Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 21;25:120. doi: 10.1186/s12859-024-05720-x

Table 5.

The predictive ability of four basic methods and ELPGV, and the comparison p-value between ELPGV and others in mfp, my, scs with cattle dataset

Method mfp my scs
Predictive ability p-value Predictive ability p-value Predictive ability p-value
ELPGV 0.8748 ± 0.0009 0.7959 ± 0.0016 0.7523 ± 0.0019
BayesA 0.8713 ± 0.0010 2.665E−31 0.7935 ± 0.0017 5.726E−19 0.7496 ± 0.0019 1.242E−23
BayesB 0.8739 ± 0.0009 2.356 E−10 0.7948 ± 0.0017 1.335E−07 0.7503 ± 0.0020 5.614E−11
BayesCπ 0.8632 ± 0.0010 5.884E−52 0.7928 ± 0.0017 1.026E−26 0.7518 ± 0.0019 0.001E−00
GBLUP 0.8259 ± 0.0013 9.943E−80 0.7809 ± 0.0017 5.133E−52 0.7482 ± 0.0019 3.801E−29

ELPGV is the ensemble learning based on BayesA, BayesB, BayesCπ and GBLUP

— Represents no explicit result was found in this method

mfp, milk fat percentage; my, milk yield; scs, somatic cell score