Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 21;25:120. doi: 10.1186/s12859-024-05720-x

Table 4.

The predictive ability of four basic methods and ELPGV, and the comparison p-value between ELPGV and others in CD, UC, IBD with IBDGC dataset

Method CD UC IBD
Predictive ability p-value Predictive ability p-value Predictive ability p-value
ELPGV 0.4516 ± 0.0065 0.7920 ± 0.0045 0.4253 ± 0.0071
BayesA 0.4359 ± 0.0067 1.058E−15 0.7817 ± 0.0045 7.365E−25 0.4128 ± 0.0075 2.470 E−13
BayesB 0.4338 ± 0.0063 4.932E−13 0.7831 ± 0.0047 4.845E−16 0.4052 ± 0.0067 1.911E−14
BayesCπ 0.4452 ± 0.0063 3.938E−07 0.7845 ± 0.0047 3.878E−13 0.4171 ± 0.0068 5.272E−10
GBLUP 0.3692 ± 0.0063 3.659E−34 0.6687 ± 0.0052 3.314E−56 0.3455 ± 0.0079 9.965E−35

ELPGV is the ensemble learning based on BayesA, BayesB, BayesCπ and GBLUP

— Represents no explicit result was found in this method

Crohn disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis disease (UC)