Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 21;25:120. doi: 10.1186/s12859-024-05720-x

Table 6.

The predictive ability of four basic methods and ELPGV, and the comparison p-value between ELPGV and others in GY with wheat dataset

Method The first place The second place The third place The fourth place
Predictive ability p-value Predictive ability p-value Predictive ability p-value Predictive ability p-value
ELPGV 0.5273 ± 0.0104 0.5092 ± 0.0101 0.4050 ± 0.0102 0.4722 ± 0.0101
BayesA 0.5231 ± 0.0105 1.550E−10 0.5057 ± 0.0101 1.238E−07 0.3953 ± 0.0103 3.711E−15 0.4676 ± 0.0102 7.265E−14
BayesB 0.5080 ± 0.0104 2.296E−17 0.4947 ± 0.0104 5.993E−12 0.3914 ± 0.0101 4.098E−06 0.4542 ± 0.0101 1.261E−18
BayesCπ 0.5215 ± 0.0105 7.965E−19 0.5046 ± 0.0101 6.695E−11 0.3947 ± 0.0102 2.264E−17 0.4672 ± 0.0102 1.200E−13
GBLUP 0.5251 ± 0.0105 2.297E−04 0.5058 ± 0.0100 7.877E−07 0.3954 ± 0.0104 2.938E−12 0.4698 ± 0.0102 5.013E−05

ELPGV is the ensemble learning based on BayesA, BayesB, BayesCπ and GBLUP

— Represents no explicit result was found in this method