Table 4.
Randomized Controlled Trial (Modified SIGN Checklist)
| Item | Yes/noa | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Addressed an appropriate and clearly focused question. | |
| 2 | Group assignment randomized. | |
| 3 | Sample size justified by a power calculation. | |
| 4 | Investigators blinded to patients' group assignment. | |
| 5 | Patients blinded to group assignment. | |
| 6 | Groups were similar at the start of the trial. | |
| 7 | Only difference between groups was treatment of interest. | |
| 8 | Outcomes measured in a standard, valid, and reliable way. | |
| 9 | Power calculation was used and required sample size attained. | |
| 10 | Intention-to-treat analysis performed. | |
| Total scoreb |
Rating: “Yes” = 1; “No” or unable to tell from the article = 0.
Items scored as follows: 9–10 = high quality, low risk of bias; 6–8 = acceptable quality, moderate risk of bias; <6 = low quality, high risk of bias.