Skip to main content
Health Science Reports logoLink to Health Science Reports
. 2024 Mar 20;7(3):e1978. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1978

What medical conditions lead to a request for euthanasia? A rapid scoping review

Zahra Rahimian 1,2, Leila Rahimian 3, Jorge Lopez‐Castroman 4,5, Jeyran Ostovarfar 2, Mohammad J Fallahi 6, Mohammad A Nayeri 1,2, Hossein M Vardanjani 7,
PMCID: PMC10955044  PMID: 38515545

Abstract

Background and Aims

Euthanasia is a controversial issue related to the right to die. Although euthanasia is mostly requested by terminally sick individuals, even in societies where it is legal, it is unclear what medical conditions lead to euthanasia requests. In this scoping review, we aimed to compile medical conditions for which euthanasia has been requested or performed around the world.

Methods

The review was preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analysis for scoping reviews (PRISMA‐ScR) checklist. Retrieved search results were screened and unrelated documents were excluded. Data on reasons for conducting or requesting euthanasia along with the study type, setting, and publication year were extracted from documents. Human development index and euthanasia legality were also extracted. Major medical fields were used to categorize reported reasons. Group discussions were conducted if needed for this categorization. An electronic search was undertaken in MEDLINE through PubMed for published documents covering the years January 2000 to September 2022.

Results

Out of 3323 records, a total of 197 papers were included. The most common medical conditions in euthanasia requests are cancer in a terminal phase (45.4%), Alzheimer's disease and dementia (19.8%), constant unbearable physical or mental suffering (19.8%), treatment‐resistant mood disorders (12.2%), and advanced cardiovascular disorders (12.2%).

Conclusion

Reasons for euthanasia are mostly linked to chronic or terminal physical conditions. Psychiatric disorders also lead to a substantial proportion of euthanasia requests. This review can help to identify the features shared by conditions that lead to performing or requesting euthanasia

Keywords: assisted suicide (AS), bioethics, euthanasia, mercy killing, right to die


What is already known about the topic?

  • Euthanasia is a challenging issue that has sparked numerous controversies around the world over the past decades.

  • There is no consensus about the criteria or guidelines that have been set for identifying a patient eligible for euthanasia in different countries.

What this paper adds?

  • To our knowledge, this is the first scoping review to systematically list and categorize published records of euthanasia requests around the world into five broad groups.

  • We provide a picture of all euthanasia requests' frequencies in each broad group.

  • This study facilitates informing scientists and researchers about the trends of euthanasia requests during different years and in different countries around the world.

How this study might affect research, practice, or policy?

  • This review can provide information to help clinicians and health policymakers to reach a more precise decision about the acceptance or the rejection of requests made by patients.

  • This review informs readers about all medical conditions that increase the likelihood of requesting euthanasia. Researchers should consider these conditions and conduct further research on each condition in detail.

1. INTRODUCTION

Euthanasia is a challenging issue that has sparked numerous controversies around the world over the past couple of decades. 1 Globally, about 200 million people have access to euthanasia and other forms of assisted dying. 2 Euthanasia is legal in some countries, such as the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Colombia, Canada, some states in the United States, Spain, Australia, and New Zealand. 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 Also, new legislation is being crafted in some countries such as Portugal. 7 The literal meaning of euthanasia is good death or easy death 8 , 9 and it has been defined as “the termination of the life of the terminally ill patients at their request”. 10 According to this definition, euthanasia should only be received by patients who suffer from end‐stage diseases, but in a few countries, such as Belgium, Netherlands, and Canada people may also request euthanasia even though they are not terminally ill. 11 , 12 , 13

Some countries, such as Denmark, France, or Sweden, report relatively high public acceptance of euthanasia; however, it is not possible there to undergo euthanasia. On the contrary, in most European countries, the acceptance is low to moderate. 14 Opponents of euthanasia argue that it violates medical ethics and physicians’ responsibilities. 15 , 16 Proponents claim that euthanasia is a form of palliative care that respects the autonomy of terminally ill patients and allows them to die peacefully. 17 , 18 , 19

Two types of euthanasia can be differentiated. Active euthanasia consists of deliberately administrating a life‐ending substance or procedure. 20 Conversely, in a type of euthanasia which is not active, a person's life is intentionally ended by withholding life‐sustaining treatment. 20 , 21 The public acceptance of these two types varies largely. 22 , 23

Various physical and mental conditions can increase the likelihood of requesting euthanasia among patients. 24 , 25 Contrary to the increasing number of euthanasia requests around the world, no consensus about criteria for recognizing conditions in which patients can request euthanasia as palliative care has been reached around the world. Informing about all medical conditions that increase the likelihood of requesting euthanasia can help health policymakers as well as clinicians to reach a more precise decision about the acceptance or the rejection of requests made by patients when face by such requests. In this study, we searched all medical conditions that make patients request euthanasia through an examination of scientific literature.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature review was conducted to see whether there is any reason for any type of euthanasia to be requested regardless of whether the euthanasia request was accepted or not. This review was done according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analysis for scoping reviews (PRISMA‐ScR) checklist. 26

In this scoping review, the population comprised all patients who requested euthanasia according to published studies. The concept is made by medical conditions underlying euthanasia requests, and the context was delimited by countries with published data on euthanasia requests.

2.1. Search strategy

After conducting a preliminary trial, search terms were defined through consensus. Only published studies were considered. The search strategy was set to be very broad and sensitive as follows: ((euthanasia[Title]) OR (assisted suicide[Title])) OR (medical assistance in dying[Title]). As euthanasia has become a reality in recent years, documents with a publication date of January 1, 2000 onwards were searched. The initial search was conducted on July 30, 2019 and updated on September 11, 2022. The language was restricted to English, and no geographical restriction was considered. All papers were imported to Endnote X8 software (Clarivate Analytics), and duplicates were removed. In the next step, the first screening was carried out by the first author, and after evaluating titles and abstracts, irrelevant publications for the aim of the study were excluded. Then, Zahra Rahimian and Leila Rahimian independently gathered eligible studies by examining full texts. All disagreements were discussed and consulted with a third party (Hossein M. Vardanjani).

2.2. Eligibility criteria

There were no filters or limitations for the type of paper or their methodological design. All English records that described at least one potential condition for which euthanasia was allowed, received, or just requested (without necessarily being performed) were included. We also included studies discussing theoretical conditions or authors' opinions linked to euthanasia requests. Articles were excluded if they did not fulfill the above conditions. Publications did not present medical conditions, articles about euthanasia for animals, and studies describing COVID‐19 cases were also excluded.

2.3. Data extraction

A data spreadsheet was used to collect the required information. After reading some articles by these two authors, existing defects in the data collection form were detected and fixed through discussion. Therefore, the final version of the spreadsheet for data collection was created to gather all the required information. The data extraction process was carried out by two independent authors (Zahra Rahimian and Leila Rahimian) and any disagreements were discussed in to reach a consensus. The extracted data included the first author's name, publication year, type of study, country or state assigned to the corresponding author, human development index (HDI) of the country, 27 the legal status of euthanasia in the country, 28 and reasons or conditions that could lead to euthanasia request. We continued to extract data until the number of extracted items reached saturation, that is data extraction was stopped when the last 10 publications of all assessed articles did not add any new items to the list of euthanasia requests. After updating the PubMed search, only one article containing new euthanasia items was added. A list of all conditions leading to euthanasia can be seen in Table 1.

Table 1.

Euthanasia request items in each major classification.

Internal medicine diseases Cancer in a terminal phase, advanced cardiovascular disorders, advanced respiratory disease, acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), multiple morbidities from different physical conditions, severe rheumatologic and musculoskeletal disorders, chronic organ failure, sepsis, systemic phase of mycosis fungicides, chronic vascular inflammatory disease, multidrug‐resistant tuberculosis (MDR‐TB), diabetes mellitus, and Pickwickian syndrome.
Neurological and neurocognitive diseases Alzheimer's disease and dementia, motor neuron diseases, paralysis, stroke/CVA, multiple sclerosis (MS), persistent vegetative state (PVS), severe brain damage/injury, coma, extensive cerebral hemorrhage, Parkinson's disease, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), Huntington disease, Locked‐in syndrome, brain failure, severe mental retardation, spinal cord injury (SCI), Duchenne muscular atrophy.
Psychiatric and mental illnesses Alzheimer's disease and dementia, treatment‐resistant depression, comorbid psychiatric conditions, personality disorders, posttraumatic stress or anxiety disorder (PTSD), end‐stage anorexia nervosa, generalized anxiety disorder, chronic schizophrenia, comorbidity of mental and physical conditions, addiction especially when all therapeutic measures have failed (alcohol and substance abuse), chronic pain syndrome/disorder, severe persistent mental illness, being abused in childhood.
Pediatric diseases Spina bifida, severe brain abnormalities or damage, chromosomal abnormalities, multiple or severe congenital abnormalities, extremely premature infants, severe epidermolysis bullosa, cerebral palsy, osteogenesis imperfecta, critically ill or disabled newborns, trachea‐esophageal fistula (TEF), deformities of the limb or head, inborn errors of metabolism, severe lung hypoplasia, HIV‐infected infants, Tay‐Sachs, hemophilia, extensive organ damage.
Nonspecific conditions Constant unbearable physical or mental suffering without definite treatment (with no prospect of improvement), high probability for early death, uncontrollable continuous pain, being tired of life, advanced state of irreversible decline in capability and quality of life, condition of old age, feeling lonely, refractory symptoms of terminal illness, loss of mental capacity due to terminal illness, irreversible loss of circulatory, respiratory or brain function and other conditions (including meaningless, fear of losing close ones, fear of losing autonomy).

2.4. Evidence synthesis

We merged all conditions into major groups by consulting two internists. First, all items were categorized into adult and pediatric groups. Items included in the adult group were categorized according to major medical fields, including “internal medicine diseases,” “neurological and neurocognitive diseases,” and “psychiatric disorders.” In the adult group, items that fell outside these categories were embedded in the “nonspecific” category (Table 1). Being rare, items in the pediatric group were not divided into different subgroups and this group, itself, was considered as another major medical field. All methodological steps are provided in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Summary of method steps.

3. RESULTS

In PubMed, a total of 3323 records were found. After screening the abstracts and assessing the eligibility of the papers we selected 197 publications (Figure 2). A description of each publication can be found in Table 2, temporal trends are shown in Figure 3.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analysis for scoping reviews (PRISMA‐ScR) flow diagram.

Table 2.

Euthanasia request items reported in each publication.

