, Toller-Kawahisa JE, Zecchini V, Ryan TAJ, Bolado-Carrancio A, Casey AM, Prag HA, Costa ASH, De Los Santos G, Ishimori M, Wallace DJ, Venuturupalli S, Nikitopoulou E, Frizzell N, Johansson C, Von Kriegsheim A, Murphy MP, Jefferies C, Frezza C, and O’Neill LAJ. 2023. Macrophage fumarate hydratase restrains mtRNA-mediated interferon production. Nature 615: 490–498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Brakedal B, Dolle C, Riemer F, Ma Y, Nido GS, Skeie GO, Craven AR, Schwarzlmuller T, Brekke N, Diab J, Sverkeli L, Skjeie V, Varhaug K, Tysnes OB, Peng S, Haugarvoll K, Ziegler M, Gruner R, Eidelberg D, and Tzoulis C. 2022. The NADPARK study: A randomized phase I trial of nicotinamide riboside supplementation in Parkinson’s disease. Cell Metab 34: 396–407 e396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Elhassan YS, Kluckova K, Fletcher RS, Schmidt MS, Garten A, Doig CL, Cartwright DM, Oakey L, Burley CV, Jenkinson N, Wilson M, Lucas SJE, Akerman I, Seabright A, Lai YC, Tennant DA, Nightingale P, Wallis GA, Manolopoulos KN, Brenner C, Philp A, and Lavery GG. 2019. Nicotinamide Riboside Augments the Aged Human Skeletal Muscle NAD(+) Metabolome and Induces Transcriptomic and Anti-inflammatory Signatures. Cell Rep 28: 1717–1728 e1716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wu J, Singh K, Lin A, Meadows AM, Wu K, Shing V, Bley M, Hassanzadeh S, Huffstutler RD, Schmidt MS, Blanco LP, Tian R, Brenner C, Pirooznia M, Kaplan MJ, and Sack MN. 2022. Boosting NAD+ blunts TLR4-induced type I IFN in control and systemic lupus erythematosus monocytes. J Clin Invest 132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Han K, Singh K, Meadows AM, Sharma R, Hassanzadeh S, Wu J, Goss-Holmes H, Huffstutler RD, Teague HL, Mehta NN, Griffin JL, Tian R, Traba J, and Sack MN. 2023. Boosting NAD preferentially blunts Th17 inflammation via arginine biosynthesis and redox control in healthy and psoriasis subjects. Cell Rep Med: 101157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, and Thompson CB. 2009. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 324: 1029–1033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yang L, Venneti S, and Nagrath D. 2017. Glutaminolysis: A Hallmark of Cancer Metabolism. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 19: 163–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang R, and Green DR. 2012. Metabolic checkpoints in activated T cells. Nat Immunol 13: 907–915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Berod L, Friedrich C, Nandan A, Freitag J, Hagemann S, Harmrolfs K, Sandouk A, Hesse C, Castro CN, Bahre H, Tschirner SK, Gorinski N, Gohmert M, Mayer CT, Huehn J, Ponimaskin E, Abraham WR, Muller R, Lochner M, and Sparwasser T. 2014. De novo fatty acid synthesis controls the fate between regulatory T and T helper 17 cells. Nat Med 20: 1327–1333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hochrein SM, Wu H, Eckstein M, Arrigoni L, Herman JS, Schumacher F, Gerecke C, Rosenfeldt M, Grun D, Kleuser B, Gasteiger G, Kastenmuller W, Ghesquiere B, Van den Bossche J, Abel ED, and Vaeth M. 2022. The glucose transporter GLUT3 controls T helper 17 cell responses through glycolytic-epigenetic reprogramming. Cell Metab 34: 516–532 e511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ryan DG, and O’Neill LAJ. 2020. Krebs Cycle Reborn in Macrophage Immunometabolism. Annu Rev Immunol 38: 289–313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Li Y, Zhang P, Wang C, Han C, Meng J, Liu X, Xu S, Li N, Wang Q, Shi X, and Cao X. 2013. Immune responsive gene 1 (IRG1) promotes endotoxin tolerance by increasing A20 expression in macrophages through reactive oxygen species. J Biol Chem 288: 16225–16234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lampropoulou V, Sergushichev