Table 3.
Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis (Modified Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network—Checklist)
| Item | Yes/noa | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Research question clearly defined, and eligibility criteria listed. | |
| 2 | Comprehensive literature search conducted. | |
| 3 | At least two people selected studies. | |
| 4 | At least two people extracted data. | |
| 5 | Status of publication not used as an inclusion criterion. | |
| 6 | Excluded studies listed. | |
| 7 | Relevant characteristics of included studies provided. | |
| 8 | Quality of included studies assessed and reported. | |
| 9 | At least two people assessed quality of included studies. | |
| 10 | Appropriate methods used to combine individual study results. | |
| 11 | Likelihood of publication bias assessed appropriately. | |
| 12 | Conflicts of interest declared. | |
| Total scoreb |
Rating: “Yes” = 1; “No” or unable to tell from the article = 0.
Scoring—sum of items as follows: 10–12 = high quality, low risk of bias; 6–9 = acceptable quality, moderate risk of bias; <6 = low quality, high risk of bias.