Row First author Publication year Euthanasia items Article type Country or state Human development index Euthanasia legality
1 Abarshi 29 2009 Terminal phase of cancer, being tired of life Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
5 Adams 30 2003 Being tired of life, terminal phase of cancer, constant unbearable suffering without treatment (incurable or irreversible condition), coma, dementia Review Belgium 0.93 Legal
2 Adchalingam 31 2005 Terminal phase of cancer, cerebral palsy, unbearable suffering without treatment Original report Malaysia 0.80 Illegal
3 Adeyemo 32 2004 Terminal phase of cancer Review Nigeria 0.54 Illegal
4 Ahmed 33 2006 Constant unbearable suffering without treatment Original report Sudan 0.51 Illegal
6 Akabayashi 34 2002 Unbearable suffering without treatment (incurable or irreversible condition), extensive cerebral hemorrhage, terminal phase of cancer, sepsis Original report Japan 0.91 Illegal
7 Albaladejo 35 2019 Advanced cardiovascular disorders, dementia, unbearable suffering without treatment Review USA (Los Angeles) 0.92 Illegal
8 Alvargonzález 36 2012 Alzheimer's disease Review Spain 0.89 Legal
9 Andraghetti 37 2001 Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) Original report Belgium 0.93 Legal
10 Anquinet 38 2013 Terminal phase of cancer Original report Belgium 0.93 Legal
11 Appel 39 2004 Motor neuron disease (Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [ALS]), severe or treatment‐resistant depression Editorial Netherlands 0.94 Legal
12 Asai 40 2001 Constant unbearable suffering without treatment (incurable or irreversible condition), uncontrollable continuous pain Original report Japan 0.91 Illegal
13 Au 41 2007 Uncontrollable continuous pain Editorial Hong Kong 0.94 Illegal
14 Aubry 42 2016 Severe brain damage Editorial France 0.89 Illegal
15 Bahník 43 2019 Terminal phase of cancer, dementia, uncontrollable pain, paralysis, treatment‐resistant depression Original report Czech Republic 0.90 Illegal
16 Barilan 44 2001 Constant unbearable suffering without treatment (incurable or irreversible condition), Alzheimer's disease Review Israel 0.90 Illegal
17 Barone 45 2017 Constant unbearable suffering without treatment (with no prospect of improvement), extremely premature infants, high probability for early death, refractory symptoms associated with very advanced terminal illness, critically ill or disabled newborns Editorial USA (Maryland) 0.92 Illegal
18 Baumrucker 46 2004 Advanced respiratory disease Original report USA 0.92 Illegal
19 Baumrucker 47 2009 Pickwickian syndrome Original report USA 0.92 Illegal
20 Beardsley 48 2018 Terminal phase of cancer, high probability for early death, constant unbearable suffering without treatment Review Australia 0.94 Legal
21 Beckwith 49 2013 Spina bifida, comatose, chromosomal abnormalities, severe brain abnormalities, high probability for early death, Be in an advanced state of irreversible decline in capability and quality of life, trachea‐esophageal fistula (TEF) Review USS (Illinois) 0.93 Illegal
22 Beernaert 50 2018 High probability for early death, cancer Original report Belgium 0.93 Legal
23 Begley 51 2008 Uncontrollable continues pain Original report Ireland 0.95 Illegal
24 Benedict 52 2009 Severe brain abnormalities, HIV‐infected infants, terminal phase of cancer, spina bifida, paralysis Review USA (California) 0.93 Legal
25 Benrimoh 53 2017 End‐stage anorexia nervosa, motor neuron disease (ALS and spinal muscular atrophy), comorbid psychiatric conditions, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), constant unbearable suffering without treatment (with no prospect of improvement) Original report Canada 0.92 Legal
26 Bernheim 54 2001 Terminal phase of cancer Editorial Belgium 0.93 Legal
27 Bernheim 55 2014 Terminal phase of cancer, extensive cerebral hemorrhage, advanced cardiovascular disorders Original report Belgium 0.93 Legal
28 Berry 56 2000 Uncontrollable continuous pain, massive bedsore Editorial UK 0.93 Illegal
29 Bishop 57 2006 Terminal phase of cancer, multimorbidity of psychological and physical conditions Editorial France 0.89 Illegal
30 Blank 58 2001 High probability for early death, Alzheimer's disease, coma Original report USA (Connecticut) 0.92 Illegal
31 Bodwal 59 2019 Persistent vegetative state (PVS) Original report India 0.64 Illegal
32 Boer 60 2018 Addiction, terminal phase of cancer, old age conditions Editorial Netherlands 0.94 Legal
33 Boisvert 61 2010 High probability for early death Editorial Canada 0.92 Legal
34 Bollen 62 2019 Unbearable suffering without treatment (incurable or irreversible condition) Review Belgium 0.93 Legal
35 Bolt 63 2016 Diabetes mellitus, advanced cardiovascular disorders, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), terminal phase of cancer, advanced respiratory disease, severe rheumatologic and musculoskeletal disorders (arthritis) Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
36 Bolt 64 2015 Being tired of life, terminal phase of cancer, dementia Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
37 Booij 65 2013 Huntington's disease, motor neuron disease (ALS), dementia Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
38 Borgsteede 66 2007 High probability for early death, terminal phase of cancer, advanced cardiovascular disorders (heart failure), advanced respiratory disease (COPD), multimorbidity of physical conditions Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
39 Bos 67 2019 Constant unbearable suffering without treatment, terminal phase of cancer, advanced cardiovascular disorders (heart failure) Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
40 Bosshard 68 2003 Paralysis Original report Switzerland 0.95 Legal
41 Brinkman‐Stoppelenburg 69 2014 Terminal phase of cancer, CVA, advanced respiratory disease (COPD), multiple sclerosis (MS), motor neuron disease (ALS), advanced cardiovascular disorders (heart failure) Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
42 Brits 70 2009 Loss of mental capacity due to terminal illness, constant unbearable suffering without treatment (incurable or irreversible condition), be in an advanced state of irreversible decline in capability and quality of life Original report South Africa 0.70 Illegal
43 Brouwer 71 2018 Terminal phase of cancer Review Netherlands 0.94 Legal
44 Browne 72 2006 Terminal phase of cancer Editorial Canada 0.92 Legal
45 Buiting 73 2009 Unbearable suffering without treatment Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
46 Burgermeister 74 2004 Constant unbearable suffering without treatment (incurable or irreversible condition) Editorial France 0.89 Illegal
47 Burgermeister 75 2006 Dementia Editorial Belgium 0.93 Legal
48 Burkhardt 76 2006 Constant unbearable suffering without treatment (incurable or irreversible condition) Review Switzerland 0.95 Legal
49 Carter 77 2016 Multiple congenital abnormalities, Inborn errors of metabolism, terminal phase of cancer, extremely premature infants Editorial Belgium 0.93 Legal
50 Carter 78 2007 Terminal phase of cancer Original report Australia 0.94 Legal
51 Chao 79 2002 Spina bifida, brain abnormalities, treatment‐resistant depression, severe rheumatologic and musculoskeletal disorders (rheumatism), systemic phase of mycosis fungicides, PVS, Alzheimer's disease, coma, terminal phase of cancer Review Netherlands 0.94 Legal
52 Chavan 80 2012 PVS Editorial India 0.64 Illegal
53 Cohen 81 2018 Terminal phase of cancer, stroke, advanced cardiovascular disorders Original report Belgium 0.93 Legal
54 Cohen‐Almagor 82 2002 Terminal phase of cancer Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
55 Cohen‐Almagor 83 2002 Alzheimer's disease, cancer, AIDS, severe congenital abnormality Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
56 Cohen‐Almagor 84 2009 Constant unbearable suffering without treatment (with no prospect of improvement) Review Belgium 0.93 Legal
57 Cohen‐Almagor 85 2015 Alzheimer's disease, dementia Review Belgium 0.93 Legal
58 Cohen‐Almagor 86 2018 Constant unbearable physical or mental suffering without treatment (with no prospect of improvement) Editorial Belgium 0.93 Legal
59 Comby 87 2005 Terminal phase of cancer, AIDS Original report France 0.89 Illegal
60 Cuttini 88 2004 Extremely premature infants, severe brain damage Original report Italy 0.88 Illegal
61 de Beaufort 89 2016 Dementia, Alzheimer's disease, Huntington's disease, AIDS Editorial Netherlands 0.94 Legal
62 de Boer 90 2010 Dementia Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
63 De Haan 91 2002 Constant unbearable suffering without treatment (incurable or irreversible condition) Review UK 0.93 Illegal
64 Dees 92 2013 Terminal phase of cancer, chronic pain syndrome, advanced cardiovascular disorders, being tired of life Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
65 Demedts 93 2018 Unbearable mental suffering Original report Belgium 0.93 Legal
66 Denys 94 2018 Treatment‐resistant depression Editorial Netherlands 0.94 Legal
67 Deschepper 95 2014 Terminal phase of cancer, unbearable mental suffering Original report Belgium 0.93 Legal
68 Dierickx 96 2015 CVA, terminal phase of cancer, advanced respiratory disease, advanced cardiovascular disorders Original report Belgium 0.93 Legal
69 Dierickx 97 2016 Motor neuron disease, terminal phase of cancer, AIDS, advanced cardiovascular disorders Original report Belgium 0.93 Legal
70 Dierickx 98 2017 Dementia, comorbid psychiatric conditions Original report Belgium 0.93 Legal
71 Dierickx 99 2019 High probability for early death, terminal phase of cancer Original report Belgium 0.93 Legal
72 Dimond 100 2000 Terminal phase of cancer, severe rheumatologic and musculoskeletal disorders (rheumatism) Editorial UK 0.93 Illegal
73 Dimond 101 2004 Multimorbidity of physical conditions, paralysis, motor neuron disease Editorial UK 0.93 Illegal
74 Downie 102 2000 Constant unbearable physical suffering without treatment (with no prospect of improvement), severe congenital abnormalities Editorial Netherlands 0.94 Legal
75 Draper 103 2010 Alzheimer's disease, Huntington's disease, comorbid psychiatric conditions Review Australia 0.94 Legal
76 Emanue 104 2017 Cancer, AIDS, motor neuron disease (ALS) Editorial USA (Philadelphia) 0.92 Illegal
77 Emanuel 105 2005 Terminal phase of cancer Editorial USA (Philadelphia) 0.92 Illegal
78 Emanuel 106 2000 Terminal phase of cancer Original report USA (Philadelphia) 0.92 Illegal
79 Emanuel 107 2016 Terminal phase of cancer, high probability for early death, severe congenital abnormalities, advanced cardiovascular disorders, advanced respiratory disease Review USA (Philadelphia) 0.92 Illegal
80 Erdek 108 2015 Terminal phase of cancer Editorial USA (Maryland) 0.92 Illegal
81 Evenblij 109 2019 Constant unbearable suffering without treatment (incurable or irreversible condition), personality disorders Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
82 Evenblij 110 2019 Terminal phase of cancer, advanced cardiovascular disorders, dementia, advanced respiratory disease Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
83 Fitzgerald 111 2004 Chronic vascular inflammatory disease Editorial USA (California) 0.92 Legal
84 Frenkel 112 2000 Tay‐Sachs, coma, motor neuron disease (ALS) Review Israel 0.90 Illegal
85 Friedel 113 2018 High probability for early death, unbearable suffering without treatment (incurable or irreversible condition) Editorial Belgium 0.93 Legal
86 Gamester 114 2009 Chronic organ failure Editorial Belgium 0.93 Legal
87 Garrard 115 2005 Constant suffering without definite treatment Review UK 0.93 Illegal
88 Gastmans 116 2010 Be in an advanced state of irreversible decline in capability and quality of life Review Belgium 0.93 Legal
89 Georges 117 2007 Terminal phase of cancer, treatment‐resistant depression, being tired of life Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
90 Georges 118 2005 Terminal phase of cancer Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
91 Gordijn 119 2001 Alzheimer's disease Review Ireland 0.95 Illegal
92 Gorsuch 120 2007 Chromosomal abnormalities, hemophilia Editorial USA (Colorado) 0.92 Legal
93 Guirimand 121 2014 Terminal phase of cancer, motor neuron disease (ALS) Original report France 0.89 Illegal
94 Guo 122 2006 Terminal phase of cancer, PVS, severe brain damage, uncontrollable continuous pain, be in an advanced state of irreversible decline in capability and quality of life Review UK 0.93 Illegal
95 Hall 123 2018 Terminal phase of cancer, constant unbearable physical or mental suffering without definite treatment (with no prospect of improvement), addiction especially when all therapeutic measures have failed (alcohol and substance abuse) Editorial Australia 0.94 Legal
96 Hanson 124 2016 Severe epidermolysis bullosa, chromosomal abnormalities, spina bifida Editorial USA (Kentucky) 0.92 Illegal
97 Hanssen‐de Wol 125 2008 Unbearable suffering without treatment (incurable or irreversible condition), terminal phase of cancer Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
98 Haverkate 126 2000 Treatment‐resistant depression Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
99 Hayashi 127 2002 Paralysis, treatment‐resistant depression, generalized anxiety disorder, terminal phase of cancer, high probability for early death, constant unbearable suffering without treatment (incurable or irreversible condition), uncontrollable pain Review Japan 0.91 Illegal
100 Hertogh 128 2009 Stroke, dementia Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