A, Bambouskova M, Nair S, Vincent EE, Loginicheva E, Cervantes-Barragan L, Ma X, Huang SC, Griss T, Weinheimer CJ, Khader S, Randolph GJ, Pearce EJ, Jones RG, Diwan A, Diamond MS, and Artyomov MN. 2016. Itaconate Links Inhibition of Succinate Dehydrogenase with Macrophage Metabolic Remodeling and Regulation of Inflammation. Cell Metab 24: 158–166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhang Z, Chen C, Yang F, Zeng YX, Sun P, Liu P, and Li X. 2022. Itaconate is a lysosomal inducer that promotes antibacterial innate immunity. Mol Cell 82: 2844–2857 e2810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mills EL, Ryan DG, Prag HA, Dikovskaya D, Menon D, Zaslona Z, Jedrychowski MP, Costa ASH, Higgins M, Hams E, Szpyt J, Runtsch MC, King MS, McGouran JF, Fischer R, Kessler BM, McGettrick AF, Hughes MM, Carroll RG, Booty LM, Knatko EV, Meakin PJ, Ashford MLJ, Modis LK, Brunori G, Sevin DC, Fallon PG, Caldwell ST, Kunji ERS, Chouchani ET, Frezza C, Dinkova-Kostova AT, Hartley RC, Murphy MP, and O’Neill LA. 2018. Itaconate is an anti-inflammatory metabolite that activates Nrf2 via alkylation of KEAP1. Nature 556: 113–117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Makowski L, Chaib M, and Rathmell JC. 2020. Immunometabolism: From basic mechanisms to translation. Immunol Rev 295: 5–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Stromland O, Niere M, Nikiforov AA, VanLinden MR, Heiland I, and Ziegler M. 2019. Keeping the balance in NAD metabolism. Biochem Soc Trans 47: 119–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chellappa K, McReynolds MR, Lu W, Zeng X, Makarov M, Hayat F, Mukherjee S, Bhat YR, Lingala SR, Shima RT, Descamps HC, Cox T, Ji L, Jankowski C, Chu Q, Davidson SM, Thaiss CA, Migaud ME, Rabinowitz JD, and Baur JA. 2022. NAD precursors cycle between host tissues and the gut microbiome. Cell Metab 34: 1947–1959 e1945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nikiforov A, Dolle C, Niere M, and Ziegler M. 2011. Pathways and subcellular compartmentation of NAD biosynthesis in human cells: from entry of extracellular precursors to mitochondrial NAD generation. J Biol Chem 286: 21767–21778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cambronne XA, and Kraus WL. 2020. Location, Location, Location: Compartmentalization of NAD(+) Synthesis and Functions in Mammalian Cells. Trends Biochem Sci 45: 858–873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Girardi E, Agrimi G, Goldmann U, Fiume G, Lindinger S, Sedlyarov V, Srndic I, Gurtl B, Agerer B, Kartnig F, Scarcia P, Di Noia MA, Lineiro E, Rebsamen M, Wiedmer T, Bergthaler A, Palmieri L, and Superti-Furga G. 2020. Epistasis-driven identification of SLC25A51 as a regulator of human mitochondrial NAD import. Nat Commun 11: 6145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kory N, Uit de Bos J, van der Rijt S, Jankovic N, Gura M, Arp N, Pena IA, Prakash G, Chan SH, Kunchok T, Lewis CA, and Sabatini DM. 2020. MCART1/SLC25A51 is required for mitochondrial NAD transport. Sci Adv 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Luongo TS, Eller JM, Lu MJ, Niere M, Raith F, Perry C, Bornstein MR, Oliphint P, Wang L, McReynolds MR, Migaud ME, Rabinowitz JD, Johnson FB, Johnsson K, Ziegler M, Cambronne XA, and Baur JA. 2020. SLC25A51 is a mammalian mitochondrial NAD(+) transporter. Nature 588: 174–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Minhas PS, Liu L, Moon PK, Joshi AU, Dove C, Mhatre S, Contrepois K, Wang Q, Lee BA, Coronado M, Bernstein D, Snyder MP, Migaud M, Majeti R, Mochly-Rosen D, Rabinowitz JD, and Andreasson KI. 2019. Macrophage de novo NAD(+) synthesis specifies immune function in aging and inflammation. Nat Immunol 20: 50–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Xue C, Li G, Zheng Q, Gu X, Shi Q, Su