Table 2.
Summary of process evaluations and causal-comparative studies.
| App type and name | Design | Duration | Participants | Findings | |
| Planning apps | |||||
|
|
App 33 (GreenCobra) [36] | Cohort | 2 wk | 30 participants | Significant knowledge gain |
|
|
App 37 (MFGa) [35] | Cohort | 3 wk | 12 participants int eh control group | Significant knowledge gain |
|
|
App 39 (MyNutriCart) [43] | App vs education | 8 wk | 27 participants in the intervention group and 24 participants in the control group | Nonsignificant difference in healthiness of purchases vs education |
| Selection apps | |||||
|
|
App 26 (EDO app) [50] | Cohort | 12 wk | 143 participants | Significant knowledge gain and significant gain in self-efficacy |
| Multistage apps | |||||
|
|
App 44 (PBGAb) [35] | Cohortc | 3 wk | 12 participants in the intervention group and 12 participants in the control group | Significant knowledge gain |
|
|
App 44 (PBGA) [35] | App 44 (PBGA) vs App 37 (MFG) | 3 wk | 12 participants in the intervention group and 12 participants in the control group | Significant reduction in ultraprocessed food purchases |
aMFG: My Food Guide.
bPBGA: Pirate Bridgitte’s Grocery Adventure.
cKnowledge gain was assessed using a pre- and posttest design, whereas behavior change was assessed by comparing the effects of different apps. Therefore, we list the results in separate table rows even though the 2 evaluations were performed in the same study.