101 Hodel 129 2016 Severe persistent mental illness, chronic schizophrenia, end‐stage anorexia nervosa Editorial Switzerland 0.95 Legal
102 Hurst 130 2003 Motor neuron disease Review Switzerland 0.95 Legal
103 Jacobs 131 2018 Multimorbidity of physical conditions, terminal phase of cancer, multidrug‐resistant tuberculosis (MDR‐TB) Original report South Africa 0.70 Illegal
104 Jansen‐van der Weide 132 2005 Terminal phase of cancer, motor neuron disease (ALS), MS, advanced respiratory disease, advanced cardiovascular disorders (heart failure), be in an advanced state of irreversible decline in capability and quality of life, depression Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
105 Johansen 133 2005 Terminal phase of cancer Original report Norway 0.95 Illegal
106 Kakuk 134 2007 Motor neuron disease, PVS, paralysis Review UK 0.93 Illegal
107 Kanchan 135 2016 PVS Editorial India 0.64 Illegal
108 Karlsson 136 2007 Cancer, Huntington's disease, dementia, CVA, severe brain damage, AIDS, advanced cardiovascular disorders (heart failure), Duchenne muscular atrophy, motor neuron disease (ALS), MS, spinal cord injury (SCI), paralysis Original report Sweden 0.93 Illegal
109 Kelly 137 2009 Terminal phase of cancer Original report Australia 0.94 Legal
110 Kioko and Requena 138 2018 Constant unbearable suffering without treatment Editorial Italy 0.88 Illegal
111 Kissane 139 2000 Systemic phase of mycosis fungicides Original report Australia 0.94 Legal
112 Klein 140 2004 Terminal phase of cancer, paralysis Review Germany 0.93 Illegal
113 Kompanje 141 2007 Locked‐in syndrome, extensive cerebral hemorrhage Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
114 Koopman 142 2016 Terminal phase of cancer, advanced cardiovascular disorders, advanced respiratory disease Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
115 Kouwenhoven 143 2013 Treatment‐resistant depression, dementia, terminal phase of cancer, feeling lonely Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
116 Kouwenhoven 144 2015 Dementia Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
117 Kouwenhoven 145 2014 Terminal phase of cancer, treatment‐resistant depression, dementia, feeling lonely Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
118 Kuschner 146 2009 Terminal phase of cancer, extensive cerebral hemorrhage, chronic organ failure Original report USA 0.92 Illegal
119 Lavery 147 2001 AIDS Original report Canada 0.92 Legal
120 Leenaars 148 2001 Terminal phase of cancer, high probability for early death, constant unbearable suffering without treatment (incurable or irreversible condition) Editorial Ireland 0.95 Illegal
121 Legemaate 149 2013 Dementia, cancer, being tired of life Review Netherlands 0.94 Legal
122 Levy 150 2013 Locked‐in syndrome, motor neuron disease (ALS), cancer, severe mental retardation, chronic schizophrenia Original report Israel 0.90 Illegal
123 Lewis 151 2009 Cancer, multimorbidity of physical conditions, motor neuron disease (ALS), MS Review UK 0.93 Illegal
124 Loewy 152 2004 Terminal phase of cancer Editorial USA (California) 0.92 Legal
125 Lopez‐Castroman 153 2017 Constant unbearable suffering without treatment (incurable or irreversible condition) Editorial France 0.89 Illegal
126 Maessen 154 2014 Motor neuron disease (ALS) Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
127 Maessen 155 2010 Motor neuron disease (ALS), cancer, advanced cardiovascular disorders (heart failure) Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
128 Maggiore 156 2005 Extensive cerebral hemorrhage Original report Italy 0.88 Illegal
129 Mak 157 2003 Terminal phase of cancer Editorial Hong Kong 0.94 Illegal
130 Mak 158 2005 AIDS Original report UK 0.93 Illegal
131 Malpas 159 2013 Depression, uncontrollable continuous pain, personality disorders, generalized anxiety disorder, posttraumatic stress or anxiety, alcohol and substance abuse, comorbid psychiatric conditions, chronic schizophrenia, locked‐in syndrome Editorial New Zealand 0.93 Legal
132 Manninen 160 2006 Constant unbearable suffering without treatment (incurable or irreversible condition), chromosomal abnormalities, TEF, spina bifida, severe brain abnormalities, motor neuron disease (ALS) Editorial Netherlands 0.94 Legal
133 Marcoux 161 2005 Treatment‐resistant depression, being tired of life, constant unbearable suffering without treatment, uncontrollable continuous pain Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
134 McGlade 162 2000 Terminal phase of cancer, Parkinson's disease, MS, stroke, severe rheumatologic and musculoskeletal disorders (arthritis) Original report Ireland 0.94 Illegal
135 Miljkovic 163 2013 Terminal phase of cancer Review USA (Texas) 0.92 Illegal
136 Miller 164 2019 Alzheimer's disease Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
137 Miller 165 2017 Parkinson's disease, stroke, Alzheimer's disease, terminal phase of cancer, multimorbidity of physical conditions, comorbid psychiatric conditions, CVA, Severe rheumatologic and musculoskeletal disorders Review Netherlands 0.94 Legal
138 Moody 166 2003 Paralysis, motor neuron disease Original report UK 0.93 Illegal
139 Moynier‐Vantieghem 167 2010 Advanced cardiovascular disorders, advanced respiratory disease (COPD), Parkinson's disease, dementia, severe rheumatologic and musculoskeletal disorders (Arthriti)s, treatment‐resistant depression Original report Switzerland 0.95 Legal
140 Mukhida 168 2007 Cerebral palsy Original report Canada 0.92 Legal
141 Nair‐Collins 21 2017 Anoxic encephalopathy, coma, multiple congenital abnormalities, deformities of the limb or head, multimorbidity of physical conditions Review USA (Florida) 0.92 Illegal
142 Nathanson 169 2001 AIDS, terminal phase of cancer Editorial UK 0.93 Illegal
143 Nicolini 170 2019 Treatment‐resistant depression, personality disorders, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), comorbid psychiatric conditions, anxiety disorder, multimorbidity of physical and psychological conditions, constant unbearable suffering without treatment, chronic pain disorders, severe rheumatologic and musculoskeletal disorders Original report Belgium 0.93 Legal
144 Norwood 171 2009 Terminal phase of cancer, stroke, advanced cardiovascular disorders Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
145 Novaković 172 2009 Chronic organ failure Original report Bosnia 0.78 Illegal
146 Nuland 173 2000 Terminal phase of cancer Editorial USA (New Haven) 0.92 Illegal
147 Oehmichen 174 2000 AIDS, terminal phase of cancer, dementia, extremely premature infants, PVS, severe brain damage Review Germany 0.93 Illegal
148 Okishiro 175 2009 Motor neuron disease Original report Japan 0.91 Illegal
149 Olié 176 2016 Personality disorder, posttraumatic stress or anxiety, ASD Review France 0.89 Illegal
150 Onwuteaka‐Philipsen 177 2012 Terminal phase of cancer, advanced cardiovascular disorders Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
151 Onwuteaka‐Philipsen 178 2010 Terminal phase of cancer, motor neuron disease (ALS), treatment‐resistant depression Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
152 Pacheco 179 2003 Terminal phase of cancer Original report USA (Ohio) 0.92 Illegal
153 Pasman 180 2009 Severe rheumatologic and musculoskeletal disorders (Rheumatism), Parkinson's disease, stroke, paralysis Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
154 Perreault 181 2019 Constant unbearable suffering without treatment (incurable or irreversible condition), be in an advanced state of irreversible decline in capability and quality of life, high probability for early death, advanced respiratory disease (COPD), severe rheumatologic and musculoskeletal disorders (advanced stage of erosive osteoarthritis, Sjogren's syndrome), ASD, posttraumatic stress or anxiety, major depression Original report Canada 0.92 Legal
155 Picard 182 2019 Dementia Original report Belgium 0.93 Legal
156 Pope 183 2016 Brain failure, coma, irreversible loss of circulatory, respiratory or brain function Original report USA (Minnesota) 0.92 Illegal
157 Poreddi 184 2013 PVS, severe brain damage (brain death) Original report India 0.64 Illegal
158 Portacolone 185 2019 Alzheimer's disease Original report Switzerland 0.95 Legal
159 Quill 186 2018 Dementia Editorial Netherlands 0.94 Legal
160 Roscoe 187 2001 AIDS, terminal phase of cancer, advanced cardiovascular disorders, advanced respiratory disease, MS, depression Original report USA (Florida) 0.92 Illegal
161 Ruijs 188 2014 Constant unbearable suffering without treatment Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
162 Rurup 189 2005 Terminal phase of cancer, motor neuron disease (ALS), advanced respiratory disease (COPD), advanced cardiovascular disorders (heart failure) Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
163 Rurup 190 2005 Multimorbidity of physical conditions, terminal phase of cancer, advanced cardiovascular disorders, severe rheumatologic and musculoskeletal disorders (painful arthritis) Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
164 Salib 191 2001 Brain failure, terminal phase of cancer Original report UK 0.93 Illegal
165 Schäfer 192 2006 Terminal phase of cancer Editorial Germany 0.93 Illegal
166 Schuurmans 193 2019 Dementia Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
167 Seear and Fraser 194 2018 Addiction especially when all therapeutic measures have failed (alcohol and substance abuse) Editorial Australia 0.94 Legal
168 Shah 195 2014 PVS, uncontrollable continuous pain, unbearable suffering without treatment (incurable or irreversible condition) Editorial Pakistan 0.56 Illegal
169 Sharp 196 2012 Dementia Editorial USA (Ohio) 0.92 Illegal
170 Shaw 197 2007 Terminal phase of cancer Editorial Australia 0.94 Legal
171 Shekhar 198 2013 Severe brain damage, paralysis Editorial India 0.64 Illegal
172 Simillis 199 2008 PVS Review UK 0.93 Illegal
173 Sinha 200 2012 Terminal phase of cancer, AIDS Editorial India 0.64 Illegal
174 Sleeboom‐faulkner 201 2006 Terminal phase of cancer, chronic organ failure, severe brain abnormalities or damage, Alzheimer's disease Review China 0.75 Illegal
175 Smets 202 2010 Terminal phase of cancer, MS Original report Belgium 0.93 Legal
176 Snijdewind 203 2014 Parkinson's disease, AIDS, dementia, terminal phase of cancer, MS, condition of old age, advanced cardiovascular disorders (heart failure), advanced respiratory disease (COPD) Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
177 Sprung 204 2018 Being tired of life, terminal phase of cancer, unbearable suffering without treatment (incurable or irreversible condition) Review Israel 0.90 Illegal
178 Thienpont 205 2015 ASD, personality disorder, treatment‐resistant depression, anorexia nervosa Original report Belgium 0.93 Legal
179 Thomas 206 2006 Cerebral palsy, chromosomal abnormalities, deformities of the limb or head, mental retardation, severe brain abnormalities, spina bifida Review Canada 0.92 Legal
180 Tomlinson 207 2015 Dementia Original report UK 0.93 Illegal
181 Tuffery‐Wijne 208 2018 ASD, multimorbidity of physical conditions, multimorbidity of mental and physical conditions, comorbid psychiatric conditions, personality disorder, constant unbearable suffering without treatment, being abused in childhood Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
182 van Alphen 209 2010 Terminal phase of cancer, treatment‐resistant depression, advanced cardiovascular disorders, advanced respiratory disease (COPD), MS, motor neuron disease (ALS) and muscular atrophy Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
183 van den Berg 12 2022 Feeling lonely, irreversible decline in capability and quality of life, old age, being tired of life, meaningless, fear of dying close ones, fear of losing independence Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
184 van Heest 210 2009 Terminal phase of cancer Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
185 van Tol 211 2012 Terminal phase of cancer Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
186 van Wijngaarden 212 2016 Treatment‐resistant depression Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
187 Veldink 213 2002 Motor neuron disease (ALS), sepsis Original report Netherlands 0.94 Legal
188 Verhagen 214 2013 Multiple or severe congenital abnormalities, constant unbearable suffering without treatment, osteogenesis imperfect (type 2) Review Netherlands 0.94 Legal
189 Verhagen 215 2014 Severe epidermolysis bullosa Review Netherlands 0.94 Legal
190 Verhagen 216 2005 Severe brain abnormalities or damages, spina bifida, extensive organ damage Editorial Netherlands 0.94 Legal
191 Vermeersch 217 2002 Multi morbidity of physical conditions, partial paralysis Editorial Belgium 0.93 Legal
192 Vincent 218 2006 Terminal phase of cancer, severe rheumatologic and musculoskeletal disorders (painful arthritis) Original report Belgium 0.93 Legal
193 Vink 219 2016 Dementia Editorial Netherlands 0.94 Legal
194 Virik 220 2002 Multimorbidity of physical conditions Original report Australia 0.94 Legal
195 Voultsos 221 2014 Extremely premature infants, critically ill or disabled newborns, severe epidermolysis bullosa, osteogenesis imperfecta, spina bifida, severe lung hypoplasia, chromosomal abnormalities, severe brain abnormalities or damage Review Greece 0.88 Illegal
196 Waals 222 2018 Paralysis Original report Belgium 0.93 Legal
197 Wand 223 2016 Multimorbidity of physical conditions Original report Australia 0.94 Legal