Y, Chu Q, Yuan X, Bao Z, Lu J, and Li L. 2023. Tryptophan metabolism in health and disease. Cell Metab 35: 1304–1326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Liu J, Zhao YJ, Li WH, Hou YN, Li T, Zhao ZY, Fang C, Li SL, and Lee HC. 2017. Cytosolic interaction of type III human CD38 with CIB1 modulates cellular cyclic ADP-ribose levels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114: 8283–8288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Camponeschi A, Klasener K, Sundell T, Lundqvist C, Manna PT, Ayoubzadeh N, Sundqvist M, Thorarinsdottir K, Gatto M, Visentini M, Onnheim K, Aranburu A, Forsman H, Ekwall O, Fogelstrand L, Gjertsson I, Reth M, and Martensson IL. 2022. Human CD38 regulates B cell antigen receptor dynamic organization in normal and malignant B cells. J Exp Med 219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chini CCS, Peclat TR, Warner GM, Kashyap S, Espindola-Netto JM, de Oliveira GC, Gomez LS, Hogan KA, Tarrago MG, Puranik AS, Agorrody G, Thompson KL, Dang K, Clarke S, Childs BG, Kanamori KS, Witte MA, Vidal P, Kirkland AL, De Cecco M, Chellappa K, McReynolds MR, Jankowski C, Tchkonia T, Kirkland JL, Sedivy JM, van Deursen JM, Baker DJ, van Schooten W, Rabinowitz JD, Baur JA, and Chini EN. 2020. CD38 ecto-enzyme in immune cells is induced during aging and regulates NAD(+) and NMN levels. Nat Metab 2: 1284–1304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Pavon EJ, Zumaquero E, Rosal-Vela A, Khoo KM, Cerezo-Wallis D, Garcia-Rodriguez S, Carrascal M, Abian J, Graeff R, Callejas-Rubio JL, Ortego-Centeno N, Malavasi F, Zubiaur M, and Sancho J. 2013. Increased CD38 expression in T cells and circulating anti-CD38 IgG autoantibodies differentially correlate with distinct cytokine profiles and disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Cytokine 62: 232–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Katsuyama E, Suarez-Fueyo A, Bradley SJ, Mizui M, Marin AV, Mulki L, Krishfield S, Malavasi F, Yoon J, Sui SJH, Kyttaris VC, and Tsokos GC. 2020. The CD38/NAD/SIRTUIN1/EZH2 Axis Mitigates Cytotoxic CD8 T Cell Function and Identifies Patients with SLE Prone to Infections. Cell Rep 30: 112–123 e114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Covarrubias AJ, Kale A, Perrone R, Lopez-Dominguez JA, Pisco AO, Kasler HG, Schmidt MS, Heckenbach I, Kwok R, Wiley CD, Wong HS, Gibbs E, Iyer SS, Basisty N, Wu Q, Kim IJ, Silva E, Vitangcol K, Shin KO, Lee YM, Riley R, Ben-Sahra I, Ott M, Schilling B, Scheibye-Knudsen M, Ishihara K, Quake SR, Newman J, Brenner C, Campisi J, and Verdin E. 2020. Senescent cells promote tissue NAD(+) decline during ageing via the activation of CD38(+) macrophages. Nat Metab 2: 1265–1283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Carty M, and Bowie AG. 2019. SARM: From immune regulator to cell executioner. Biochem Pharmacol 161: 52–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gerdts J, Brace EJ, Sasaki Y, DiAntonio A, and Milbrandt J. 2015. SARM1 activation triggers axon degeneration locally via NAD(+) destruction. Science 348: 453–457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Fehr AR, Singh SA, Kerr CM, Mukai S, Higashi H, and Aikawa M. 2020. The impact of PARPs and ADP-ribosylation on inflammation and host-pathogen interactions. Genes Dev 34: 341–359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bohio AA, Sattout A, Wang R, Wang K, Sah RK, Guo X, Zeng X, Ke Y, Boldogh I, and Ba X. 2019. c-Abl-Mediated Tyrosine Phosphorylation of PARP1 Is Crucial for Expression of Proinflammatory Genes. J Immunol 203: 1521–1531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Iwata H, Goettsch C, Sharma A, Ricchiuto P, Goh WW, Halu A, Yamada I, Yoshida H, Hara T, Wei M, Inoue N, Fukuda D, Mojcher A, Mattson PC, Barabasi AL, Boothby M, Aikawa