Table 3.
Epoxidation of Aliphatic Aldehydes with VANOL and VAPOL Aluminum Catalystsa
![]() | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
aldehyde | epoxide | Ligand | catalyst (mol%) | R1 | % yield epoxideb | %ee epoxidec |
![]() |
![]() |
(S)-VAPOL | 5 | Bn | 62 | −89 d |
(R)-VANOL | 5 | Bn | 74 | 92 | ||
(S)-VANOL | 10 | Bn | 84 | −95 d | ||
(S)-VANOL | 10 | Bn | 24 | −86 d,e | ||
(S)-VAPOL | 5 | PMB | 50 | −86 d | ||
(R)-VAPOL | 10 | PMB | 79 | 94 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
(S)-VAPOL | 5 | Bn | 68 | −88 d |
(R)-VAPOL | 10 | Bn | 81 | 94 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
(R)-VAPOL | 10 | Bn | 50 | 99 |
![]() |
![]() |
(S)-VAPOL | 5 | Bn | 78 | −56d |
(R)-VAPOL | 10 | Bn | 73 | 58 | ||
(S)-VAPOL | 5 | PMB | 73 | −50d | ||
(R)-VAPOL | 10 | PMB | 86 | 54 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
(S)-VAPOL | 5 | Bn | 85 | −91d |
(S)-VANOL | 5 | Bn | 66 | −80d | ||
(R)-VAPOL | 10 | Bn | 80 | 96 | ||
(S)-VAPOL | 5 | PMB | 76f | −92d,f | ||
(R)-VAPOL | 10 | PMB | 87g | −95g | ||
(S)-VANOL | 5 | PMB | 63 | −83d | ||
![]() |
![]() |
(S)-VAPOL | 5 | Bn | 84 | −50d |
(R)-VAPOL | 10 | Bn | 88 | 92 | ||
(S)-VAPOL | 5 | PMB | 67 | −51d | ||
(R)-VAPOL | 10 | PMB | 78 | 88 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
(S)-VAPOL | 5 | Bn | 75 | −76d |
(R)-VAPOL | 10 | Bn | 74 | 96 | ||
(R)-VANOL | 10 | Bn | 80 | −91d,h | ||
(S)-VANOL | 10 | Bn | 99 | 95i |
Unless otherwise specified, all reactions were carried out in toluene at 0 °C for 12 h with 0.5 mmol diazo compound 1 at 0.1 M with 1.2 equiv of the aldehyde. The catalyst was prepared as indicated in Table 1.
Isolated yields.
Determined by HPLC.
The enantiomer of the epoxide is formed.
Reaction at −40 °C for 12 h.
Average of two runs.
Average of four runs.
This reaction was carried out with a boron catalyst as indicated in Scheme 3 in toluene at −40 °C for 12 h without DMSO.
Carried out as in h but with 20 mol % DMSO.