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The time‐trend of all publications about euthanasia.

Out of 197 publications, a total of 184 (93.40%) articles were written in developed countries and 118 (59.89%) in regions where euthanasia is legal. About half of the studies were original (53.80%), one in five was a review (20.30%), and one in four was a letter or editorial (25.90%).

The frequency of publications reported euthanasia in all major categories is provided in Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The frequency of publications reported euthanasia in all major categories (medicine disease, psychiatry and mental illnesses: psychiatry and mental illnesses: pediatric disease, and nonspecific conditions). AIDS, acquired immune deficiency syndrome; MDR‐TB, multidrug‐resistant tuberculosis; PTSD, posttraumatic stress or anxiety disorder. Neurological and neurocognitive diseases: ASD, autism spectrum disorder; MS, multiple sclerosis; PVS, persistent vegetative state; SCI, spinal cord injury/other conditions (meaningless, fear of Losing close ones, fear of losing autonomy).

4. DISCUSSION

4.1. Summary of main findings

There is no consensus about the criteria or guidelines that have been set for identifying a patient eligible for euthanasia in different countries although some authors have previously outlined general or nonspecific conditions for euthanasia requests. In this study, we have listed and categorized all published records of euthanasia requests around the world into five broad groups. Internal medicine diseases were the most common conditions for which euthanasia was requested or allowed, whereas pediatric diseases were the least common.

4.2. What this study adds and implications for practice and research

The most‐reported item was constantly unbearable physical or mental suffering without definite treatment. It is defined as a “profoundly personal experience of an actual or perceived impending threat to the integrity or life of the person that has a considerable duration and a central place in the person's life.” 224 Another frequently mentioned condition was the high risk of early death, which was generally defined as having a life expectancy of less than 6 months despite available treatments. 50 Some general definitions consider patients to have a life expectancy of less than 6 months if they meet the nondisease‐specific deterioration in clinical status, signs, symptoms, and laboratory results. 225 This kind of evidence suggests that it does not matter which disease a patient may suffer from, what is important is that his condition must be intolerable and incurable with a high probability of near‐death that depends on the legal requirements. 225

Cancer is among the main reasons for euthanasia requests in recent years. One of the motivations is the fear of becoming dependent or being a burden. The extreme pain and discomfort they may experience in the end‐stage condition can also trigger euthanasia requests. 187 , 226 Euthanasia is most commonly requested by cancer patients with a life expectancy of fewer than 6 months and when there is no therapeutic treatment to extend the life span. 50 Information demands about euthanasia procedures are frequent in the early stages of cancer if the patients are in excruciating pain, fatigue, or nausea. 50 Pain, fatigue, loss of dignity, and dependency were the most commonly stated causes of suffering among patients with cancer. 155 Overall, extreme pain, loss of autonomy, decreased ability to do meaningful activities, extreme pain or other disease‐related symptoms, and worrying about the future are common reasons that make patients request assisted death. 227

Psychiatric and mental illnesses contribute significantly to the health‐related global burden. 228 The use of euthanasia in psychiatric diseases is controversial, and infrequent. 64 Clinicians are less inclined to recommend or perform euthanasia for patients suffering from psychiatric diseases than for patients with life‐threatening somatic illnesses. 64 , 143 , 229 Verhofstadt et al. divided psychiatric patients' unbearable suffering into five categories: medically related suffering, intrapersonal suffering, interpersonal suffering, suffering connected to patients' role and interaction in society, and existential suffering. 224 The most common reason for the rejection of euthanasia requests in psychiatric illnesses is the concern about if the suffering is unbearable and if the request is well‐considered. 110 A study showed that 62% of Dutch psychiatrists who had received explicit euthanasia requests in their career course had refused them on at least one occasion; however, in some cases, psychiatrists referred patients who requested euthanasia to another physician following refusing their euthanasia request. 109

In some countries, euthanasia in terminally ill patients with neurological problems was requested or performed. 230 , 231 Patients' quality of life can be severely impacted under these conditions. In the latter stages of various motor neuron illnesses, such as ALS, patients' capacity and quality of life can be drastically reduced, leading to hopelessness, depression, and anxiety. 232 These factors may increase the urge to die in people who are affected.

As demonstrated in the results, the frequency of euthanasia requests among children is lower than in adults. The issue of euthanasia is difficult to address in the pediatric field. 233 Despite this difficulty, some countries have tried to legislate it during the last decade. 234 Although there is no age limit in a few countries such as Belgium, in some nations, there is controversy over the age cutoff for children to be eligible. 234 , 235 Some authors have stated that euthanasia could be received by infants under the age of 1 year to reduce the pain and suffering of severely ill newborns with fatal disorders. 236 Also they claimed that children above the age of 12 can request euthanasia under certain circumstances. 71 According to some authors, euthanasia should not be allowed under the age of 12 since children are unable to make suitable decisions about their lives. 71 Another challenging issue about euthanasia request in children that is worth mentioning is that although, parents do not have an official right to request euthanasia for their children, some studies about end‐of‐life decisions reveal that some pediatricians receive an explicit request for euthanasia for children from their parents. 237 , 238

4.3. Strengths and limitations

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first that listed and categorized published records of euthanasia requests around the world into five broad groups besides reporting the frequency of each condition in each group. It facilitates informing scientists and researchers about the trends of euthanasia requests during different years and in different countries around the world.

This study presents some limitations. Only PubMed articles were selected due to the large number of available studies. Furthermore, we did not assess the legal status of each request in the countries they were made. The permissibility of the requests may vary depending on each country's legislation and policies. Additional updated research should be conducted to evaluate medical conditions for which euthanasia is accepted, and acceptance rates depending on the type of condition motivating the requests. In addition, the majority of articles were written in countries where euthanasia is legal, we may be biased towards the specific legislation of jurisdictions in which euthanasia is legal; however, we tried to minimize its impact through including documents (e.g., letters and commentary) written in countries where euthanasia is not legal.

Finally, it should be mentioned that some of our results may be rooted in publication biases. 239 Cancer is a prevalent illness with a high impact on public opinion, probably facilitating the euthanasia demands. 240 Indeed, both the general public and healthcare workers in many countries approve of the resort to euthanasia for cancer, especially in the terminal phases. On the contrary, some categories of euthanasia requests may be underrepresented because of contextual factors or the consequences of the illnesses. 110 Patients suffering from psychiatric conditions may lack the emotional or volitional stability to navigate through the bureaucratic load of a euthanasia request.

