Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 26;78(3):702–710. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad656

Table 1.

Demographics of Study Infants

Demographic Pharmacokinetics and Safety Population
Control Arm (n = 6) Rifampicin Arm (n = 21)
Male/Female 3/3 13/8
Weight, kga 6.0 (5.8 to 8.0) 6.4 (5.2 to 7.1)
Weight-band, kg
 3–<6 3 (50%) 11 (52%)
 6–<10 3 (50%) 10 (48%)
Length, cma 64.5 (60.8 to 66.3) 62.0 (58.5 to 67.0)
Age, moa 7.4 (6.4 to 8.9) 6.6 (5.6 to 10.5)
Weight-for-height z scorea −0.8 (−2.1 to 0.5) −0.7 (−1.7 to 0.5)
Weight-for-age z scorea −2.4 (−3.0 to -0.5) −2.5 (−4.4 to −0.9)
Baseline viral load, log10 copies/mLa 5.6 (4.0 to 6.6) 6.0 (5.6 to 6.8)
Treatment naive upon enrollment in the main trial 5 (83%) 19 (90%)
Dolutegravir dose mg/kg/24 ha,b 1.86 (1.09 to 2.36) 2.66 (2.00 to 4.16)
Confirmed tuberculosis diagnosisc
 Yes 0 (0%) 6 (29%)
 No 6 (100%) 15 (71%)

Demographic data represent the infant on the day of their pharmacokinetic visit unless specified otherwise.

aReported median (interquartile range).

bInfants in the rifampicin arm received dolutegravir twice daily and hence received a 2-times higher mg/kg/24 hour dose compared with the control arm using dolutegravir once daily.

cDiagnosed using GeneXpert and/or tuberculosis urine lipoarabinomannan.