Local ablation |
RFA is the first treatment approach for very early stage HCC (without vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread, with preserved liver function and PS 0) that is not feasible to LT
RFA is preferred over surgery for solitary HCC ≤3 cm without high‐risk locations for ablation
RFA can be used for multifocal HCC within Milan criteria (≤3 nodules, each ≤3 cm) with contraindications to LT
MWA is potentially the best option for HCC <4 cm due to achieve more extensive tumour necrosis than RFA
PEI can be adopted in some patients with technical or safety concerns.
|
Suitable for CNLC Ia and a proportion of Ib HCC (i.e., solitary tumours with a diameter of ≤5 cm or 2–3 tumours with a maximum diameter ≤3 cm)
First‐line treatment for unresectable early stage HCC
TACE combined with ablation can be used for inoperable solitary or multiple tumours with a diameter of 3–7 cm
Selection of MWA or RFA based on the size and position of tumours, and the operator's experience due to similar efficacy
|
Choice of ablative therapy for early stage HCC should be based on tumour size and location, underlying liver function, as well as available local radiologist expertise and experience
Ablative treatments are most effective for tumours <3 cm in an appropriate location away from other organs and major vessels/bile ducts, with the best outcomes in tumours <2 cm
MWA is an alternative to RFA for small or unresectable HCC
|
TACE |
First‐line treatment option for the intermediate stage that defined as multifocal HCC (exceeding early stage) with preserved liver function, no cancer‐related symptoms (PS 0), and no vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread
Disease with early stage not feasible or failure to curative therapy according to treatment stage migration
Selection of DEB‐TACE and cTACE according to clinical preference due to the similar overall efficacy
Disease without the option of liver transplant but who have preserved portal flow and defined tumour burden
|
IIb, IIIa, and a proportion of IIIb HCC, Child‐Pugh A/B, and a PS score of 0–2
Patients with resectable HCC (Ib/IIa stage) are unable or unwilling to receive surgery
Postoperative adjuvant TACE for patients at high recurrence risk
Downstaging/bridging therapy before curative surgery
DEB‐TACE shared indications with cTACE;
TACE‐based combinations are advocated for better outcomes
|
Unresectable or inoperable tumours not amenable to ablation therapy only, and the absence of large‐volume extrahepatic disease
All tumours irrespective of location may be amenable to arterially directed therapies provided that the arterial blood supply to the tumour may be isolated without excessive non‐target treatment
Evaluation of the arterial anatomy of the liver, patient's performance status, and liver function is necessary before the initiation of arterially directed therapy
|
HAIC |
|
Treatment option for TACE failure/refractoriness based on liver function
Disease with major portal vascular invasion, intrahepatic multinodular lesions, and Child‐Pugh B liver function
|
|
TARE |
|
|
As part of arterially directed therapies, sharing major indications with TACE
Maybe appropriate in selective patients with advanced HCC, specifically segmental or lobar portal vein, rather than main portal vein thrombosis
|