5. CONCLUSION

In summary, this study gathers and describes all conditions under which euthanasia has been requested or allowed. This information may serve as a roadmap for future research, clinical decision‐making, and care policies.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Zahra Rahimian: Conceptualization; investigation; funding acquisition; writing—original draft; methodology; validation; visualization; writing—review and editing; software; formal analysis; data curation. Leila Rahimian: Investigation; funding acquisition; writing—original draft. Jorge Lopez‐Castroman: Writing—original draft; writing—review and editing. Jeyran Ostovarfar: Investigation; funding acquisition. Mohammad J. Fallahi: Writing—review and editing. Mohammad A. Nayeri: Writing—original draft. Hossein M. Vardanjani: Writing—review and editing; writing—original draft; formal analysis; validation.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

TRANSPARENCY STATEMENT

The lead author Hossein Molavi Vardanjani affirms that this manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned (and, if relevant, registered) have been explained.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This paper was part of the thesis of Zahra Rahimian for obtaining the Master of Public Health degree. We thank Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. We thank Prof. Raffaella Calati, Dr. Mehrnoosh Ebadi, Dr. Syed Reza Abdipour Mehrian, and Sheikh Mohammad Taghi Nejabat for their support and guidance.

Rahimian Z, Rahimian L, Lopez‐Castroman J, et al. What medical conditions lead to a request for euthanasia? A rapid scoping review. Health Sci Rep. 2024;7:e1978. 10.1002/hsr2.1978