E, Singh SA, and Aikawa M. 2016. PARP9 and PARP14 cross-regulate macrophage activation via STAT1 ADP-ribosylation. Nat Commun 7: 12849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Galindo-Campos MA, Bedora-Faure M, Farres J, Lescale C, Moreno-Lama L, Martinez C, Martin-Caballero J, Ampurdanes C, Aparicio P, Dantzer F, Cerutti A, Deriano L, and Yelamos J. 2019. Coordinated signals from the DNA repair enzymes PARP-1 and PARP-2 promotes B-cell development and function. Cell Death Differ 26: 2667–2681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sack MN, and Finkel T. 2012. Mitochondrial metabolism, sirtuins, and aging. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wang F, Wang K, Xu W, Zhao S, Ye D, Wang Y, Xu Y, Zhou L, Chu Y, Zhang C, Qin X, Yang P, and Yu H. 2017. SIRT5 Desuccinylates and Activates Pyruvate Kinase M2 to Block Macrophage IL-1beta Production and to Prevent DSS-Induced Colitis in Mice. Cell Rep 19: 2331–2344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gamez-Garcia A, and Vazquez BN. 2021. Nuclear Sirtuins and the Aging of the Immune System. Genes (Basel) 12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tannahill GM, Curtis AM, Adamik J, Palsson-McDermott EM, McGettrick AF, Goel G, Frezza C, Bernard NJ, Kelly B, Foley NH, Zheng L, Gardet A, Tong Z, Jany SS, Corr SC, Haneklaus M, Caffrey BE, Pierce K, Walmsley S, Beasley FC, Cummins E, Nizet V, Whyte M, Taylor CT, Lin H, Masters SL, Gottlieb E, Kelly VP, Clish C, Auron PE, Xavier RJ, and O’Neill LA. 2013. Succinate is an inflammatory signal that induces IL-1beta through HIF-1alpha. Nature 496: 238–242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Traba J, Geiger SS, Kwarteng Siaw M, Han K, Ra OH, Siegel RM, Gius D, and Sack MN. 2017. Prolonged fasting suppresses mitochondrial NLRP3 inflammasome assembly and activation via SIRT3 mediated activation of Superoxide Dismutase 2. J Biol Chem 292: 12153–12164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kong S, Kim SJ, Sandal B, Lee SM, Gao B, Zhang DD, and Fang D. 2011. The type III histone deacetylase Sirt1 protein suppresses p300-mediated histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation at Bclaf1 promoter to inhibit T cell activation. J Biol Chem 286: 16967–16975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zhang J, Lee SM, Shannon S, Gao B, Chen W, Chen A, Divekar R, McBurney MW, Braley-Mullen H, Zaghouani H, and Fang D. 2009. The type III histone deacetylase Sirt1 is essential for maintenance of T cell tolerance in mice. J Clin Invest 119: 3048–3058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Warren JL, and MacIver NJ. 2019. Regulation of Adaptive Immune Cells by Sirtuins. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 10: 466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Micheli V, Simmonds HA, Sestini S, and Ricci C. 1990. Importance of nicotinamide as an NAD precursor in the human erythrocyte. Arch Biochem Biophys 283: 40–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Yoshino J, Mills KF, Yoon MJ, and Imai S. 2011. Nicotinamide mononucleotide, a key NAD(+) intermediate, treats the pathophysiology of diet- and age-induced diabetes in mice. Cell Metab 14: 528–536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Yoshino M, Yoshino J, Kayser BD, Patti GJ, Franczyk MP, Mills KF, Sindelar M, Pietka T, Patterson BW, Imai SI, and Klein S. 2021. Nicotinamide mononucleotide increases muscle insulin sensitivity in prediabetic women. Science 372: 1224–1229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Trammell SA, Schmidt MS, Weidemann BJ, Redpath P, Jaksch F, Dellinger RW, Li Z, Abel ED, Migaud ME, and Brenner C. 2016. Nicotinamide riboside is uniquely and orally bioavailable in mice and humans. Nat Commun 7: 