表 5.
本研究所提出的方法与单期相单分类器结果比较
Comparison of the results by the proposed method and those of models with a single phase and a single classifier
| Phase | Strategy | AUC | ACC | SEN | SPE | |
| KNN: k-nearest neighbour; SVM: Support vector machines; MLP: Multilayer perceptron; LR: Logistic regression; LDA: Linear discriminant analysis; GNB: Gaussian bayes; DT: Decision tree. | ||||||
| EAP | Worst | SPEC+GNB | 0.601 | 0.586 | 0.708 | 0.464 |
| Best | JMI+SVM | 0.687 | 0.711 | 0.770 | 0.647 | |
| Decision Fusion | 0.703 | 0.685 | 0.773 | 0.595 | ||
| LAP | Worst | fisher_score+DT | 0.616 | 0.612 | 0.618 | 0.615 |
| Best | lap_score+KNN | 0.690 | 0.695 | 0.792 | 0.596 | |
| Decision Fusion | 0.778 | 0.703 | 0.808 | 0.595 | ||
| PVP | Worst | SPEC+LDA | 0.631 | 0.673 | 0.668 | 0.595 |
| Best | RFS+MLP | 0.707 | 0.711 | 0.774 | 0.644 | |
| Decision Fusion | 0.773 | 0.711 | 0.789 | 0.631 | ||
| EP | Worst | CMIM+DT | 0.612 | 0.612 | 0.630 | 0.593 |
| Best | MIFS+KNN | 0.729 | 0.684 | 0.823 | 0.536 | |
| Decision Fusion | 0.773 | 0.730 | 0.788 | 0.667 | ||
| The proposed method | 0.828 | 0.766 | 0.877 | 0.648 | ||