Table 5.

Regression Results of Model Set 2 - How the interaction between geographic proximity and discrimination relates to prenatal psychological distress

	Depression	State Anxiety	Perceived Stress
Intercept	3.35	1.43***	2.61
	(3.12)	(0.38)	(1.69)
Ethnic Discrimination	3.55	0.28	2.20
	(2.14)	(0.30)	(1.28)
Baby's Maternal Grandmother (MGM) - Geographic Proximity	0.12	0.07	0.19
	(0.40)	(0.05)	(0.22)
Baby's Paternal Grandmother (PGM) - Geographic Proximity	0.06	−0.08	0.14
	(0.54)	(0.07)	(0.28)
Baby's Father (F) - Geographic Proximity	0.08	0.03	0.01
	(0.51)	(0.07)	(0.28)
Socio-Economic Status	−0.95*	−0.10	−0.48*
	(0.43)	(0.05)	(0.23)
Age	0.02	0.01	0.02
	(0.07)	(0.01)	(0.03)
Trimester	0.20	−0.03	0.36
	(0.60)	(0.07)	(0.32)
Parity	−0.29	−0.03	−0.23
	(0.27)	(0.03)	(0.14)
Foreign Born	0.52	−0.08	0.44
	(0.68)	(0.09)	(0.39)
Ethnic Discrimination × MGM Geographic Proximity	−0.14	−0.03	−0.12
	(0.39)	(0.05)	(0.22)
Ethnic Discrimination × PGM Geographic Proximity	0.27	0.12	0.13
	(0.59)	(0.08)	(0.32)
Ethnic Discrimination × F Geographic Proximity	−0.32	−0.06	−0.25
	(0.48)	(0.06)	(0.25)
R-squared	0.18	0.14	0.17

The relationship of discrimination (row 2) on depression, state-anxiety, and perceived stress (columns 1-3, respectively), holding certain covariates constant (row 3-7). Each cell contains the pooled beta, with stars indicating significance level (*** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05) and pooled robust standard errors in the parentheses. R², the pooled coefficient of determination indicating how much variation in mental health is explained by the predictor and control variables, is also presented. Each model is run on a sample size of 216. Model comparison calculated from 5 imputed data sets against their respective null models produced the following pooled (F-statistics; p-values): depression (1.302, 0.230), state anxiety 1.039; 0.406), perceived stress (1.528; 0.133).