12948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Tullius SG, Biefer HR, Li S, Trachtenberg AJ, Edtinger K, Quante M, Krenzien F, Uehara H, Yang X, Kissick HT, Kuo WP, Ghiran I, de la Fuente MA, Arredouani MS, Camacho V, Tigges JC, Toxavidis V, El Fatimy R, Smith BD, Vasudevan A, and ElKhal A. 2014. NAD+ protects against EAE by regulating CD4+ T-cell differentiation. Nat Commun 5: 5101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Subbannayya Y, Haug M, Pinto SM, Mohanty V, Meas HZ, Flo TH, Prasad TSK, and Kandasamy RK. 2020. The Proteomic Landscape of Resting and Activated CD4+ T Cells Reveal Insights into Cell Differentiation and Function. Int J Mol Sci 22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Halvorsen B, Espeland MZ, Andersen GO, Yndestad A, Sagen EL, Rashidi A, Knudsen EC, Skjelland M, Skagen KR, Krohg-Sorensen K, Holm S, Ritschel V, Holven KB, Biessen EA, Aukrust P, and Dahl TB. 2015. Increased expression of NAMPT in PBMC from patients with acute coronary syndrome and in inflammatory M1 macrophages. Atherosclerosis 243: 204–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Yang K, Lauritzen KH, Olsen MB, Dahl TB, Ranheim T, Ahmed MS, Attramadal H, Aukrust P, Halvorsen B, Nyman TA, Sandanger O, and Yndestad A. 2019. Low Cellular NAD(+) Compromises Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Inflammatory Responses via Inhibiting TLR4 Signal Transduction in Human Monocytes. J Immunol 203: 1598–1608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Mills KF, Yoshida S, Stein LR, Grozio A, Kubota S, Sasaki Y, Redpath P, Migaud ME, Apte RS, Uchida K, Yoshino J, and Imai SI. 2016. Long-Term Administration of Nicotinamide Mononucleotide Mitigates Age-Associated Physiological Decline in Mice. Cell Metab 24: 795–806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Hou Y, Lautrup S, Cordonnier S, Wang Y, Croteau DL, Zavala E, Zhang Y, Moritoh K, O’Connell JF, Baptiste BA, Stevnsner TV, Mattson MP, and Bohr VA. 2018. NAD(+) supplementation normalizes key Alzheimer’s features and DNA damage responses in a new AD mouse model with introduced DNA repair deficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115: E1876–E1885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Hou Y, Wei Y, Lautrup S, Yang B, Wang Y, Cordonnier S, Mattson MP, Croteau DL, and Bohr VA. 2021. NAD(+) supplementation reduces neuroinflammation and cell senescence in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease via cGAS-STING. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Doke T, Mukherjee S, Mukhi D, Dhillon P, Abedini A, Davis JG, Chellappa K, Chen B, Baur JA, and Susztak K. 2023. NAD(+) precursor supplementation prevents mtRNA/RIG-I-dependent inflammation during kidney injury. Nat Metab 5: 414–430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kaneko S, Wang J, Kaneko M, Yiu G, Hurrell JM, Chitnis T, Khoury SJ, and He Z. 2006. Protecting axonal degeneration by increasing nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide levels in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis models. J Neurosci 26: 9794–9804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Wang J, Zhao C, Kong P, Sun H, Sun Z, Bian G, Sun Y, and Guo L. 2016. Treatment with NAD(+) inhibited experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by activating AMPK/SIRT1 signaling pathway and modulating Th1/Th17 immune responses in mice. Int Immunopharmacol 39: 287–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Wang JL, Li B, Tan GJ, Gai XL, Xing JN, Wang JQ, Quan MY, Zhang N, and Guo L. 2020. NAD+ attenuates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis through induction of CD11b+ gr-1+ myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Biosci Rep 40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wang X, Li B, Liu L, Zhang L, Ma T, and Guo L. 2021. