Table 4.

Regression Results of Model Set 2 - How the interaction between communication and ethnic discrimination relates to prenatal psychological distress

	Depression	State Anxiety	Perceived Stress
Intercept	7.75*	1.28**	3.01
	(3.81)	(0.46)	(2.06)
Ethnic Discrimination	6.61*	1.01**	4.03*
	(2.75)	(0.35)	(1.60)
Baby's Maternal Grandmother (MGM) - Communication	0.01	0.12*	0.43
	(0.46)	(0.06)	(0.27)
Baby's Paternal Grandmother (PGM) - Communication	−0.38	−0.09	−0.29
	(0.45)	(0.05)	(0.25)
Baby's Father (F) - Communication	−0.28	0.05	0.01
	(0.51)	(0.07)	(0.30)
Socio-Economic Status	−1.02*	−0.10	−0.48*
	(0.42)	(0.05)	(0.23)
Age	−0.02	0.00	0.00
	(0.06)	(0.01)	(0.03)
Trimester	0.30	−0.03	0.37
	(0.55)	(0.07)	(0.30)
Parity	−0.32	−0.03	−0.23
	(0.26)	(0.03)	(0.14)
Foreign Born	0.29	−0.12	0.31
	(0.63)	(0.08)	(0.37)
Ethnic Discrimination × MGM Communication	−0.78*	−0.14**	−0.47*
	(0.39)	(0.05)	(0.22)
Ethnic Discrimination × PGM Communication	0.20	0.03	0.24
	(0.49)	(0.05)	(0.26)
Ethnic Discrimination × F Communication	−0.32	−0.07	−0.32
	(0.49)	(0.06)	(0.29)
R-squared	0.24	0.16	0.19

The moderation of communication from allomothers on ethnic discrimination (row 11-13) on depression, state-anxiety, and perceived stress (column 1-3, respectively), holding certain main effects (rows 2-5) and covariates (rows 6-10) constant. Each cell contains a pooled beta, with stars indicating the significance level (*** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05) and robust standard errors in the parentheses. Each model was run on a sample of N = 216. R² is presented. Model comparisons calculated from 5 imputed data sets against their respective null models produced the following pooled F-statistics and p-values (respectively) for depression (3.669; <0.0001), state-anxiety (2.655; 0.005), and perceived stress (2.788; 0.003).