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions. All of the extracted data are represented within the manuscript.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Materstvedt LJ, Clark D, Ellershaw J, et al. Euthanasia and physician‐assisted suicide: a view from an EAPC Ethics Task Force. Palliat Med. 2003;17(2):97‐101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Dierickx S, Cohen J. Medical assistance in dying: research directions. BMJ Supp Palliat Care. 2019;9(4):370‐372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Sanz TRV, Pastor PP, Moreno‐Milán B, Hanlon LFM, Herreros B. Spanish regulation of euthanasia and physician‐assisted suicide. J Med Ethics. 2023;49(1):49‐55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Dyer O, White C, Rada AG. Assisted dying: law and practice around the world. BMJ. 2015;351:h4481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Bartels L, Otlowski M. A right to die? Euthanasia and the law in Australia. J Law Med. 2010;17:532‐555. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Tsai BC, Menkes DB. New Zealand doctors and euthanasia—legal and practical considerations of the End of Life Choice Act. N Z Med J. 2020;133(1522):149‐160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Raposo BVL. Euthanasia Please, We are Portuguese; 2020. https://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/2020/03/05/euthanasia-please-we-are-portuguese/
  • 8. Parry JK, Munson C. Negotiating a Good Death: Euthanasia in the Netherlands. Routledge; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Roy DJ, Rapin C‐H. Regarding euthanasia. Eur J Palliat Care. 1994;1(1):1‐4. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Ebrahim AFM. Organ Transplantation, Euthanasia, Cloning and Animal Experimentation an Islamic View. The Islamic Foundation; 2001.
  • 11. Vogel HG. Drug Discovery and Evaluation: Pharmacological Assays. Springer Science & Business Media; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. van den Berg VE, Zomers ML, van Thiel GJ, Leget CJ, van Delden JJ, van Wijngaarden EJ. Requests for euthanasia or assisted suicide of people without (severe) illness. Health Policy. 2022;126:824‐830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Thomas R, Pesut B, Puurveen G, Thorne S, Tishelman C, Leimbigler B. Medical assistance in dying: a review of Canadian health authority policy documents. Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2023;10:23333936231167309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Cohen J, Van Landeghem P, Carpentier N, Deliens L. Public acceptance of euthanasia in Europe: a survey study in 47 countries. Int J Public Health. 2014;59(1):143‐156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Glover J. Causing Death and Saving Lives: The Moral Problems of Abortion, Infanticide, Suicide, Euthanasia, Capital Punishment, War and other Life‐or‐Death Choices. Penguin; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Garcia JLA. Health versus harm: euthanasia and physicians’ duties. J Med Philos. 2007;32(1):7‐24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Bernheim JL, Deschepper R, Distelmans W, Mullie A, Bilsen J, Deliens L. Development of palliative care and legalisation of euthanasia: antagonism or synergy? BMJ. 2008;336(7649):864‐867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Dierickx S, Deliens L, Cohen J, Chambaere K. Involvement of palliative care in euthanasia practice in a context of legalized euthanasia: a population‐based mortality follow‐back study. Palliat Med. 2018;32(1):114‐122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Burns KA. An invitation to feminist ethics. Teach Philos. 2006;29(2):181‐184. [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Brassington I. What passive euthanasia is. BMC Med Ethics. 2020;21:41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Nair‐Collins M. Medical futility and involuntary passive euthanasia. Perspect Biol Med. 2018;60(3):415‐422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Gutierrez Castillo AG, Gutierrez Castillo J. Active and passive euthanasia: current opinion of Mexican medical students. Cureus. 2018;10(7):e3047. 10.7759/cureus.3047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Abohaimed S, Matar B, Al‐Shimali H, et al. Attitudes of physicians towards different types of euthanasia in Kuwait. Med Princ Pract. 2019;28(3):199‐207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Smets T, Bilsen J, Cohen J, Rurup ML, Deliens L. Legal euthanasia in Belgium: characteristics of all reported euthanasia cases. Med Care. 2010;48:187‐192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Calati R, Olié E, Dassa D, Gramaglia C, Guillaume S, Madeddu F, Courtet P. Euthanasia and assisted suicide in psychiatric patients: a systematic review of the literature. J Psychiatr Res. 2020;135:153‐173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA‐ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467‐473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Human Development Index (HDI) by Country . 2022. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/hdi-by-country
  • 28. The Countries Where Euthanasia is Legal . 2021. https://www.theweek.co.uk/102978/countries-where-euthanasia-is-legal
  • 29. Abarshi E, Onwuteaka‐Philipsen BD, van der Wal G. Euthanasia requests and cancer types in the Netherlands: is there a relationship? Health Policy. 2009;89(2):168‐173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Adams M. Comparative reflections on the Belgian euthanasia act 2002. Med Law Rev. 2003;11:353‐376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Adchalingam K, Kong WH, Zakiah MA, Zaini M, Wong YL, Lang CC. Attitudes of medical students towards euthanasia in a multicultural setting. Med J Malaysia. 2005;60(1):46‐49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Adeyemo WL. Sigmund Freud: smoking habit, oral cancer and euthanasia. Niger J Med J Natl Ass Resid Doc Niger. 2004;13(2):189‐195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Ahmed A, Kheir M Attitudes towards euthanasia among final‐year Khartoum University medical students. East Mediterr Health J, 12 (3‐4), 391‐397, 2006. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Akabayashi A. Euthanasia, assisted suicide, and cessation of life support: Japan's policy, law, and an analysis of whistle blowing in two recent mercy killing cases. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55(4):517‐527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Albaladejo A. Fear of assisted dying: could it lead to euthanasia on demand or worsen access to palliative care? BMJ. 2019;364:l852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Alvargonzález D. Alzheimer's disease and euthanasia. J Aging Stud. 2012;26(4):377‐385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Andraghetti R, Foran S, Colebunders R, et al. Euthanasia: from the perspective of HIV infected persons in Europe. HIV Med. 2001;2(1):3‐10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Anquinet L, Raus K, Sterckx S, Smets T, Deliens L, Rietjens JA. Similarities and differences between continuous sedation until death and euthanasia–professional caregivers’ attitudes and experiences: a focus group study. Palliat Med. 2013;27(6):553‐561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Appel SH. Euthanasia and Physician‐Assisted Suicide in ALS: A Commentary. Sage Publications Sage CA; 2004:405‐406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Asai A, Ohnishi M, Nagata SK, Tanida N, Yamazaki Y. Doctors’ and nurses’ attitudes towards and experiences of voluntary euthanasia: survey of members of the Japanese Association of Palliative Medicine. J Med Ethics. 2001;27(5):324‐330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Au DK. Euthanasia and physician‐assisted suicide: ongoing controversies. Hong Kong Med J. 2007;13(6):419‐420. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Aubry R. End‐of‐life, euthanasia, and assisted suicide: an update on the situation in France. Rev Neurol. 2016;172(12):719‐724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Bahník Š, Vranka MA, Trefná K. What makes euthanasia justifiable? the role of symptoms’ characteristics and interindividual differences. Death Stud. 2021;45(3):226‐237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Barilan YM, Weintraub M. Pantagruelism: a Rabelaisian inspiration for understanding poisoning, euthanasia and abortion in the Hippocratic oath and in contemporary clinical practice. Theor Med Bioeth. 2001;22(3):269‐286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Barone S, Unguru Y. Should euthanasia be considered iatrogenic? AMA J Ethics. 2017;19(8):802‐814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Baumrucker SJ. Ethics roundtable. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 2004;21(3):233‐236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Baumrucker SJ, Sheldon JE, Stolick M, et al. Comfort care versus euthanasia. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 2009;26(5):413‐419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Beardsley C, Brown K, Sandroussi C. Euthanasia and surgeons: an overview of the Victorian Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2017 and its relevance to surgical practice in Australia. ANZ J Surg. 2018;88(10):956‐958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Beckwith J. A cry for help: preventing passive euthanasia decision‐making for neonates with non‐fatal congenital defects. J Leg Med. 2013;34(3):273‐294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Beernaert K, Haverbeke C, Van Belle S, Deliens L, Cohen J. Information needs about palliative care and euthanasia: a survey of patients in different phases of their cancer trajectory. Patient Educ Couns. 2018;101(1):132‐138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Begley AM. Guilty but good: defending voluntary active euthanasia from a virtue perspective. Nurs Ethics. 2008;15(4):434‐445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Benedict S, Shields L, O'Donnell AJ. Children's “euthanasia” in Nazi Germany. J Pediatr Nurs. 2009;24(6):506‐516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Benrimoh D, Perreault A, Van Den Eynde F. Euthanasia requests in a Canadian psychiatric emergency room: a case series. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2017;55:37‐44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Bernheim JL. Euthanasia in Europe. Lancet. 2001;357(9261):1038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Bernheim JL, Distelmans W, Mullie A, Ashby MA. Questions and answers on the Belgian model of integral end‐of‐life care: experiment? prototype?: “Eu‐Euthanasia”: the close historical, and evidently synergistic, relationship between palliative care and Euthanasia in Belgium: an interview with a doctor involved in the early development of both and two of his successors. J Bioeth Inq. 2014;11(4):507‐529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Berry P. Euthanasia—a dialogue. J Med Ethics. 2000;26(5):370‐374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Bishop JP. Framing euthanasia. J Med Ethics. 2006;32(4):225‐228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Blank K, Robison J, Prigerson H, Schwartz HI. Instability of attitudes about euthanasia and physician assisted suicide in depressed older hospitalized patients. Gen Hosp Psychistry. 2001;23(6):326‐332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Bodwal J, Kumar Sikary A, Chauhan M, Behera C. Request for euthanasia in the suicide note of a planned suicide. Med Leg J. 2019;87(2):97‐99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Boer T. Euthanasia and addiction: a comment from the Netherlands. Addiction. 2018;113(7):1184‐1185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Boisvert M. Should physicians be open to euthanasia?: YES. Can Fam Phys. 2010;56(4):320‐322. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Bollen JAM, Ten Hoopen R, van der Hoeven MAHBM, et al. Organ donation after euthanasia in children: Belgian and Dutch perspectives. Arch Dis Child. 2019;104(9):827‐830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Bolt EE, Pasman HRW, Deeg DJH, Onwuteaka‐Philipsen BD. From advance euthanasia directive to euthanasia: stable preference in older people? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(8):1628‐1633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Bolt EE, Snijdewind MC, Willems DL, van der Heide A, Onwuteaka‐Philipsen BD. Can physicians conceive of performing euthanasia in case of psychiatric disease, dementia or being tired of living? J Med Ethics. 2015;41(8):592‐598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Booij SJ, Rödig V, Engberts DP, Tibben A, Roos RAC. Euthanasia and advance directives in Huntington's disease: qualitative analysis of interviews with patients. J Huntington's Dis. 2013;2(3):323‐330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Borgsteede SD, Deliens L, Graafland‐Riedstra C, Francke AL, van der Wal G, Willems DL. Communication about euthanasia in general practice: opinions and experiences of patients and their general practitioners. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;66(2):156‐161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Bos DC, de Graaf E, de Graeff A, Teunissen SCCM. Determinants of unbearable suffering in hospice patients who died due to Euthanasia: a retrospective cohort study. Death Stud. 2021;45(6):451‐458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Bosshard G, Jermini D, Eisenhart D, Bär W. Assisted suicide bordering on active euthanasia. Int J Legal Med. 2003;117(2):106‐108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Brinkman‐Stoppelenburg A, Vergouwe Y, van der Heide A, Onwuteaka‐Philipsen BD. Obligatory consultation of an independent physician on euthanasia requests in the Netherlands: what influences the SCEN physicians judgment of the legal requirements of due care? Health Policy. 2014;115(1):75‐81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Brits L, Human L, Pieterse L, Sonnekus P, Joubert G. Opinions of private medical practitioners in Bloemfontein, South Africa, regarding euthanasia of terminally ill patients. J Med Ethics. 2009;35(3):180‐182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Brouwer M, Kaczor C, Battin MP, Maeckelberghe E, Lantos JD, Verhagen E. Should pediatric euthanasia be legalized? Pediatrics. 2018;141(2):e20171343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Browne A. Causation, intention, and active euthanasia. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2006;15(1):71‐80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Buiting H, van Delden J, Onwuteaka‐Philpsen B, et al. Reporting of euthanasia and physician‐assisted suicide in the Netherlands: descriptive study. BMC Med Ethics. 2009;10(1):18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Burgermeister J. French parliamentary committee advocates passive euthanasia. BMJ. 2004;329:474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Burgermeister J. Doctor reignites euthanasia row in Belgium after mercy killing. BMJ. 2006;332(7538):382.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Burkhardt S, La Harpe R, Harding TW, Sobel J. Euthanasia and assisted suicide: comparison of legal aspects in Switzerland and other countries. Med Sci Law. 2006;46(4):287‐294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Carter BS. Why Palliative Care for Children is Preferable to Euthanasia. SAGE Publications Sage CA; 2016:5‐7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Carter GL, Clover KA, Parkinson L, et al. Mental health and other clinical correlates of euthanasia attitudes in an Australian outpatient cancer population. Psycho‐Oncol. 2007;16(4):295‐303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Chao D. Euthanasia revisited. Fam Pract. 2002;19(2):128‐134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Chavan B, Patra S. Euthanasia: evolving role of the psychiatrists in India. Indian J Psychiatry. 2012;54(2):108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Cohen J, Dierickx S, Penders YWH, Deliens L, Chambaere K. How accurately is euthanasia reported on death certificates in a country with legal euthanasia: a population‐based study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018;33(7):689‐693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Cohen‐Almagor R. Should doctors suggest euthanasia to their patients? reflections on Dutch perspectives. Theor Med Bioeth. 2002;23(4):287‐303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Cohen‐Almagor R. The guidelines for euthanasia in the Netherlands. Ethic Perspect. 2002;9(1):3‐20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Cohen‐Almagor R. Belgian euthanasia law: a critical analysis. J Med Ethics. 2009;35(7):436‐439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Cohen‐Almagor R. First do no harm: Euthanasia of patients with dementia in Belgium. J Med Philos. 