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide treatment alleviates the symptoms of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by activating autophagy and inhibiting the NLRP3 inflammasome. Int Immunopharmacol 90: 107092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Langley MR, Choi CI, Peclat TR, Guo Y, Simon WL, Yoon H, Kleppe L, Lucchinetti CF, Chini CCS, Chini EN, and Scarisbrick IA. 2021. Critical Role of Astrocyte NAD(+) Glycohydrolase in Myelin Injury and Regeneration. J Neurosci 41: 8644–8667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Meyer T, Shimon D, Youssef S, Yankovitz G, Tessler A, Chernobylsky T, Gaoni-Yogev A, Perelroizen R, Budick-Harmelin N, Steinman L, and Mayo L. 2022. NAD(+) metabolism drives astrocyte proinflammatory reprogramming in central nervous system autoimmunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 119: e2211310119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Bruzzone S, Fruscione F, Morando S, Ferrando T, Poggi A, Garuti A, D’Urso A, Selmo M, Benvenuto F, Cea M, Zoppoli G, Moran E, Soncini D, Ballestrero A, Sordat B, Patrone F, Mostoslavsky R, Uccelli A, and Nencioni A. 2009. Catastrophic NAD+ depletion in activated T lymphocytes through Nampt inhibition reduces demyelination and disability in EAE. PLoS One 4: e7897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.van Wageningen TA, Gerrits E, Brouwer N, Breve JJP, Geurts JJG, Eggen BJL, Boddeke H, and van Dam AM. 2022. Distinct gene expression in demyelinated white and grey matter areas of patients with multiple sclerosis. Brain Commun 4: fcac005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Yu YR, Imrichova H, Wang H, Chao T, Xiao Z, Gao M, Rincon-Restrepo M, Franco F, Genolet R, Cheng WC, Jandus C, Coukos G, Jiang YF, Locasale JW, Zippelius A, Liu PS, Tang L, Bock C, Vannini N, and Ho PC. 2020. Disturbed mitochondrial dynamics in CD8(+) TILs reinforce T cell exhaustion. Nat Immunol 21: 1540–1551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Schurich A, Pallett LJ, Jajbhay D, Wijngaarden J, Otano I, Gill US, Hansi N, Kennedy PT, Nastouli E, Gilson R, Frezza C, Henson SM, and Maini MK. 2016. Distinct Metabolic Requirements of Exhausted and Functional Virus-Specific CD8 T Cells in the Same Host. Cell Rep 16: 1243–1252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Wang Y, Wang F, Wang L, Qiu S, Yao Y, Yan C, Xiong X, Chen X, Ji Q, Cao J, Gao G, Li D, Zhang L, Guo Z, Wang R, Wang H, and Fan G. 2021. NAD(+) supplement potentiates tumor-killing function by rescuing defective TUB-mediated NAMPT transcription in tumor-infiltrated T cells. Cell Rep 36: 109516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Zhang Y, Li W, Ma K, Zhai J, Jin Y, Zhang L, and Chen C. 2022. Elevated CD38 expression characterizes impaired CD8(+) T cell immune response in metastatic pleural effusions. Immunol Lett 245: 61–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Ma K, Sun L, Shen M, Zhang X, Xiao Z, Wang J, Liu X, Jiang K, Xiao-Feng Qin F, Guo F, Zhang B, and Zhang L. 2022. Functional assessment of the cell-autonomous role of NADase CD38 in regulating CD8(+) T cell exhaustion. iScience 25: 104347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Heer CD, Sanderson DJ, Voth LS, Alhammad YMO, Schmidt MS, Trammell SAJ, Perlman S, Cohen MS, Fehr AR, and Brenner C. 2020. Coronavirus infection and PARP expression dysregulate the NAD metabolome: An actionable component of innate immunity. J Biol Chem 295: 17986–17996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Jiang Y, Deng Y, Pang H, Ma T, Ye Q, Chen Q, Chen H, Hu Z, Qin CF, and Xu Z. 2022. Treatment of SARS-CoV-2-induced pneumonia with NAD(+) and NMN in two mouse models. Cell Discov 8: 38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Traba