TABLE 3.
Effectiveness and prevalence-usage for each of the 16 types of campaign activities (Monteria, Colombia. 2021).
| Campaign activity | Outcome: Coefficients B [95% confidence interval] | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forgiveness composite | Anxiety symptoms | Depression symptoms | Flourishing | Prevalence of engagement (rank) | |
| Knowledge-based training | |||||
| REACH workbook | 0.32** [0.24, 0.39] (4) | −0.01 [−0.09, 0.07] | −0.04 [−0.12, 0.03] | 0.12** [0.05, 0.19] | 59.35% (4) |
| Knowledge test | 0.46** [0.36, 0.56] (1) | −0.13* [−0.24, −0.01] (4) | −0.10 [−0.21, 0.00] | 0.21** [0.11, 0.32] (1) | 83.70% (1) |
| Online written entries | |||||
| Forgiveness journal | 0.34** [0.26, 0.42] (2) | −0.05 [−0.14, 0.04] | −0.06 [−0.14, 0.03] | 0.16** [0.07, 0.24] | 21.02% |
| Forgiveness forum | 0.29** [0.21, 0.37] | 0.04 [−0.04, 0.12] | −0.02 [−0.10, 0.06] | 0.10* [0.02, 0.18] | 26.89% |
| Video club forum | 0.27** [0.14, 0.39] | 0.04 [−0.09, 0.18] | 0.04 [−0.09, 0.17] | 0.12 [−0.01, 0.25] | 7.61% |
| Forgiveness videos | |||||
| Video club movies | 0.24** [0.17, 0.31] | −0.11* [−0.19, −0.03] | −0.12** [−0.20, −0.05] (5) | 0.16** [0.09, 0.23] (5) | 40.86% |
| Expert video | 0.22** [0.15, 0.29] | −0.08* [−0.16, −0.01] | −0.06 [−0.13, 0.01] | 0.12** [0.05, 0.20] | 45.66% |
| Animated video | 0.32** [0.25, 0.39] (3) | −0.18** [−0.26, −0.10] (1) | −0.19** [−0.26, −0.11] (1) | 0.18** [0.10, 0.25] (2) | 58.72% (5) |
| Webinars | |||||
| Forgiveness | 0.31** [0.24, 0.38] (5) | −0.16** [−0.24, −0.08] (3) | −0.16** [−0.23, −0.09] (3) | 0.18** [0.10, 0.25] (2) | 51.08% |
| Positive psychology | 0.25** [0.18, 0.32] | −0.18** [−0.25, −0.10] (2) | −0.18** [−0.26, −0.11] (2) | 0.17** [0.10, 0.24] (4) | 43.75% |
| Yoga | 0.15** [0.08, 0.22] | −0.09* [−0.17, −0.01] | −0.09* [−0.17, −0.02] | 0.12** [0.05, 0.19] | 37.87% |
| Mindfulness | 0.20** [0.13, 0.27] | −0.12** [−0.20, −0.04] (5) | −0.13** [−0.20, −0.05] (4) | 0.13** [0.06, 0.21] | 30.76% |
| Other activities | |||||
| Forgiveness tree | 0.17** [0.10, 0.25] | −0.03 [−0.11, 0.05] | −0.06 [−0.13, 0.02] | 0.13** [0.06, 0.21] | 59.94% (3) |
| Forgiveness wall | 0.21** [0.14, 0.29] | −0.08* [−0.16, 0.00] | −0.08* [−0.16, −0.01] | 0.06 [−0.01, 0.14] | 60.39% (2) |
| Mantra | 0.22** [0.15, 0.29] | −0.06 [−0.14, 0.02] | −0.11** [−0.19, −0.04] | 0.11** [0.04, 0.18] | 41.14% |
| Social media marathon | 0.15** [0.08, 0.22] | −0.02 [−0.09, 0.06] | 0.00 [−0.08, 0.07] | 0.03 [−0.04, 0.10] | 49.76% |
Note. Values in parentheses are the rank of each campaign activity within each column, and the top five ranked campaign activities in each column are in bold. For the forgiveness composite (computed as the average of six standardized forgiveness outcomes), two mental health outcomes (depression, anxiety), and flourishing, each cell was a separate multilevel modeling regression with time of assessment at level 1 and individual at level 2. In each regression equation, the outcome variable (standardized with M = 0 and SD = 1) was regressed on covariates, engagement in each of the 16 campaign activities (no, yes), time (t2 vs. t1), and the cross-level interaction of time with a campaign activity (one campaign activity at a time). Covariates included age (continuous), sex (female, male), income (lower, higher), marital status (unmarried, married or in a relationship), religious status (not religious, religious), frequency of religious service attendance (continuous), and war survivor status (not a survivor of war, survivor of war). Coefficients are interpreted as, holding all covariates and engagement in other campaign activities equal, engaging in the specific campaign activity of interest is associated with B standard deviation increase in the outcome. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.0031 (0.05/16 which is the Bonferroni adjustment for 16 tests on the same outcome).