Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 16;28(6):772–783. doi: 10.5603/rpor.98734

Table 4.

Planning target volume (PTV) averaged parameters (mean ± SD), evaluation indices, integral dose, treatment time and comparison p-values

Parameter VMAT HT p-value
Length [cm] 54.29 ± 9.79
Volume [cm3] 1714.26 ± 801.44
Dmean [cGy] 843.23 ± 9.58 831.86 ± 9.51 0.004
D2% [cGy] 889.30 ± 18.00 854.10 ± 16.21 0.000
D95% [cGy] 800.50 ± 14.26 801.29 ± 1.85 0.297
D98% [cGy] 786.23 ± 11.45 785.05 ± 6.97 0.668
V100 (%) 95.57 ± 2.17 95.05 ± 0.47 0.170
V107 (%) 23.83 ± 12.13 6.48 ± 5.63 0.000
CI 1.34 ± 0.10 1.22 ± 0.08 0.001
HI 0.13 ± 0.04 0.09 ± 0.05 0.001
CN 0.71 ± 0.05 0.78 ± 0.05 0.001
GI 4.35 ± 0.73 4.62 ± 1.11 0.181
ID [cGy] 334.83 ± 55.09 356.56 ± 53.38 0.148
ID(NTT) [cGy] 282.10 ± 40.42 318 ± 38.49 0.043

CI — conformity index; HI — homogeneity index; CN — conformation number; GI — gradient index; ID — integral doses; ID(NTT) — integral doses to non-tumor tissue