2016;41:74‐89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Cohen‐Almagor R. Should the Euthanasia Act in Belgium include minors? Perspect Biol Med. 2018;61(2):230‐248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Comby M, Filbet M. The demand for euthanasia in palliative care units: a prospective study in seven units of the ‘Rhône‐Alpes’ region. Palliat Med. 2005;19(8):587‐593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Cuttini M. Should euthanasia be legal? An international survey of neonatal intensive care units staff. Arch Dis Childhood Fetal Neonatal Edit. 2004;89(1):19F‐24F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. De Beaufort ID, van de Vathorst S. Dementia and assisted suicide and euthanasia. J Neurol. 2016;263(7):1463‐1467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. de Boer ME, Dröes R‐M, Jonker C, Eefsting JA, Hertogh CMPM. Advance directives for euthanasia in dementia: do law‐based opportunities lead to more euthanasia? Health Policy. 2010;98(2‐3):256‐262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. De Haan J. The new Dutch law on euthanasia. Med Law Rev. 2002;10:57‐75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Dees MK, Vernooij‐Dassen MJ, Dekkers WJ, Elwyn G, Vissers KC, van Weel C. Perspectives of decision‐making in requests for euthanasia: a qualitative research among patients, relatives and treating physicians in the Netherlands. Palliat Med. 2013;27(1):27‐37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Demedts D, Roelands M, Libbrecht J, Bilsen J. The attitudes, role & knowledge of mental health nurses towards euthanasia because of unbearable mental suffering in Belgium: a pilot study. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2018;25(7):400‐410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Denys D. Is euthanasia psychiatric treatment? the struggle with death on request in the Netherlands. Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175(9):822‐823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Deschepper R, Distelmans W, Bilsen J. Requests for euthanasia/physician‐assisted suicide on the basis of mental suffering: vulnerable patients or vulnerable physicians? JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71(6):617‐618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Dierickx S, Deliens L, Cohen J, Chambaere K. Comparison of the expression and granting of requests for euthanasia in Belgium in 2007 vs 2013. JAMA Int Med. 2015;175(10):1703‐1706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Dierickx S, Deliens L, Cohen J, Chambaere K. Euthanasia in Belgium: trends in reported cases between 2003 and 2013. Can Med Assoc J. 2016;188(16):E407‐E414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Dierickx S, Deliens L, Cohen J, Chambaere K. Euthanasia for people with psychiatric disorders or dementia in Belgium: analysis of officially reported cases. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Dierickx S, Onwuteaka‐Philipsen B, Penders Y, et al. Commonalities and differences in legal euthanasia and physician‐assisted suicide in three countries: a population‐level comparison. Int J Public Health. 2020;65(1):65‐73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Dimond B. Confidentiality 12: the problems posed by suicide and euthanasia. Br J Nurs. 2000;9(1):52‐53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Dimond B. Healthcare professionals and euthanasia: current law in the UK. Br J Nurs. 2004;13(15):922‐924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Downie J. The contested lessons of euthanasia in the Netherlands. Health Law J. 2000;8:119‐139. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Draper B, Peisah C, Snowdon J, Brodaty H. Early dementia diagnosis and the risk of suicide and euthanasia. Alzheimer's Dement J Alzheimer's Asso. 2010;6(1):75‐82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Emanuel E. Euthanasia and physician‐assisted suicide: focus on the data. Med J Aust. 2017;206(8):339‐340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Emanuel EJ. Depression, euthanasia, and improving end‐of‐life care. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6456‐6458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Emanuel EJ. Attitudes and practices of US oncologists regarding euthanasia and physician‐assisted suicide. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133(7):527‐532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Emanuel EJ, Onwuteaka‐Philipsen BD, Urwin JW, Cohen J. Attitudes and practices of euthanasia and physician‐assisted suicide in the United States, Canada, and Europe. JAMA. 2016;316(1):79‐90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Erdek M. Pain medicine and palliative care as an alternative to euthanasia in end‐of‐life cancer care. Linacre Q. 2015;82(2):128‐134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Evenblij K, Pasman HRW, Pronk R, Onwuteaka‐Philipsen BD. Euthanasia and physician‐assisted suicide in patients suffering from psychiatric disorders: a cross‐sectional study exploring the experiences of Dutch psychiatrists. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19(1):74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Evenblij K, Pasman HRW, Van Der Heide A, Hoekstra T, Onwuteaka‐Philipsen BD. Factors associated with requesting and receiving euthanasia: a nationwide mortality follow‐back study with a focus on patients with psychiatric disorders, dementia, or an accumulation of health problems related to old age. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Fitzgerald F. An academic internist looks at euthanasia. Health Care Anal. 2004;12(3):209‐214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Frenkel DA. Euthanasia in Israeli law. Forensic Sci Int. 2000;113(1‐3):501‐504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Friedel M, Terwangne B, Brichard B, Ruysseveldt I, Renard M. The Belgian euthanasia law and its impact on the practises of Belgian paediatric palliative care teams. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2018;24(7):333‐337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Gamester N, Van den Eynden B. The relationship between palliative care and legalized euthanasia in Belgium. J Palliat Med. 2009;12(7):589‐591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Garrard E. Passive euthanasia. J Med Ethics. 2005;31(2):65‐68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Gastmans C, De Lepeleire J. Living to the bitter end? A personalist approach to euthanasia in persons with severe dementia. Bioethics. 2010;24(2):78‐86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Georges J‐J, Onwuteaka‐Philipsen BD, Muller MT, Van Der Wal G, Van Der Heide A, Van Der Maas PJ. Relatives’ perspective on the terminally ill patients who died after euthanasia or physician‐assisted suicide: a retrospective cross‐sectional interview study in the Netherlands. Death Stud. 2007;31(1):1‐15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Georges J‐J, Onwuteaka‐Philipsen BD, van der Wal G, van der Heide A, van der Maas PJ. Differences between terminally ill cancer patients who died after euthanasia had been performed and terminally ill cancer patients who did not request euthanasia. Palliat Med. 2005;19(8):578‐586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Gordijn B, Janssens R. New developments in Dutch legislation concerning euthanasia and physician‐assisted suicide. J Med Philos. 2001;26(3):299‐309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Gorsuch NM. A reply to Raymond Tallis on the legalization of assisted suicide and euthanasia. J Leg Med. 2007;28(3):327‐332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Guirimand F, Dubois E, Laporte L, Richard J‐F, Leboul D. Death wishes and explicit requests for euthanasia in a palliative care hospital: an analysis of patients files. BMC Palliat Care. 2014;13(1):53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Guo F, A Concept Analysis of Voluntary Active Euthanasia. Nursing Forum. Wiley Online Library; 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Hall W, Parker M. Reasons for ambivalence about accepting addiction as a reason for performing euthanasia. Addiction. 2018;113(7):1186‐1187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Hanson SS. Pediatric euthanasia and palliative care can work together. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 2016;33(5):421‐424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Hanssen‐de Wolf JE, Pasman HRW, Onwuteaka‐Philipsen BD. How do general practitioners assess the criteria for due care for euthanasia in concrete cases? Health Policy. 2008;87(3):316‐325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Haverkate I. Refused and granted requests for euthanasia and assisted suicide in the Netherlands: interview study with structured questionnaire. BMJ. 2000;321(7265):865‐866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Hayashi M, Kitamura T. Euthanasia trials in Japan. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2002;25(6):557‐571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Hertogh CMPM. The role of advance euthanasia directives as an aid to communication and shared decision‐making in dementia. J Med Ethics. 2009;35(2):100‐103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Hodel MA, Trachsel M. Euthanasia or assisted suicide in patients with psychiatric illness. JAMA. 2016;316(20):2153‐2154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Hurst SA. Assisted suicide and euthanasia in Switzerland: allowing a role for non‐physicians. BMJ. 2003;326(7383):271‐273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Jacobs RK, Hendricks M. Medical students’ perspectives on euthanasia and physician‐assisted suicide and their views on legalising these practices in South Africa. SAMJ. 2018;108(6):484‐489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Jansen‐van der Weide MC, Onwuteaka‐Philipsen BD, van der Wal G. Granted, undecided, withdrawn, and refused requests for euthanasia and physician‐assisted suicide. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(15):1698‐1704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Johansen S, Hølen JC, Kaasa S, Kaasa S, Loge JH, Materstvedt LJ. Attitudes towards, and wishes for, euthanasia in advanced cancer patients at a palliative medicine unit. Palliat Med. 2005;19(6):454‐460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Kakuk P. The slippery slope of the middle ground: reconsidering euthanasia in Britain. HEC Forum. 2007;19:145‐159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Kanchan T, Atreya A, Krishan K. Aruna Shanbaug: is her demise the end of the road for legislation on euthanasia in India? Sci Eng Ethics. 2016;22(4):1251‐1253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Karlsson M, Strang P, Milberg A. Attitudes toward euthanasia among Swedish medical students. Palliat Med. 2007;21(7):615‐622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Kelly D. Dying patients with cancer reflected on implications of euthanasia. Evid Based Nurs. 2009;12(2):63 ‐. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Kioko P, Requena P. Towards a definition of unbearable suffering and the incongruence of psychiatric euthanasia. Br J Psychiatry. 2018;212(4):247‐248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Kissane DW. Case presentation. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2000;19(6):472‐473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Klein M. Voluntary active euthanasia and the doctrine of double effect: a view from Germany. Health Care Anal. 2004;12(3):225‐240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Kompanje EJO, de Beaufort ID, Bakker J. Euthanasia in intensive care: a 56‐year‐old man with a pontine hemorrhage resulting in a locked‐in syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(10):2428‐2430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Koopman JJ, Putter H. Regional variation in the practice of euthanasia and physician‐assisted suicide in the Netherlands. Neth J Med. 2016;74(9):387‐394. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Kouwenhoven PS, Raijmakers NJ, van Delden JJ, et al. Opinions of health care professionals and the public after eight years of euthanasia legislation in the Netherlands: a mixed methods approach. Palliat Med. 2013;27(3):273‐280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Kouwenhoven PS, Raijmakers NJ, van Delden JJ, et al. Opinions about euthanasia and advanced dementia: a qualitative study among Dutch physicians and members of the general public. BMC Med Ethics. 2015;16(1):7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Kouwenhoven PSC, van Thiel GJMW, Raijmakers NJH, Rietjens JAC, van der Heide A, van Delden JJM. Euthanasia or physician‐assisted suicide? A survey from the Netherlands. Eur J Gen Pract. 2014;20(1):25‐31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Kuschner WG, Gruenewald DA, Clum N, Beal A, Ezeji‐Okoye SC. Implementation of ICU palliative care guidelines and procedures. Chest. 2009;135(1):26‐32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Lavery JV, Boyle J, Dickens BM, Maclean H, Singer PA. Origins of the desire for euthanasia and assisted suicide in people with HIV‐1 or AIDS: a qualitative study. Lancet. 2001;358(9279):362‐367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Leenaars A, Connolly J, Cantor C, et al. Suicide, assisted suicide and euthanasia: international perspectives. Ir J Psychol Med. 2001;18(1):33‐37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Legemaate J, Bolt I. The Dutch euthanasia act: recent legal developments. Eur J Health Law. 2013;20(5):451‐469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Levy TB, Azar S, Huberfeld R, Siegel AM, Strous RD. Attitudes towards euthanasia and assisted suicide: a comparison between psychiatrists and other physicians. Bioethics. 2013;27(7):402‐408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Lewis P. Euthanasia in Belgium five years after legalisation. Eur J Health Law. 2009;16:125‐138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Loewy EH. Euthanasia, physician assisted suicide and other methods of helping along death. Health Care Anal. 2004;12(3):181‐193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Lopez‐Castroman J. About the practice of psychiatric euthanasia: a commentary. BMC Med. 2017;15(1):125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Maessen M, Veldink JH, Onwuteaka‐Philipsen BD, et al. Euthanasia and physician‐assisted suicide in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a prospective study. J Neurol. 2014;261(10):1894‐1901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Maessen M, Veldink JH, Berg LH, Schouten HJ, Wal G, Onwuteaka‐Philipsen BD. Requests for euthanasia: origin of suffering in ALS, heart failure, and cancer patients. J Neurol. 2010;257(7):1192‐1198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Maggiore SM, Antonelli M. Euthanasia, therapeutic obstinacy or something else? an Italian case. Springer. 2005;31:997‐998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Mak YYW. Patients’ voices are needed in debates on euthanasia. BMJ. 2003;327(7408):213‐215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Mak YYW, Elwyn G. Voices of the terminally ill: uncovering the meaning of desire for euthanasia. Palliat Med. 2005;19(4):343‐350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. Malpas P, Johnson M. Response to: ‘what should we tell medical students and residents about euthanasia and assisted suicide?’. Austral New Zealand J Psychiatry. 2013;47(3):290‐291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Manninen BA. A case for justified non‐voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen protocol. J Med Ethics. 2006;32(11):643‐651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Marcoux I, Onwuteaka‐Philipsen BD, Jansen‐Van Der Weide MC, WAL GVD. Withdrawing an explicit request for euthanasia or physician‐assisted suicide: a retrospective study on the influence of mental health status and other patient characteristics. Psychol Med. 2005;35(9):1265‐1274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162. McGlade KJ, Slaney L, Bunting BP, Gallagher AG. Voluntary euthanasia in Northern Ireland: general practitioners’ beliefs, experiences, and actions. Br J Gen Pract J R Coll Gen Pract. 2000;50(459):794‐797. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163. Miljković MD, Jones BL, Miller K. From the euthanasia society to physician orders for life‐sustaining treatment: end‐of‐life care in the United States. Cancer J. 2013;19(5):438‐443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164. Miller DG, Dresser R, Kim SYH. Advance euthanasia directives: a controversial case and its ethical implications. J Med Ethics. 2019;45(2):84‐89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165. Miller DG, Kim SYH. Euthanasia and physician‐assisted suicide not meeting due care criteria in the Netherlands: a qualitative review of review committee judgements. BMJ Open. 2017;7(10):e017628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166. Moody J. Euthanasia: a need for reform. Nurs Stand. 