J, Kwarteng-Siaw M, Okoli TC, Li J, Huffstutler RD, Bray A, Waclawiw MA, Han K, Pelletier M, Sauve AA, Siegel RM, and Sack MN. 2015. Fasting and refeeding differentially regulate NLRP3 inflammasome activation in human subjects. J Clin Invest 125: 4592–4600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Zhou B, Wang DD, Qiu Y, Airhart S, Liu Y, Stempien-Otero A, O’Brien KD, and Tian R. 2020. Boosting NAD level suppresses inflammatory activation of PBMCs in heart failure. J Clin Invest 130: 6054–6063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Wang DD, Airhart SE, Zhou B, Shireman LM, Jiang S, Melendez Rodriguez C, Kirkpatrick JN, Shen DD, Tian R, and O’Brien KD. 2022. Safety and Tolerability of Nicotinamide Riboside in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction. JACC Basic Transl Sci 7: 1183–1196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Lapatto HAK, Kuusela M, Heikkinen A, Muniandy M, van der Kolk BW, Gopalakrishnan S, Pollanen N, Sandvik M, Schmidt MS, Heinonen S, Saari S, Kuula J, Hakkarainen A, Tampio J, Saarinen T, Taskinen MR, Lundbom N, Groop PH, Tiirola M, Katajisto P, Lehtonen M, Brenner C, Kaprio J, Pekkala S, Ollikainen M, Pietilainen KH, and Pirinen E. 2023. Nicotinamide riboside improves muscle mitochondrial biogenesis, satellite cell differentiation, and gut microbiota in a twin study. Sci Adv 9: eadd5163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Sack MN 2022. Tackling Inflammation at its Source in Heart Failure: Are Mitochondria the Key? JACC Basic Transl Sci 7: 1197–1199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Chen AC, Martin AJ, Choy B, Fernandez-Penas P, Dalziell RA, McKenzie CA, Scolyer RA, Dhillon HM, Vardy JL, Kricker A, St George G, Chinniah N, Halliday GM, and Damian DL. 2015. A Phase 3 Randomized Trial of Nicotinamide for Skin-Cancer Chemoprevention. N Engl J Med 373: 1618–1626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Merlo LMF, DuHadaway JB, Montgomery JD, Peng WD, Murray PJ, Prendergast GC, Caton AJ, Muller AJ, and Mandik-Nayak L. 2020. Differential Roles of IDO1 and IDO2 in T and B Cell Inflammatory Immune Responses. Front Immunol 11: 1861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Zhai L, Ladomersky E, Lenzen A, Nguyen B, Patel R, Lauing KL, Wu M, and Wainwright DA. 2018. IDO1 in cancer: a Gemini of immune checkpoints. Cell Mol Immunol 15: 447–457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Tang K, Wu YH, Song Y, and Yu B. 2021. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) inhibitors in clinical trials for cancer immunotherapy. J Hematol Oncol 14: 68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Ostendorf L, Burns M, Durek P, Heinz GA, Heinrich F, Garantziotis P, Enghard P, Richter U, Biesen R, Schneider U, Knebel F, Burmester G, Radbruch A, Mei HE, Mashreghi MF, Hiepe F, and Alexander T. 2020. Targeting CD38 with Daratumumab in Refractory Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. N Engl J Med 383: 1149–1155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Canto C, Menzies KJ, and Auwerx J. 2015. NAD(+) Metabolism and the Control of Energy Homeostasis: A Balancing Act between Mitochondria and the Nucleus. Cell Metab 22: 31–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Hu Q, Wu D, Walker M, Wang P, Tian R, and Wang W. 2021. Genetically encoded biosensors for evaluating NAD(+)/NADH ratio in cytosolic and mitochondrial compartments. Cell Rep Methods 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Roshanzadeh A, Kang H, You SH, Park J, Khoa ND, Lee DH, Kim GJ, and Kim ES. 2019. Real-time monitoring of NADPH levels in living mammalian cells using fluorescence-enhancing protein bound to NADPHs. Biosens Bioelectron 146: 111753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