2003;17(25):40‐44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167. Moynier‐Vantieghem K, Weber C, Espolio DY, Pautex S, Zulian G. Demands for death (suicide assistance and euthanasia) in palliative medicine. Rev Med Suisse. 2010;6(234):261‐265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168. Mukhida K. Loving your child to death: considerations of the care of chronically ill children and euthanasia in Emil Sher's Mourning Dove. Paediatr Child Health. 2007;12(10):859‐865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169. Nathanson V. Euthanasia, physicians and HIV infected persons. HIV Med. 2001;2(1):1‐2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170. Nicolini ME, Peteet JR, Donovan GK, Kim SYH. Euthanasia and assisted suicide of persons with psychiatric disorders: the challenge of personality disorders. Psychol Med. 2020;50(4):575‐582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171. Norwood F, Kimsma G, Battin MP. Vulnerability and the ‘slippery slope'at the end‐of‐life: a qualitative study of euthanasia, general practice and home death in the Netherlands. Fam Pract. 2009;26(6):472‐480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172. Novaković M, Babić D, Dedić G, Leposavić L, Milovanović A, Novaković M. Euthanasia of patients with the chronic renal failure. Coll Antropol. 2009;33(1):179‐185. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173. Nuland SB. Physician‐assisted suicide and euthanasia in practice. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:583‐584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174. Oehmichen M, Meissner C. Life shortening and physician assistance in dying: Euthanasia from the viewpoint of German legal medicine. Gerontology. 2000;46(4):212‐218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175. Okishiro N, Miyashita M, Tsuneto S, Sato K, Shima Y. The Japan HOspice and palliative care evaluation study (J‐HOPE Study): views about legalization of death with dignity and euthanasia among the bereaved whose family member died at palliative care units. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 2009;26(2):98‐104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176. Olié E, Courtet P. The controversial issue of euthanasia in patients with psychiatric illness. JAMA. 2016;316(6):656‐657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177. Onwuteaka‐Philipsen BD, Brinkman‐Stoppelenburg A, Penning C, de Jong‐Krul GJ, van Delden JJ, van der Heide A. Trends in end‐of‐life practices before and after the enactment of the euthanasia law in the Netherlands from 1990 to 2010: a repeated cross‐sectional survey. Lancet. 2012;380(9845):908‐915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178. Onwuteaka‐Philipsen BD, Rurup ML, Pasman HRW, van der Heide A. The last phase of life: who requests and who receives euthanasia or physician‐assisted suicide? Med Care. 2010;48:596‐603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179. Pacheco J, Hershberger PJ, Markert RJ, Kumar G. A longitudinal study of attitudes toward physician‐assisted suicide and euthanasia among patients with noncurable malignancy. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 2003;20(2):99‐104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180. Pasman HRW, Rurup ML, Willems DL, Onwuteaka‐Philipsen BD. Concept of unbearable suffering in context of ungranted requests for euthanasia: qualitative interviews with patients and physicians. BMJ. 2009;339:b4362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181. Perreault A, Benrimoh D, Fielding A. Euthanasia requests in a Canadian psychiatric outpatient clinic: a case series part 2 of the McGill University euthanasia in psychiatry case series. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019;66:101464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182. Picard G, Bier J‐C, Capron I, et al. Dementia, end of life, and euthanasia: a survey among dementia specialists organized by the Belgian Dementia Council. J Alzheimer's Dis. 2019;69(4):989‐1001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183. Pope TM, Okninski ME. Legal standards for brain death and undue influence in euthanasia laws. J Bioeth Inq. 2016;13(2):173‐178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184. Poreddi V, Nagarajaiah I, Konduru R, Math SB. Euthanasia: the perceptions of nurses in India. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2013;19(4):187‐193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185. Portacolone E, Covinsky KE, Johnson JK, Rubinstein RL, Halpern J. Walking the tightrope between study participant autonomy and researcher integrity: the case study of a research participant with Alzheimer's disease pursuing euthanasia in Switzerland. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2019;14(5):483‐486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186. Quill T. Dutch practice of euthanasia and assisted suicide: a glimpse at the edges of the practice. J Med Ethics. 2018;44:297‐298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187. Roscoe LA, Malphurs JE, Dragovic LJ, Cohen D. A comparison of characteristics of Kevorkian euthanasia cases and physician‐assisted suicides in Oregon. Gerontologist. 2001;41(4):439‐446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188. Ruijs CD, van der Wal G, Kerkhof AJ, Onwuteaka‐Philipsen BD. Unbearable suffering and requests for euthanasia prospectively studied in end‐of‐life cancer patients in primary care. BMC Palliat Care. 2014;13(1):62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189. Rurup ML, Onwuteaka‐Philipsen BD, Jansen‐van der Weide MC, van der Wal G. When being ‘tired of living'plays an important role in a request for euthanasia or physician‐assisted suicide: patient characteristics and the physician's decision. Health Policy. 2005;74(2):157‐166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190. Rurup ML, Muller MT, Onwuteaka‐Philipsen BD, Van Der Heide A, Van Der Wal G, Van Der Maas PJ. Requests for euthanasia or physician‐assisted suicide from older persons who do not have a severe disease: an interview study. Psychol Med. 2005;35(5):665‐671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191. Salib E, Tadros G. Passive euthanasia in dementia: killing or letting die? Med Sci Law. 2001;41(3):237‐240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192. Schäfer C, Dietl B, Loew TH, Kölbl O. What about the family when a terminally ill cancer patient makes a request for euthanasia? J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(19):3211‐3212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193. Schuurmans J, Bouwmeester R, Crombach L, et al. Euthanasia requests in dementia cases; what are experiences and needs of Dutch physicians? A qualitative interview study. BMC Med Ethics. 2019;20(1):66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194. Seear K, Fraser S. Euthanasia for what? attending to the role of stigma in addiction‐related ‘intractable suffering' and ‘incurability. Addiction. 2018;113(7):1181‐1182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195. Shah A, Mushtaq A. The right to live or die? A perspective on voluntary euthanasia. Pak J Med Sci. 2014;30(5):1159‐1160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196. Sharp R. The dangers of euthanasia and dementia: how Kantian thinking might be used to support non‐voluntary euthanasia in cases of extreme dementia. Bioethics. 2012;26(5):231‐235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197. Shaw D. The body as unwarranted life support: a new perspective on euthanasia. J Med Ethics. 2007;33(9):519‐521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198. Shekhar S, Goel A. Euthanasia: India's position in the global scenario. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 2013;30(7):628‐631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199. Simillis C. Euthanasia: a summary of the law in England and Wales. Med Sci Law. 2008;48(3):191‐198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200. Sinha V, Basu S, Sarkhel S. Euthanasia: an Indian perspective. Indian J Psychiatry. 2012;54(2):177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201. Sleeboom‐Faulkner M. Chinese concepts of euthanasia and health care 1. Bioethics. 2006;20(4):203‐212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202. Smets T, Bilsen J, Van den Block L, Cohen J, Van Casteren V, Deliens L. Euthanasia in patients dying at home in Belgium: interview study on adherence to legal safeguards. Br J Gen Pract. 2010;60(573):e163‐e170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203. Snijdewind MC, van Tol DG, Onwuteaka‐Philipsen BD, Willems DL. Complexities in euthanasia or physician‐assisted suicide as perceived by Dutch physicians and patients’ relatives. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014;48(6):1125‐1134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204. Sprung CL, Somerville MA, Radbruch L, et al. Physician‐assisted suicide and euthanasia: emerging issues from a global perspective. J Palliat Care. 2018;33(4):197‐203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205. Thienpont L, Verhofstadt M, Van Loon T, Distelmans W, Audenaert K, De Deyn PP. Euthanasia requests, procedures and outcomes for 100 Belgian patients suffering from psychiatric disorders: a retrospective, descriptive study. BMJ Open. 2015;5(7):e007454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206. Thomas FP, Beres A, Shevell MI. A cold wind coming”: heinrich gross and child euthanasia in Vienna. J Child Neurol. 2006;21(4):342‐348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207. Tomlinson E, Spector A, Nurock S, Stott J. Euthanasia and physician‐assisted suicide in dementia: a qualitative study of the views of former dementia carers. Palliat Med. 2015;29(8):720‐726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208. Tuffrey‐Wijne I, Curfs L, Finlay I, Hollins S. Euthanasia and assisted suicide for people with an intellectual disability and/or autism spectrum disorder: an examination of nine relevant euthanasia cases in the Netherlands (2012–2016). BMC Med Ethics. 2018;19(1):17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209. van Alphen JE, Donker GA, Marquet RL. Requests for euthanasia in general practice before and after implementation of the Dutch Euthanasia Act. Br J Gen Pract. 2010;60(573):263‐267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210. van Heest F, Finlay I, Kramer J, Otter R, Meyboom‐de Jong B. Telephone consultations on palliative sedation therapy and euthanasia in general practice in the Netherlands in 2003: a report from inside. Fam Pract. 2009;26(6):481‐487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211. van Tol DG, Rietjens JAC, van der Heide A. Empathy and the application of the ‘unbearable suffering'criterion in Dutch euthanasia practice. Health Policy. 2012;105(2‐3):296‐302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212. Van Wijngaarden EJ, Leget CJW, Goossensen A. Till death do us part: the lived experience of an elderly couple who chose to end their lives by spousal self‐euthanasia. Gerontologist. 2016;56(6):1062‐1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213. Veldink JH, Wokke JHJ, van der Wal G, Vianney de Jong JMB, van den Berg LH. Euthanasia and physician‐assisted suicide among patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in the Netherlands. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(21):1638‐1644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214. Verhagen AAE. The Groningen protocol for newborn euthanasia; which way did the slippery slope tilt? J Med Ethics. 2013;39(5):293‐295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215. Verhagen AE. Neonatal Euthanasia: Lessons from the Groningen Protocol. Elsevier; 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216. Verhagen E, Sauer PJJ. The Groningen protocol—euthanasia in severely ill newborns. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(10):959‐962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217. Vermeersch E. The Belgian law on euthanasia the historical and ethical background. Acta Chir Belg. 2002;102(6):394‐397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218. Vincent J‐L. End‐of‐life practice in Belgium and the new euthanasia law. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32(11):1908‐1911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219. Vink T. Self‐euthanasia, the Dutch experience: in search for the meaning of a good death or eu thanatos. Bioethics. 2016;30(9):681‐688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220. Virik K, Glare P. Requests for euthanasia made to a tertiary referral teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia in the year 2000. Supp Care Cancer. 2002;10(4):309‐313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221. Voultsos P, Chatzinikolaou F. Involuntary euthanasia of severely ill newborns: is the Groningen protocol really dangerous? Hippokratia. 2014;18(3):193. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222. Waals EMF, Post MWM, Peers K, Kiekens C. Experiences with euthanasia requests of persons with SCI in Belgium. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2018;4(1):62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223. Wand APF, Peisah C, Draper B, Jones C, Brodaty H. Rational suicide, euthanasia, and the very old: two case reports. Case Rep Psychiatry. 2016;2016:1‐5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224. Verhofstadt M, Thienpont L, Peters G‐JY. When unbearable suffering incites psychiatric patients to request euthanasia: qualitative study. Br J Psychiatry. 2017;211(4):238‐245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225. Tatum PE, Mills SS. Hospice and palliative care: an overview. Med Clin. 2020;104(3):359‐373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226. Seale C, Addington‐Hall J. Euthanasia: why people want to die earlier. Soc Sci Med. 1994;39(5):647‐654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227. Wiebe E, Shaw J, Green S, Trouton K, Kelly M. Reasons for requesting medical assistance in dying. Can Fam Phys. 2018;64(9):674‐679. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228. Vigo D, Thornicroft G, Atun R. Estimating the true global burden of mental illness. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(2):171‐178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229. Snijdewind MC, Willems DL, Deliens L, Onwuteaka‐Philipsen BD, Chambaere K. A study of the first year of the end‐of‐life clinic for physician‐assisted dying in the Netherlands. JAMA Int Med. 2015;175(10):1633‐1640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230. Erdmann A, Spoden C, Hirschberg I, Neitzke G. The wish to die and hastening death in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a scoping review. BMJ Supp Palliat Care. 2021;11(3):271‐287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231. Nuebling GS, Butzhammer E, Lorenzl S. Assisted suicide in Parkinsonian disorders. Front Neurol. 2021;12:656599. 10.3389/fneur.2021.656599 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232. Chiò A, Gauthier A, Montuschi A, et al. A cross sectional study on determinants of quality of life in ALS. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75(11):1597‐1601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233. Anghelescu DL, Oakes L, Hinds PS. Palliative care and pediatrics. Anesthesiol Clin North America. 2006;24(1):145‐161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234. Chambaere K, Roelands M, Deliens L. Euthanasia for minors in Belgium. JAMA. 2014;312(12):1258‐1259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235. Bovens L. Child euthanasia: should we just not talk about it? J Med Ethics. 2015;41:630‐634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236. Robertson JA. Involuntary Euthanasia of Defective Newborns: A Legal Analysis. Routledge; 2019:345‐401. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237. Roest B, Trappenburg M, Leget C. The involvement of family in the Dutch practice of euthanasia and physician assisted suicide: a systematic mixed studies review. BMC Med Ethics. 2019;20(1):23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238. Vrakking AM, van der Heide A, Arts WF, et al. Medical end‐of‐life decisions for children in the Netherlands. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159(9):802‐809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239. Montori VM, Smieja M, Guyatt GH. Publication Bias: A Brief Review for Clinicians. Elsevier; 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240. de Vries E, Leal Arenas FA, van der Heide A, et al. Medical decisions concerning the end of life for cancer patients in three Colombian hospitals–a survey study. BMC Palliat Care. 2021;20(1):161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions. All of the extracted data are represented within the manuscript.


Articles from Health Science Reports are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES